sczerpak Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 how the player ratings are set now. 6.7...what is that about? the simple 6,7,8,9 ratings were fine. just alot better to look at more than ought i know people have been angry so if you disagree, please take it easy! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neji Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I think it is just something you need to get used to. I didn't like them at first but after playing FM today, I think it's fine. It's also much better to judge how well you're playersare doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sczerpak Posted November 15, 2008 Author Share Posted November 15, 2008 ok il give it time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I'm comfortable with it. I just think that the ratings tend to be a bit harsh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ting2004 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I didn't like them at first but know I really like them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl87 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 I didn't like them at first but know I really like them. Same with me. I couldn't rate my players personally after a few matches because of it, but I am picking it up now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 In the past 6 could have meant 5.5 or 6.4, and that's a massive discrepency that I'm glad no longer exists. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmfaria Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 tbh, I love it. It's something I always wanted in the game (other thing is stats going from 1-100 instead of 1-20) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshmay07 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 i think the 6.1 and 6.7 etc is ace cus you can tell if a player is performing closer to a 7 or a very low six Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thats Mr Whiting to you Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 IMO, in previous games too many players had the same rating, i think its good to have .something... it lets you no (even more) whos playin well, even when your winning by a large margin (or playin badly when ur losing) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy38 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Personally I'd rather have the more wider-covering one digit ratings, as in the end I think I can decide how much better or worse one player has been playing compared to another. I might think someone with 6.3 has been playing better than the 6.8, but if they were both 6 I'd know they were both doing average (although really that should be 5 >_>) and still be able to compare. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Personally I'd rather have the more wider-covering one digit ratings, as in the end I think I can decide how much better or worse one player has been playing compared to another. I might think someone with 6.3 has been playing better than the 6.8, but if they were both 6 I'd know they were both doing average (although really that should be 5 >_>) and still be able to compare. Why would you think someone with a 6.3 rating would be playing better than someone with 6.8? I'm confuzzled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter-evo Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Why would you think someone with a 6.3 rating would be playing better than someone with 6.8? I'm confuzzled. HaHa and me I think it is much better as I can tell the difference between average and poor and it helps me decide where to make changes, both tactical and player wise Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozzy38 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Because it can be down to opinion. Computers don't have perception and opinions, certaintly not to our extent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJJOEYT Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 precision is a great thing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike7077 Posted November 15, 2008 Share Posted November 15, 2008 Because it can be down to opinion. Computers don't have perception and opinions, certaintly not to our extent. I can see your point. I often disagree with the ratings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.