_mxrky Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 In my opinion this should be a customisable option. There’s no reason why move into channels should be a forced preset for all st roles except for false nine and poacher. I want my advanced forward for example to stay in the central channel and do everything an advanced forward would do apart from running the channels what is Si’s logic behind this because I don’t understand it at all. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarJ Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, _mxrky said: I want my advanced forward for example to stay in the central channel and do everything an advanced forward would do apart from running the channels then you need a poacher. The description you gave sounds to me more like a poacher than an advanced forward Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mxrky Posted September 23, 2022 Author Share Posted September 23, 2022 Just now, DarJ said: then you need a poacher. The description you gave sounds to me more like a poacher than an advanced forward Well not really because poachers have dribble less and take fewer risks hard coded Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarJ Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 3 minutes ago, _mxrky said: Well not really because poachers have dribble less and take fewer risks hard coded fair point. you can give a trait to your AF to tell him not to move into channels 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
herne79 Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 Always remember that just because a player has an instruction hard coded (or asked to do so by us managers as an optional PI) doesn’t mean they’ll always be doing it. They’ll just try to do so a bit more often. And even then that’ll only happen without other external influences, for example a player’s position in a formation (such as a lone striker in the STC position vs two strikers at STCL/R). There are loads of factors which will have an influence on player behaviour. To answer the question re. SI’s logic it’s because that’s how strikers tend to be trained in real life. One of the skills they learn is running the channels but, as described above, they won’t always look to run the channels - it’s just one of the weapons in their arsenal and won’t be used all the time. In terms of asking the question, have you therefore noticed issues on the pitch with your Advanced Forward’s movement? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mxrky Posted September 23, 2022 Author Share Posted September 23, 2022 (edited) 39 minutes ago, herne79 said: Always remember that just because a player has an instruction hard coded (or asked to do so by us managers as an optional PI) doesn’t mean they’ll always be doing it. They’ll just try to do so a bit more often. And even then that’ll only happen without other external influences, for example a player’s position in a formation (such as a lone striker in the STC position vs two strikers at STCL/R). There are loads of factors which will have an influence on player behaviour. To answer the question re. SI’s logic it’s because that’s how strikers tend to be trained in real life. One of the skills they learn is running the channels but, as described above, they won’t always look to run the channels - it’s just one of the weapons in their arsenal and won’t be used all the time. In terms of asking the question, have you therefore noticed issues on the pitch with your Advanced Forward’s movement? Advanced forward will often vacate the central channel in favour of running the channels which means I’m sometimes unable to combine centrally in the middle of the pitch. When I’m attacking all 5 channels I mostly want my striker staying central. In my opinion with move into channels drift too much to one side. Especially when I already have roles doing the exact same thing Edited September 23, 2022 by _mxrky Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poison Posted September 23, 2022 Share Posted September 23, 2022 So... Let me see if I get it right: You want a static advanced forward who will stay with his man instead of going a little bit to the side, then he will risk even more by trying to beat this man. Did I get it? Anyway to get serious, it's not the role that does this, it's the attack duty imo. It seems that you want someone with a support duty like dlf-su or pressing forward - su or f9. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mxrky Posted September 23, 2022 Author Share Posted September 23, 2022 2 hours ago, Poison said: So... Let me see if I get it right: You want a static advanced forward who will stay with his man instead of going a little bit to the side, then he will risk even more by trying to beat this man. Did I get it? Anyway to get serious, it's not the role that does this, it's the attack duty imo. It seems that you want someone with a support duty like dlf-su or pressing forward - su or f9. No what I want is a forward I’m that occupies the centre backs in the central channel predominantly without drifting to the sides to much. Basically a false nine in terms of its positioning vertically, but with a higher mentality Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kung Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 15 hours ago, _mxrky said: No what I want is a forward I’m that occupies the centre backs in the central channel predominantly without drifting to the sides to much. Basically a false nine in terms of its positioning vertically, but with a higher mentality can´t you tick in the option to hold position? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjericho Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 16 hours ago, _mxrky said: No what I want is a forward I’m that occupies the centre backs in the central channel predominantly without drifting to the sides to much. Basically a false nine in terms of its positioning vertically, but with a higher mentality A Poacher or a Target Man will do the job Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Rowell Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 On 23/09/2022 at 17:44, _mxrky said: No what I want is a forward I’m that occupies the centre backs in the central channel predominantly without drifting to the sides to much. Basically a false nine in terms of its positioning vertically, but with a higher mentality I think you might want a DLF(A)? But re. your original question, as has been said, the game reflects roles that are trained IRL. Another consideration - if SI allowed 100% customisation of roles and duties, it'd be impossible for AI "managers" to cope with that when playing your side as it'd be against infinite combinations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halbraum Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 4 saat önce, Lord Rowell said: But re. your original question, as has been said, the game reflects roles that are trained IRL. False Nine used to have the MIC instruction but DLFs didn't, now it's vice versa. For what reason SI decided to change that? I don't believe it was based on real-life training of the said roles. But i completely agree with the second point you made. Full customization would create a mess, however i think "Move Into Channels" should not be something that is locked-in for vast majority of ST roles. