dinamo_zagreb Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Hi... I have two questions and I would be grateful for answers. 1. Why there is huge amount of African players loaded when I start Croatian league (both real version and my self-made league), also I get information when smaller country like Lybia and Gambia releases their manager. :mad: 2. Why there are so many nordic names when I start Bosnian system, young players in lower leagues (and in youth teams from best clubs) are named as Mark Jorgensen and Daniel Kristofersson and other Swedish, Danish and Norwagian names, and they are Bosnians??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IbaltaxGrape Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Considering the Bosnian league is not officially part of the game, it might have something to do with the edited xml you downloaded. Although I have a Bosnian league edit as well and haven't noticed those problems. Have no idea why there would be African players, maybe check the database size you are choosing when you start. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinamo_zagreb Posted December 11, 2009 Author Share Posted December 11, 2009 Considering the Bosnian league is not officially part of the game, it might have something to do with the edited xml you downloaded. Although I have a Bosnian league edit as well and haven't noticed those problems.Have no idea why there would be African players, maybe check the database size you are choosing when you start. Databese size I choose is small, and has 9000 players, while in some other countries is on 3000. And in Bosnia, it is not problem, but it is stupid to have so many nordic and german names for young players. Game creators could have solved it better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elrithral Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Databese size I choose is small, and has 9000 players, while in some other countries is on 3000. And in Bosnia, it is not problem, but it is stupid to have so many nordic and german names for young players. Game creators could have solved it better. But the game creators didn't do it, you're using an edited database. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Neil Brock Posted December 11, 2009 Administrators Share Posted December 11, 2009 This is actually something that was logged on our forums the other day, the numbers have been tweaked and any changes will be visible in the next patch. Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puevlo Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Aren't Croatia and Bosnia part of the same country? I'm not sure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabio MVP Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Aren't Croatia and Bosnia part of the same country? I'm not sure. Lol lol. They are two different countries actually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robzilla Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Aren't Croatia and Bosnia part of the same country? I'm not sure. lolwut Get an atlas dude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puevlo Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 lolwutGet an atlas dude. *shrugs* I know they were both part of Serbia. It's so hard to keep track of countries in that area. Always changing names and governments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakobx Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 *shrugs*I know they were both part of Serbia. It's so hard to keep track of countries in that area. Always changing names and governments. Thats another thing you dont know They were not part of Serbia although during the 90s Serbia really tried to make it so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jascko Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 *shrugs*I know they were both part of Serbia. It's so hard to keep track of countries in that area. Always changing names and governments. Dude, they were never part of Serbia, they were part of Yugoslavia before civil war. Actually I would advise you to be carefull and not saying these kind of things in front of people belonging to these communities, because it can get you in serious trouble. I m saying this for your own good. At the same time you should really read some history and geography. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robzilla Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 *shrugs*I know they were both part of Serbia. It's so hard to keep track of countries in that area. Always changing names and governments. Oh lord, get a book on European history too while you're at it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puevlo Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 LOL okay now I am officially confused. I give up. The whole thing would be a lot easier if they all just became one country again. And I'm sure the people that live there agree with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
blab Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 And I'm sure the people that live there agree with that. No, they don't. You can think of it as the England-Ireland situation. There was a time when England and Ireland were in a common state, the UK of GB and Ireland, but later Ireland claimed independence. The same thing happend in Yugoslavia; it was just a name for the union of federations of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia&Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia and Montenegro which all claimed independence after the fall of the Berlin wall and the iron curtain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FM1000 Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 LOL okay now I am officially confused. I give up. The whole thing would be a lot easier if they all just became one country again. And I'm sure the people that live there agree with that. Although we would kick ass in any sport and especially football that isn't such a good idea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakobx Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 LOL okay now I am officially confused. I give up. The whole thing would be a lot easier if they all just became one country again. And I'm sure the people that live there agree with that. Its like you are trying to dig yourself deeper Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpain16 Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Before the 1990s there was a republic called Yugoslavia. It was consisted of 6 countries - Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, Slovenia, Macedonia, Montenegro. They had an independent history and are consisted of different ethnic groups. But being neighbours for centuries our languages and cultures mixed up and became similar or virtually the same (Slovenian and Macedonian language being the most different to the rest). So there was this bloke called Josip Broz Tito, and after the WW2 he decided to put us all together as "one people" in "one country". Naturally it wasn`t to be, and after more than 40 years along came the war. Now as this is a touchy issue and everyone has their story, it`s enough to say that a bloke called Slobodan Milosevic didn`t kinda like break up of Yugoslavia, and decided to solve things by war. Unluckily for all of the people in all of the countries. Milosevic and his men decided to stick with the name Yugoslavia even though it was only consisted of 2 countries - Serbia and Montenegro. Later in 2003 the name was changed to Serbia and Montenegro, and in 2006 they decided to go separate ways. So you see, Croatia and Bosnia were always separate countries (borders were different throughout history) and were never part of Serbia. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrazT Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Gone a bit off topic- closed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.