being suggested to recruit a guy with 14 judge ability 16 judge potential, to replace a guy with 16 in each
the meetings with backroom staff is often a tiresome affair, but sometimes i attend to see if they'll suggest some good staff or individual training programmes for players. rarely happens. i often get suggested to try training 'x' player in 'x' area, for example endurance; only to be told 4 days later that they're showing no signs of improvement.
these two particular mechanics--the issue of being suggested under-par candidates to replace current employees; and the suggestion of training areas for players, only to tell me less than a week later to give up all hope of them trying to improve--have been an issue for years and need addressing.
photos show stats of staff member being suggested vs currently employed staff member
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now