Jump to content

Srna is so underrated on this game


Recommended Posts

It'd ridiculous.

Decisions: 13??? Srna is an incredibly smart player. His decision making is extremely good. It should be in the 16-17+ range at the least. Determination: 12??? Even more ridiculous. Srna is an incredible leader with incredible heart who will do whatever he can to win and to help his team. He is very determined.

Those are the two real problems with his attributes. Some of the other are probably one or two low as well but these are the true abominations. How can SI get this wrong on such a high profile player?

The problem with SI is that they change attributes based on how good a team is. Arsenal hasn't won anything in awhile, so they lower Fabregas' and some other Arsenal players' attributes. But just because Arsenal hasn't done well doesn't make Fabregas a worse player.

And I'm sure now that Shakhtar has won the Euro Cup all their players will have higher attributes in next year's game. But the players were already that good this year. They should be able to tell how good players are regardless of how the rest of their team performs, or what they win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Players attributes in the top teams are normally allocated by that team's researcher and as such are subject to personal interpretation. Because you feel that one or two attributes are wrong does not mean that this is anything other than a difference in opinion. If you think they are wrong and need to be fixed, post in the Data Issues forum and the relevant researcher will pick it up from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so his sportmanship in the next game should be 0, he is quite possibly the worst diver ive seen since cr7, any breath of wind and he falls over like he's been shot in the face.

i dont mean to sound like an ass but the amount of work that SI puts into scouting i reckon it would be rather accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Players attributes in the top teams are normally allocated by that team's researcher and as such are subject to personal interpretation. Because you feel that one or two attributes are wrong does not mean that this is anything other than a difference in opinion. If you think they are wrong and need to be fixed, post in the Data Issues forum and the relevant researcher will pick it up from there.

As FrazT has said, this isn't for the GPTG. You need to take it up in the relevant thread in the Data Issues forum. :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...