CCS Riley Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 i like advanced forwards and the idea of 2 strikers instead of 1 with the goal of getting more goals so i have switched from my 4-2-3-1 possession football to 4-2-4 but im trying both strikers as advanced forwards and im wondering if thats viable or just a dream i should wake up from and i should switch 1 of them to a different role? can 2 advanced strikers link up as well? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelvin782 Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 (edited) I’ve never been able to get this to work, especially in a 4-2-4, I think they get in each others way! My instant thought would be to try it in a diamond, with your most creative midfielder in an attacking midfield AP role just behind them. Let one of the AFs roam from his position and have the other set up as default, so they try and do different things to find space for your AP. Edited March 26, 2023 by Kelvin782 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunnerfan Posted March 26, 2023 Share Posted March 26, 2023 In any 2-striker set, you need strikers who will compliment each other, not compete with each other. In my 4-2-4, I have 1 AF/a paired with 1 PF/s. They make a fine 1-2 punch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phnompenhandy Posted March 27, 2023 Share Posted March 27, 2023 Can work very well at lower league level where defences are poor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantombandit Posted March 28, 2023 Share Posted March 28, 2023 It can work, but it isnt ideal. Advanced forwards are like playmakers, they attract the ball during finishing chances. Two finishers will create two people looking to do the same thing and playing in a very selfish manner. I would advise a more supporting role for the second striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ceefax the cat Posted March 28, 2023 Share Posted March 28, 2023 I had a great league-winning campaign with two AF's who didn't remotely get in each other's way. It was a 4-1-3-2 with the strikers each staying wide and the MC arriving in the box between them. They made a decent number of assists for each other. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now