Guest Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Curious to know what your preference is and why. Are you going for 3d or 2d? Full or Commentary only? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vara Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 2D Extended Highlights(except for when im analysing tactic closely) i've been using 2D forever and generally trust what i'm seeing more compared to what the 3D gfx manages to spit out. Find 3D hard to watch. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Wright 747 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 3D (2D for post match analysis) full match Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grifty Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 3D extended highlights for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Etebaer Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 3D Extended Highlights - you not only can see how many things unfold but also the frequency of highlight, who has possesion at the start and who in the end gets the Chance and how are telling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve8066 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 3d full, always have done. For me its easier to spot things that might be wrong or see weak areas in the opposition etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruntonpasty Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 3D Full match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halofon Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Less important matches 2d. CL and important matches in 3D to have more realistic feeling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger666 Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 It's the same match engine. If you mean the view, I use 2D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoGdy Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 Always 2D Extended Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roykela Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 3D sideline, comprehensive highlights. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImDaWeasel Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 2D extended. Even if they pulled out Fifa style 3D graphics I'd still use 2D. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icy Posted January 10, 2020 Share Posted January 10, 2020 2D comprehensive at the start of the game, once I see how both my team and the other team are playing, I tweak the tactic if needed and then 2D extended. I can't stand 3D as I find the representation very poor and full of weird animations, also with 2D I can see better the tactics and players movement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehig2 Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 23 hours ago, Halofon said: Less important matches 2d. CL and important matches in 3D to have more realistic feeling. Ahhh yes many a time I've turned on Sky to watch a not so important game and watched it in 2D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigcwwe Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 2D extended (Comprehensive if developing a new tactic) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigcwwe Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 On 10/01/2020 at 19:01, ImDaWeasel said: 2D extended. Even if they pulled out Fifa style 3D graphics I'd still use 2D. If they ever stopped having the 2D option in the game I'd stop buying it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now