fmgod1 Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Hello gents. I started a new database edited by myself to introduce some wonderkids into the game, however, the players I had edited were not the quality I had put them at. I had put some players from the same club as -10 and was wondering if this was why it didn't work. Is there a limit? thanks for any help. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 the players I had edited were not the quality I had put them at What do you mean by this exactly? A PA of -10 gives players a PA from between 170 and 200, the scouts/coaches you use to give star ratings of potential have a degree of error depending on how good their "judging player potential" rating is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmgod1 Posted June 4, 2013 Author Share Posted June 4, 2013 I opened the editor and changed alot of players potential ability to -10.... When I saved it and started a new game only some of the players I edited had very high potential and some I had edited were not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Did you actually enable your db/edt files before starting a new game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fmgod1 Posted June 4, 2013 Author Share Posted June 4, 2013 Yes, Ackter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phelix Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 The star rating you see is not a complete indicator of their exact potential ability score. Did you happen to adjust the mental stats that are critical to a player reaching their potential? If not they will likely be random and as such may mean that even though a player has a 185 PA he may be unlikely to reach it, and your scout can see this and rates him at 4* as a consequence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.