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mxrky Posted November 25, 2022 Author Share Posted November 25, 2022 Bringing this up again and people might be right with poacher role. Although i wish take less risks and dribble more wasn’t hard coded. The way Richarlison played yesterday is pretty much what I’m looking for. He didn’t run the channels at all just stayed central Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LatZee Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 4 hours ago, _mxrky said: Bringing this up again and people might be right with poacher role. Although i wish take less risks and dribble more wasn’t hard coded. The way Richarlison played yesterday is pretty much what I’m looking for. He didn’t run the channels at all just stayed central Yeah, that didn't happen. Let's see his heatmap, conveniently compared to a striker who genuinely doesn't move wide, Mitrovic: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mxrky Posted November 25, 2022 Author Share Posted November 25, 2022 4 hours ago, LatZee said: Yeah, that didn't happen. Let's see his heatmap, conveniently compared to a striker who genuinely doesn't move wide, Mitrovic: Eh heatmaps aren’t everything. I watched the game he remained very central Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finners Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 11 hours ago, _mxrky said: Eh heatmaps aren’t everything. I watched the game he remained very central "Forget your damn science, I know what I can see! The Earth is FLAT I tell you!" 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
_mxrky Posted November 26, 2022 Author Share Posted November 26, 2022 1 hour ago, Finners said: "Forget your damn science, I know what I can see! The Earth is FLAT I tell you!" i mean that was si's response on the defensiv line experiment on fm23 so why not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themadsheep2001 Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 Richarlison ran the channels when the ball was central and deeper and there were no high wide options, but stayed central when the ball was high on the flanks. That's an advanced forward 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Marines Posted November 29, 2022 Share Posted November 29, 2022 (edited) Il 26/11/2022 in 12:46 , themadsheep2001 ha scritto: Richarlison ran the channels when the ball was central and deeper and there were no high wide options, but stayed central when the ball was high on the flanks. That's an advanced forward Yeah but in the game it happens AF goes on the channel with a mezzala(f.e.) when the ball is on the flank or a bit deeper. The question is not wrong. The most customizable role is probably the pressing forward on support, if it wasn't for the pressing instructions. Edited November 29, 2022 by Andrew Marines 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_hughes Posted November 29, 2022 Share Posted November 29, 2022 If a striker was static (especially an AF), they wouldn’t score much. An AF is by far the best role for a striker but you need to have creativity around him. MIC is an annoying instruction but as has been mentioned, most strikers IRL do that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Marines Posted November 29, 2022 Share Posted November 29, 2022 1 ora fa, michael_hughes ha scritto: If a striker was static (especially an AF), they wouldn’t score much. An AF is by far the best role for a striker but you need to have creativity around him. MIC is an annoying instruction but as has been mentioned, most strikers IRL do that. There aren't static strikers anymore irl(except for a few cases) but even in this situation, having someone that moves to the side to attack the channel could not be what op is thinking(cause the channels could be already occupied or simply cause he doesn't wanna lose the player up there centrally). Op just wanna have different options and that is totally fair 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_hughes Posted December 2, 2022 Share Posted December 2, 2022 On 29/11/2022 at 17:37, Andrew Marines said: There aren't static strikers anymore irl(except for a few cases) but even in this situation, having someone that moves to the side to attack the channel could not be what op is thinking(cause the channels could be already occupied or simply cause he doesn't wanna lose the player up there centrally). Op just wanna have different options and that is totally fair The OP says he wants his striker to stay central, which is what static is. If he did that, he’d have a lot more issues than having his striker move into channels. To create space, you need movement, both IRL and in game and working the channels does exactly that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Ace Posted December 2, 2022 Share Posted December 2, 2022 On 24/09/2022 at 10:03, kingjericho said: A Poacher or a Target Man will do the job Spot on On 23/09/2022 at 12:29, _mxrky said: In my opinion this should be a customisable option. There’s no reason why move into channels should be a forced preset for all st roles except for false nine and poacher. I want my advanced forward for example to stay in the central channel and do everything an advanced forward would do apart from running the channels what is Si’s logic behind this because I don’t understand it at all. A poacher Remember Traits affect the roles too, for example Troy Deeney "play with his back to goal" I regularly play him as a Poacher but because of that trait, he adds a little more to the role and will often drop off to link and "Poach" so that's a feasible way around locked PIs. In your case a striker with "tries killer balls" and "runs with ball often" would be a work around Maybe one for the requests boards but it's been requested before. A fully customisable striker role would be amazing but the AI have to use these roles too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitner Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 That's not on topic, but i wish we had an option (or trait) for lone strikers who goes to the far post everytime the ball is wide (like Ibra on Man Utd), that would create a interesting way of setting the wide plays for your teams (with isolation or overload) Cheers, Bitner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Marines Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 Il 2/12/2022 in 12:53 , michael_hughes ha scritto: The OP says he wants his striker to stay central, which is what static is. If he did that, he’d have a lot more issues than having his striker move into channels. To create space, you need movement, both IRL and in game and working the channels does exactly that. The discussion is not about wheter the striker has issues or not, it is about the fact that there's not an option to customize one to obtain the movements we want. Even a poacher moves to the channel if there's the possibility from time to time but i still can't understand why he should have "dribble less" hard-coded. This is just an example. Even Bitner's idea is good and is something we can't currently do in-game 4 ore fa, Bitner ha scritto: That's not on topic, but i wish we had an option (or trait) for lone strikers who goes to the far post everytime the ball is wide (like Ibra on Man Utd), that would create a interesting way of setting the wide plays for your teams (with isolation or overload) Cheers, Bitner We are just talking about opportunities Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now