Jump to content

Champions League Registration Rules


josephedwardharrison
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think it would be nice to use the same registration rules as UEFA do in real life.

Currently, in FM22 you have to include at least 8 home grown players and at least 4 of those have to be trained by the club.

The UEFA rules actually stipulate that you register two lists of players and the home grown rules are slightly different.

Firstly, you must submit List A. List A can contain up to 25 players, of which at least 8 must be ‘locally trained’. This list can be decremented accordingly if you are unable to register 8 ‘locally trained’ players.

A ‘locally trained’ player refers to either a player on your club’s books or another club’s books from the same football association. The player must have spent at least 3 years on these books between the ages of 15 and 21.

The second list, List B, is submitted at a later date and can contain players born after 2000, and has been eligible to play for the club for an uninterrupted period at least two years.

Implementing the above functionality into the registration rules in FM would allow more flexibility when it comes to squad building.

It would eradicate the need to purchase players trained by the club for registration purposes. The UEFA rules do not stipulate that you must have at least 4 players trained by the club, they simply imply that the player must fit the ‘locally trained’ criteria, which means the player can be trained in the nation or by the club.

Also, when submitting players for List A, the UEFA rules allow you to loan the player out for playing experience whilst also building up their eligibility criteria. Often in FM, the player’s potential is wasted rotting in the under 23’s whilst you wait for their eligibility criteria to build. 

I often thought how teams got away with this because I assumed FM’s rules were the same as UEFA’s and I couldn’t recall 8 home grown players from most Champions League squads in recent times. Obviously, now I understand they’ll often register fewer players as they can’t fulfil the ‘locally trained’ player criteria.

Here is a link to the UEFA registration information I used as source material, https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/news/026c-12ed33745f21-a63cc70aaed6-1000--champions-league-group-stage-squads-player-registration-deadlin/

Link to post
Share on other sites

The article you provided has mislead you as it simplifies the rules a bit. The registration rules you see in the game are actually the A list rules, while the B list isn't necessary as the game correctly allows you to play club-trained players without registering them for UEFA competitions. Here are this year's UCL regulations for reference: https://documents.uefa.com/r/Regulations-of-the-UEFA-Champions-League-2022/23/Article-45-Player-lists-Online

Look up article 45 where everything is explained in detail.

 

However, it would be great if SI fixed points 45.07 and 45.08 as I suggested in a bug report I made a while ago. The deadlines and the number of subsequently registered players needs fixing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for providing the more verbose documentation! It looks as though the registration rules are pretty much accurate, apart from the exceptions you mentioned.

So, regarding point 45.06, the official documentation states that you can register less players in List A if you cannot meet the criteria for registering locally trained players. I know Manchester City registered 21 players in their CL squad last season, and presumably they have more than 8 players on their books that qualify as locally trained, so why doesn’t FM just allow you to register less players if you can’t meet the criteria or your ‘locally trained’ players aren’t ready for the first team?

The documentation point 45.04 also stipulates that players trained by the club can be on the books for a three year period, continuous or not. As far as I’m aware, when you loan out a player on FM, the ‘trained at club’ days pauses until they return. It makes sense to allow them to be loaned out because it’s not beneficial to anyone to keep a young player rotting in the under 23’s, stunting their potential when they could be getting first team football temporarily elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...