ujlien Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Hi i'm using the 98-99 retro DB from ehmtheblueline.com. And i've just realized that there might be a bug. I usualy offer front loaded contract to UFA. I really dont know if it's more effective than a regular contract but yeah, i still do it. With the 98-99 DB i've offered a foward a 3 years contract with a salary breakdown like this : 2 000 000 / 1 300 000 / 1 000 000 + singing bonus so the average cap hit would be 1.5 millions. On the last year of his contract i've traded him. After a while i've looked at his cap hit it was 1 222 222 (1 million of his final year + singning bonus / 3). Here is an example : I'm playing the Yotes and i've traded Pellerin to MTL in the off season. Here is his CAP HIT : 1 800 000 in phx Here is his CAP HIT with MTL shouldn't his cap hit carried over to mtl ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IvanIvanovich Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Not the signing fees, I think. This must be covered in the CBA http://www.nhl.com/nhl/en/v3/ext/CBA2012/NHL_NHLPA_2013_CBA.pdf You can look it up there for a definitive answer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nino-33 Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 FYI this has been discussed at TBL too (with no "definitive conclusion" reached) http://www.ehmtheblueline.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=16928 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujlien Posted August 7, 2016 Author Share Posted August 7, 2016 15 minutes ago, IvanIvanovich said: Not the signing fees, I think. This must be covered in the CBA http://www.nhl.com/nhl/en/v3/ext/CBA2012/NHL_NHLPA_2013_CBA.pdf You can look it up there for a definitive answer. You might be right about the singing fee. but there is still a big difference between the two cap hit seen on the two pictures. (600k) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asher413 Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Ivan- the '98/'99 databas uses the 2005 CBA, not 2013. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IvanIvanovich Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 1 hour ago, Asher413 said: Ivan- the '98/'99 databas uses the 2005 CBA, not 2013. I missed that :-) You'll have to google for the correct link. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.