alanhutton2cafuwho? Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 hey guys ill justr get right to the point Chelsea have just offered 10.5 million plus 50% sell on clause for Micah Richards should I go for it or not ? also who could I get to replace him and I need a Dm first season on original patch btw Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanhutton2cafuwho? Posted June 2, 2008 Author Share Posted June 2, 2008 also I have the chance to get Hutton should i go for it ? I know how to get him playing really well with the system I play and he gets a lot of assists. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 No way, you can get 40m +30% sell on, and Chelsea aren't going to sell him anytime soon if you sell him to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonahno6 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 reject!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 Oh and don't play him at DM, play him at DR he's possibky best in the world there after a couple of seasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dexta200 Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 why the hell would you even consider that? hutton is much worse than richards at right back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanhutton2cafuwho? Posted June 2, 2008 Author Share Posted June 2, 2008 Im playing Richards centre half ! I know it was a stupid question lol I obviously rejected Adamj11 Im not playing him DM I need a dm to fit into my system ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jhilly Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 Hamsik comes good, Migel Veloso is fantasic, Bolozini is a future star and Grella is a good shout if you cant attract/afford big names. All DMs by the way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.