joaquin87 Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 Can someone sort this list by importance? "was competitive" is worse than 'top half'? is better than 'mid-table'? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rusty217 Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 It's bad. As in it's usually used for teams that failed to get past the first stage. eg. you have a 4 team group with the top 2 going through. 3rd place would be "was competitive" 4th either "was competitive" too, or sometimes "no information". This is also only if it's the first round, if the group stage was after a bunch of qualifiers or something then you'd use "managed to qualify to this stage" instead. I'd only ever use it in cup competitions or qualifiers, not leagues so I wouldn't compare it to top half or mid table. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joaquin87 Posted October 5, 2022 Author Share Posted October 5, 2022 hace 16 horas, rusty217 dijo: It's bad. As in it's usually used for teams that failed to get past the first stage. eg. you have a 4 team group with the top 2 going through. 3rd place would be "was competitive" 4th either "was competitive" too, or sometimes "no information". This is also only if it's the first round, if the group stage was after a bunch of qualifiers or something then you'd use "managed to qualify to this stage" instead. I'd only ever use it in cup competitions or qualifiers, not leagues so I wouldn't compare it to top half or mid table. Thanks! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now