hozhoz Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Just wondering, having not studied regen patterns in-depth, whether Nations produce players suited to certain roles? Or if this is done in anyway through how the teams coach and the style they play and all regens are random? For example, are England producing taller players, Spain more technical, etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saha's Crocked Knee Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Ummm I am not sure but i think that could be true from what I have seen but, by the time they get near the first team the amount of training makes any difference negliable in FM anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stemlfc Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 I should imagine there is some kind of pattern. Brazil producing more flair and high attributes for dribbling for another example. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sean Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 If this is not already in the game, it should be as some countries are known for certain qualities to be found in players. The obvious examples would be the flair of many (not all) Brazilians, the technical expertise of the Argentinians and the Spanish, the passing (except in today's WC) of the Dutch, the aerial superiority of the Germans, the strength of the English (and the Americans, yes, I said it...) and so on... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBA_Baggies Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 The pace of the African players. Discipline and concentration of the Asian players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Drundrige Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Certain positions and types of players should be more prevalent in some countries, less so in others. There should be a dearth - or complete absence - of deep lying midfielders/playmakers from the UK for example, and lots of 'the new Maradona' coming from Argentina...and so on... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SL Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Don't get the DLP absence in England - Barry and Carrick are prime examples. I think it's just at certain times a country may lack a position or two - I recall a while back there was an urgent need for a left sided midfielder in England. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon army 06 Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 paul schloses is a plamaker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon army 06 Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 they had left sided players but none good enough at the top level. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon army 06 Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 barry is **** hes not a playmaker scholes is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inkstier Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Only problem I have with this is rigidity of national teams in the long run. Would be extremely boring if they produced the same kind of players forever Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dees-Blake Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Only problem I have with this is rigidity of national teams in the long run. Would be extremely boring if they produced the same kind of players forever The teams definitely aren't rigid, and besides, how many generations do you plan on see coming through? Most people are lucky to see an entire new generation, so unless you are the kind of person who makes it to 2100 in every single save I'm not quite sure what you are complaining about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Drundrige Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Ha! Barry is not a deep lying midfielder, he's a decent ball winning midfielder at best, and yeah ok I'll give you Carrick but that's it - and he's not trusted at the highest level apparently. Britain doesn't produce deep lying midfielders the way the rest of Europe/the world does. How many kids in the UK grow up playing as a deep lying midfielder? None I bet. Why have England's 2 foreign coaches resorted to 4-4-2? It's because there's not the players to play the modern tactical systems, partly of course because they're not as tactically sophisticated as their foreign cousins. What formation did pretty much all of the last 8 play at the WC? 4-2-3-1. The English/British players may certainly compliment the best teams in the English leagues, but only because players have had to be brought in from abroad to fill the other gaps. And Paul Scholes has only been a 'playmaker' since his legs went, so he doesn't count! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanzim Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 they had left sided players but none good enough at the top level. Why was he playing for Chelsea then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inkstier Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 The teams definitely aren't rigid, and besides, how many generations do you plan on see coming through? Most people are lucky to see an entire new generation, so unless you are the kind of person who makes it to 2100 in every single save I'm not quite sure what you are complaining about. Sorry, let me clarify. I meant if that's how FM was as a hard rule, it would get stale and boring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koki Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 I noticed that players from South America are more often described as 'Temperamental' than other players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzsam Posted July 13, 2010 Share Posted July 13, 2010 And I notice that while top English players' technique is very high, their flair is often below 5. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon army 06 Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 Ha! Barry is not a deep lying midfielder, he's a decent ball winning midfielder at best, and yeah ok I'll give you Carrick but that's it - and he's not trusted at the highest level apparently. Britain doesn't produce deep lying midfielders the way the rest of Europe/the world does.How many kids in the UK grow up playing as a deep lying midfielder? None I bet. Why have England's 2 foreign coaches resorted to 4-4-2? It's because there's not the players to play the modern tactical systems, partly of course because they're not as tactically sophisticated as their foreign cousins. What formation did pretty much all of the last 8 play at the WC? 4-2-3-1. The English/British players may certainly compliment the best teams in the English leagues, but only because players have had to be brought in from abroad to fill the other gaps. And Paul Scholes has only been a 'playmaker' since his legs went, so he doesn't count! what scholes has been 1 for years thats how he made his name as a xavi type player with more goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlo116 Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 Correct me if i'm wrong but i never really though scholes was a deep lying playmaker, but more of an advanced playmaker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dees-Blake Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 I always just referred to him as an ugly ginger... /mancity Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
athos Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 I've been managing East Asian countries and tall defenders are very rare. Most of them have jumping below 10 at peak. Heading is a lot better though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krald Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 I find scotland seems to produce good-quality defenders, strikers, and central midfielders but never any wingers, and few goalkeepers, but of course, I'm "only" on 2025, this could change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon army 06 Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 Correct me if i'm wrong but i never really though scholes was a deep lying playmaker, but more of an advanced playmaker. yea he was but hes a deep lying 1 now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Drundrige Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 what scholes has been 1 for years thats how he made his name as a xavi type player with more goals. Nah, he was an attacking midfielder with a slightly less box-to-box remit as Roy Keane. He's gradually morphed into a deep-lying playmaker as he's gotten older because of the physical issue I referred to earlier, and because of how United have amended their shape and their style of play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.