smallclone Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Don't think I've ever been beaten so convincingly after playing this well. I'll have words with my defence. http://img14.imageshack.us/i/spursloss.jpg/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPH Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Urm will have to take your word for it? Is there supposed to be a screen shot? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 ???? No info, no screenshot, whats the point in this thread? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smallclone Posted April 26, 2010 Author Share Posted April 26, 2010 erm, try now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NepentheZ Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Don't think I've ever been beaten so convincingly after playing this well. I'll have words with my defence. http://img14.imageshack.us/i/spursloss.jpg/ 7 Clear cut chances, and 0 goals. I think you need to be having words with your strikers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevoRobbo Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 thats impressive but they did have more possession, higher percentage of passes, more crosses, it lokos like their midfield ran the show. Your team must have a stinker, look at the average rating for your team. What strikers do they have because from goals to CCC's they took their chances well and your strikers didnt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DivineOne Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Playing well, you say? Of the 26 shots, only 14 were on target, and only 3 weren't long shots. Little tip: http://community.sigames.com/showthread.php?t=182851 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bliop Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Playing well, you say? Of the 26 shots, only 14 were on target, and only 3 weren't long shots.Little tip: http://community.sigames.com/showthread.php?t=182851 You are wrong. 14 out of 26 on target and 11 long shots out of 26 not 11 out of this 14 on target.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NepentheZ Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Playing well, you say? Of the 26 shots, only 14 were on target, and only 3 weren't long shots. I think you need to look a little bit past that. "only 14" were on target. What do you want man.! A long shot, doesn't also mean, that it's one of the on target ones. He could have had 26 shots, and had the 11 long range ones be off target, (which let's be honest, is more realistic than expecting them to be all on target). The thing you have to look at here is the clear cut chances. He has 7, and couldn't put the ball in the back of the net. That's desperately unlucky. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPH Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 Not that strange in FM! If this happened in every single game then I would say there is something wrong but if these results only happen every now and then I think it is fine. It does happen. Spurs average ratings were very poor - this could mean that even though they had lots of shots they were poor efforts, bad defending the other end etc etc. Oppersition GK must have had a very good game! Were most of the goals conceeded in the second half? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DivineOne Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 I think you need to look a little bit past that. "only 14" were on target. What do you want man.! A long shot, doesn't also mean, that it's one of the on target ones. He could have had 26 shots, and had the 11 long range ones be off target, (which let's be honest, is more realistic than expecting them to be all on target).The thing you have to look at here is the clear cut chances. He has 7, and couldn't put the ball in the back of the net. That's desperately unlucky. You do have a point. Got a bit confused . He should have a look at the analysis though, it can answer lots of questions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smallclone Posted April 26, 2010 Author Share Posted April 26, 2010 Not that strange in FM! If this happened in every single game then I would say there is something wrong but if these results only happen every now and then I think it is fine. It does happen.Spurs average ratings were very poor - this could mean that even though they had lots of shots they were poor efforts, bad defending the other end etc etc. Oppersition GK must have had a very good game! Were most of the goals conceeded in the second half? Yeah if it happenned every game I wouldn't play FM. i DON'T MIND. WAS JUST ANNOYING! it was 3 goals conceeded in each half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPH Posted April 26, 2010 Share Posted April 26, 2010 I would probably have thrown my laptop out of the window (speaking from experience and two new hard-drives later!!!) Wouldn't be the same without these type of emotions though! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.