wateronglass Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 I've been in many situations where I offer a contract to a player, think their demands are reasonable and we finalise the discussion...but then someone else comes in and makes an offer. They mull it over for about a week, but you see they've joined one of the other clubs, often a lower reputation than yours, because they offered a better contract. Well, damn, I could have paid you that much too if you asked me! So why doesn't it become more dynamic, and the player/agent can come back and say, 'hey, x are offering y, match them and I will still consider joining you'. They could mention exact details of the contract, just the important aspects, or even vagaries, depending on personality and other factors? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adzke Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 I think this is a good idea. The agent could bring back counter demands. This could apply to transfer negotiations as well. Clubs often just accept a lot of similar bids on players, whereas in real life, they would try to use the interest of other clubs to start a bidding war for a player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Yes I like this suggestion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
who_is_it Posted December 17, 2016 Share Posted December 17, 2016 It's a good suggestion and it will be realistic if they ask you better than the other team offer so , better than the first offer you made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Neil Brock Posted January 4, 2017 Administrators Share Posted January 4, 2017 Reviewed so locked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.