Zellix Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Hi there. I was just doing some window shopping on expiring contracts and noticed Pasanen and Zaccardo are approachable. They were both ace in 07 but I was wondering in 08 which one would be better at RB? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet-Zombie-Jesus Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 Pasanen is a CB and is a crap RB.I say sign both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthonyoxx Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 zaccardo is the better rb and can also do a very good job as a cb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan 7 Posted June 26, 2008 Share Posted June 26, 2008 zaccardo is by far the better rb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaunyboy89 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 I signed Pasanen for Portsmouth to replace Sol Campbell and he was a load of pants for the whole season! Ended up selling him for a really reduced price to West Brom. i'd say go for Zaccardo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluenose_92 Posted June 27, 2008 Share Posted June 27, 2008 Pasanen is a good CB, Zaccardo is an Immense RB. Pluck for Zaccardo if you only want a RB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo_the_red Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Zaccardo all the way....very realiable and scores a few with his head. Helped my AC Milan team win the CL 3 years out of 5 his AVR never dropped below 7.25 for 5 years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommo12345 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 Has to be zaccardo all day he woops pasanen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dexta200 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 zaccardo definately and if you dont even play him you can get at least 10m for him! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.