Is tactical familiarity shared amongst known tactics?

[MatchWinner]

The title may sound vague but this is hard to explain, so I'll use an example:

If Tactic A is focussed on possession (short passing) and Tactic B is more adventurous (direct passing), what is the effect on my players familiarity if I adjust Tactic A to direct passing during a match?  Are my players 100% comfortable with this change because they know this well from Tactic B or are they slightly worse because they don't normally play like this when they play with Tactic A?

[craigd84]

I would like to know this too, as i train 3 different mentalities.

[MatchWinner]

No one is able to answer this?  This has a big effect on my thinking during a match.  I'd be much more willing to make tactical changes during matches if I knew for sure I wasn't screwing up my player's tactical familiarity.

[Guest]

The TF graphic on the tactics screen will answer your questions.

If the only difference between tactics A & B is the passing focus & both are 100% it should mean that changing A to match the passing of B will not see a reduction in the TF rating.

If it does that’s a new bit of code for SI to write, my obvious question is why not Just switch to tactic B rather than change tactic A to match tactic B?

[MatchWinner]

3 minutes ago, Barside said:

my obvious question is why not Just switch to tactic B rather than change tactic A to match tactic B?

Because the two tactics may have many other differences so I might not want to completely change my tactical approach, just one instruction (like more adventurous passing if my team isn't quite creating enough chances).

I think you may have answered my question in a way.  I suppose I need to just get used to seeing which changes affect the familiarity on the tactics screen because you can't see it once you're in a match as far as I know.