Church CM Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 This is my first attempt at making a training schedule for FM 2011. So far I am pretty pleased with the results and thought I would offer it to the community. I would love some feed back after you have given it a serious trial. ==================================================================================== Version 1.1: http://www.filefront.com/17497025/FM2011 - Black Hearts Training 1.1.tsh.zip (Reduced Physical a tad - reduce player complaints) Version 1.0: http://www.filefront.com/17490792/FM2011---Black-Hearts-Training-1.0.tsh.7z/ http://www.filefront.com/17490847/FM2011_BlackHearts_Training_v1.0.zip Neither version seems to create injuries. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Church CM Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share Posted November 7, 2010 Forgot to mention the Positions (1 set each for Full time and Youth) 09 - BH - ST/FC 08 - BH - AM RL 07 - BH - AM C 06 - BH - WING 05 - BH - M C 04 - BH - DMC 03 - BH - FB 02 - BH - DC 01 - BH - GK Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusader12 Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 What is the difference between wing and amrl ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Church CM Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share Posted November 7, 2010 Wing has a little more a aerobic ... I have a few players that seem to tire more frequently in the wings so it's an attempt to increase that. There is not that much difference between the two to be honest. I have a tendency to make training programs a little more specific to players rather than sides. This was an attempt to whittle that down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
urbanjunkie Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 What kind of results you getting? Masses of upwards green arrows across the board? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
crusader12 Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Thanks? Which would you say is more for the inside forward type player? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
urbanjunkie Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Also, I see they schedules are heavy. Any issues with player complaints and injuries? Cheers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
urbanjunkie Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 Thanks? Which would you say is more for the inside forward type player? I play Lennon and Bale as inside forwards. I've placed them both in the AM RL schedule rather than the Wingers. Although, depending on feedback - might move them across to wingers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfgrigg Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 What kind of results you getting? Masses of upwards green arrows across the board? Lots of improvement to player attributes at the same time are not the result of training and do not show that one training schedule is better than another (although the training schedule will have an impact on which particular attributes are improved). This is caused by a significant increase in a player's CA, often seen in youngsters who play (and do well) in their first games with the first-team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Church CM Posted November 7, 2010 Author Share Posted November 7, 2010 I would say the AM RL but that is really dependent on the players abilities. In regards to injuries and complaints, I have seen a slight drop from being happy to generally pleased and no major injuries as of yet. I am keeping a close eye on that as I trial them on a new season. The training is just one tick into heavy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
urbanjunkie Posted November 7, 2010 Share Posted November 7, 2010 /\ Thanks re: both replies /\ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
urbanjunkie Posted November 11, 2010 Share Posted November 11, 2010 Have yet to progress long enough into the game to see any positives or negatives with this. Anyone else got any feedback? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pintokhan Posted November 12, 2010 Share Posted November 12, 2010 Can anyone share some results using these schedules? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Church CM Posted November 13, 2010 Author Share Posted November 13, 2010 Hey, I have had good results with 1.1 and am pleased with the training overall but there is a little tweaking I am sure that can be done for individual players. I have been trying out this set (http://community.sigames.com/showthread.php/236167-FM11-Rekluse-s-Positional-Training-Schedules) by Rekluse in another save ... I like his approach, much more in depth by position and style of play. I think there needs to be more time to actually play to see how they are all shaking out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_russian Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 sum other results? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.