priest Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 For me in FM10, a big flaw IMO was about how you recieve money from transfers. I sold Kevin Thomson, kris Boyd , madjid bougherra. Collecting around £12-13 million. Although it is nice to be able to spend the money, Rangers were in debt. I would have liked to have an option of putting all the millions toward seeing off the debt, or all to a budget. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimbobWWFC Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 I think this is up to the board. If you receive loads of money (i.e. more than £12m-£13m) your board will choose to pay off parts of the debt in lump sums, but i imagine you would need lots more than £13m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
priest Posted July 27, 2010 Author Share Posted July 27, 2010 I think this is up to the board. If you receive loads of money (i.e. more than £12m-£13m) your board will choose to pay off parts of the debt in lump sums, but i imagine you would need lots more than £13m. I know but in real life Rangers go toward the debt when recievimg even £2.8 million Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trents Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 What Jimbob said. This is Football Manager and decisions like that are made a lot higher up. I look forward to the release of 'Football Chairman' where you can design the style of your ground and eat prawn sarnies during matchday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DANNY1000000 Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 What Jimbob said. This is Football Manager and decisions like that are made a lot higher up.I look forward to the release of 'Football Chairman' where you can design the style of your ground and eat prawn sarnies during matchday. Steady on, I think you made your point before the second paragraph! Do you just put comments like this on because people have done it to you in the past? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trents Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 Steady on, I think you made your point before the second paragraph! Do you just put comments like this on because people have done it to you in the past? Perhaps you'd rather I made the smiley face a bit bigger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 I think this should be something you can ask the board to do. They sometimes do it but it's quite rare even if you have a lot of money in the bank. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrazT Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 Lets keep this civil guys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekman Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 I think this should be something you can ask the board to do. They sometimes do it but it's quite rare even if you have a lot of money in the bank. Instead of asking the board it is something I think they should do automatically then then tell you they've done it. For example if you are a club in massive debt i.e 100m or more then I think if you sell a player for something like 30m then once the transfer is complete you could get message from the board saying something like 'In an effort to pay off the clubs debts more rapidly 20m of the previous transfer has been set aside. Thank you for your continued co-operation in this matter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
priest Posted July 27, 2010 Author Share Posted July 27, 2010 But I know it may be unrealistic, but if you think about it, it is. In fm a bank should take charge, like rfc, set money towwardd paying off the debt. And chairman could step down at any point like real life. In fact the bank would sanction sales without managers consent, and manager could hut out and threaten to quit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.