Is SI supports illegal annexation of Crimea?

[Xeewaj Q.]

I really don't like to raise this issue here, but I have no other choice. There is a wonderful topic:

Where you can see even more wonderful

Quote

Crimea: 1st division, Cup, Super Cup

Which violated the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262:

Spoiler

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 March 2014

[without reference to a Main Committee (A/68/L.39 and Add.1)]

68/262. Territorial integrity of Ukraine

The General Assembly,

Reaffirming the paramount importance of the Charter of the United Nations in the promotion of the rule of law among nations,

Recalling the obligations of all States under Article 2 of the Charter to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, and to settle their international disputes by peaceful means,

Recalling also its resolution 2625 (XXV) of 24 October 1970, in which it approved the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, and reaffirming the principles contained therein that the territory of a State shall not be the object of acquisition by another State resulting from the threat or use of force, and that any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and territorial integrity of a State or country or at its political independence is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter,

Recalling further the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, signed in Helsinki on 1 August 1975, the Memorandum on Security Assurances in Connection with Ukraine’s Accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (Budapest Memorandum) of 5 December 1994,^[1] the Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Partnership between Ukraine and the Russian Federation of 31 May 1997^[2] and the Alma-Ata Declaration of 21 December 1991,

Stressing the importance of maintaining the inclusive political dialogue in Ukraine that reflects the diversity of its society and includes representation from all parts of Ukraine,

Welcoming the continued efforts by the Secretary-General and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and other international and regional organizations to support de-escalation of the situation with respect to Ukraine, Noting that the referendum held in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol on 16 March 2014 was not authorized by Ukraine,

1. Affirms its commitment to the sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders;
2. Calls upon all States to desist and refrain from actions aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine, including any attempts to modify Ukraine’s borders through the threat or use of force or other unlawful means;
3. Urges all parties to pursue immediately the peaceful resolution of the situation with respect to Ukraine through direct political dialogue, to exercise restraint, to refrain from unilateral actions and inflammatory rhetoric that may increase tensions and to engage fully with international mediation efforts;
4. Welcomes the efforts of the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and other international and regional organizations to assist Ukraine in protecting the rights of all persons in Ukraine, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities;
5. Underscores that the referendum held in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol on 16 March 2014, having no validity, cannot form the basis for any alteration of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or of the city of Sevastopol;
6. Calls upon all States, international organizations and specialized agencies not to recognize any alteration of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol on the basis of the above-mentioned referendum and to refrain from any action or dealing that might be interpreted as recognizing any such altered status.

 

I reported that post, but some moderator replied that it's perfectly fine. No, it's not.

I want to know an official SI position about this. Do you support illegal annexation of Crimea? If not, remove that content and ban the topic opener.

 

[grff]

Your referring to a file that someone has created themselves, not SI.

I could add Hitler into my db (clearly I wouldn’t) which SI have no control over.

[Xeewaj Q.]

3 minutes ago, grff said:

Your referring to a file that someone has created themselves, not SI.

I could add Hitler into my db (clearly I wouldn’t) which SI have no control over.

They should remove any content which violates international laws. Period.

[themadsheep2001]

It doesn't violate international law. Because it's a game and not real life. 

[Xeewaj Q.]

1 minute ago, themadsheep2001 said:

It doesn't violate international law. Because it's a game and not real life. 

I sense a lawyer.

[themadsheep2001]

Just now, Xeewaj Q. said:

I sense a lawyer.

If you're going to be facetious, the thread will be closed. As it stands, no law has been broken, nor is it discrimatory or hateful. Very little grounds for it being deleted or the user banned. 

[Xeewaj Q.]

8 minutes ago, themadsheep2001 said:

If you're going to be facetious, the thread will be closed. As it stands, no law has been broken, nor is it discrimatory or hateful. Very little grounds for it being deleted or the user banned. 

Occupant's flag near the annexed territory's title is not discriminatory or hateful? What a hypocrisy.

What about this:

UN report details grave human rights violations in Russian-occupied Crimea

or this:

The mystery of a missing Crimean Tatar

or that:

Russia attacks, seizes Ukrainian vessels in Black Sea off Crimea

?

Or you don't care?

[Jimbokav1971]

16 minutes ago, Xeewaj Q. said:

They should remove any content which violates international laws. Period.

It's a game. 

[DominicForza]

The Editor Hideaway has long had "fantasy" leagues and nations.  

 

In the past there have been Soviet Union file, and perhaps even an Eastern-Bloc (can't recall if I saw that done, or just discussed).

 

 

[santy001]

What a bizarre post, that is amazingly immature to make. I'll never understand this because it clearly provides no basis to infer anything about SI's position. 

If you can't grasp it, then you really need to stop playing as Norwich City on FM. Because do a bit of digging on Britain. You can find some right shocking things past and present that will make you feel terrible for ever daring to have embraced a team from such a country. 

In fact, there probably isn't any country you could play in on FM. I'm sure everyone will have done something negative at some point in time and it would be awfully hypocritical to decide the only ones that count are in your own preferred time frame.

 

[Xeewaj Q.]

3 minutes ago, DominicForza said:

The Editor Hideaway has long had "fantasy" leagues and nations.  

 

In the past there have been Soviet Union file, and perhaps even an Eastern-Bloc (can't recall if I saw that done, or just discussed).

 

 

You don't understand the difference between long-dead soviet union and occupied at present Crimea?

[themadsheep2001]

5 minutes ago, Xeewaj Q. said:

Occupant's flag near the annexed territory's title is not discriminatory or hateful? What a hypocrisy.

What about this:

UN report details grave human rights violations in Russian-occupied Crimea

or this:

The mystery of a missing Crimean Tatar

or that:

Russia attacks, seizes Ukrainian vessels in Black Sea off Crimea

?

Or you don't care?

again none of these real life incidents have a bearing on a fantasy league in a game.  Going to close this now, as you have no intention in listening either here or in the original thread 

Thanks