Zeonflux Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Hey people, Following the news of Man Utd buying Mata it occurred to me once my excitement died down as to whether or not I was more excited that my team had brought a quality player like Mata or if I was more excited that it meant that following the next update of I start a new career as Utd that they had another quality midfielder AND I won't have to spent part of my transfer budget on another one and it could be spent on other players. So my question is this: Are you more excited that the real team buys then or because you can spend you budget on other things in the game? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebbo Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Typically I'm more excited about the real life aspect of it. As a Leeds fan we need all the real life help we can get, and often the in-game versions of our new signings aren't anything to get worked up about, I usually end up replacing them fairly soon anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garethjohn79 Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Do in-game transfer budgets reflect what a Club has spent IRL? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TacticalGenius Posted January 26, 2014 Share Posted January 26, 2014 Do in-game transfer budgets reflect what a Club has spent IRL? Usually, yes. And to answer the OP's question, I very rarely play FM with the side I support (Arsenal) but if we get Draxler, on top of what we already have, both FM and reality will be very exciting! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.