yohanes1985 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Type: Laptop Model: ASUS Vivobook 14X CPU Model: AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS (8 Core 16 Thread, Q1'21) 35 Watt TDP CPU Base Frequency: 2.8 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 4.4 GHz RAM: 16GB DDR4 RAM Clockspeed: 3200 MHz (CL 22-22-22-52 1T) GPU: AMD Radeon(TM) Graphics (Vega) Cezanne 512 MB Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Storage Type: INTEL NVME 512GB Benchmark 1 FM24: 52 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 02 min 16 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 04 min 37 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 20 min 26 Sec 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theHDTreatment Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Type: Steam Deck Model: OLED 512gb CPU Model: Zen 2 4c/8t CPU Base Frequency: 2.4 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 3.5 GHz RAM: 16GB RAM Clockspeed: 6400MT/s GPU: Zen 2 Graphics Level in 3D: High Benchmark 1 FM24: 01 min 33 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 05 min 29 Sec 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theHDTreatment Posted January 20 Share Posted January 20 Type: Desktop Model: Z690 CPU Model: i7 13700k CPU Base Frequency: 3.4ghz P / 2.5ghz E CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.5ghz P core / 4.4ghz P core RAM: 32GB RAM Clockspeed: 3600Mhz CL16 GPU: 6800xt Graphics Level in 3D: Max Storage Type: NVME Benchmark 1 FM23: 37 sec Benchmark 1 FM24: 33 Sec Benchmark 2 FM23: 01 min 16 sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 01 min 13 Sec Benchmark 3 FM23: 05 min 29 sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 02 min 58 Sec! Benchmark 4 FM23: 11 min 12 sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 09 min 27 Sec 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scythian12 Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Type: Laptop Model: Asus ROG CPU Model: AMD Ryzen 5800H CPU Base Frequency: 3.20 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 3.20 GHz RAM: 16 GB RAM Clockspeed: 3200 MHz GPU: Geforce 3070 (Laptop, only 8 GB!) Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Benchmark 1 FM24: 01 min 5 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 02 min 38 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 05 min 47 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 23 min 24 Sec Then I installed 64 GB 3200 MHz RAM to get the results Benchmark 1 FM24: 00 min 59 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 02 min 32 Sec 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SI Staff EdL Posted January 23 SI Staff Share Posted January 23 expected really, unless your system was really pushed for free memory at 16GB increasing memory of the same speed isn't really going to make a difference. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scythian12 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Dunno, FM yoinks itself 11,5 GB, I thought it would take more if there was more scope for it. For instance, for the copious amount of extra graphics I use. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SI Staff EdL Posted January 24 SI Staff Share Posted January 24 No it doesn't really work like that, we don't scale memory usage based on whats available, it just uses what it needs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hovis Dexter Posted January 25 Share Posted January 25 Type: Desktop Model: Novatech PC-X009611 CPU Model: i7-9700H CPU Base Frequency: 3.60 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: ?? Sorry Don’t know how to find this let me know how and I look it up RAM: 64GB DDR4 RAM Clock speed: 2134.4 Mhz GPU: GeForce RTX 2070 Graphics Level in 3D: High Benchmark 1 FM24: 01 min 04 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 02 min 50 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 05 min 05 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 24 min 41 Sec 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hovis Dexter Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Type: Laptop Model: Dell XPS 15 9570 CPU Model: i9-8950HK CPU Base Frequency: 2.900 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: ?? Sorry don’t know how to find this let me know how and I’ll look it up RAM: 32GB DDR4 RAM Clock speed: 2660 Mhz GPU: GeForce RTX 1050Ti withMax-Q Design Graphics Level in 3D: High Benchmark 1 FM24: 01 min 20 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 05 min 02 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 06 min 16 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: gave up after 25 minutes when I was only on the 16th September 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Novem9 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Am I asking in the right topic? Are there any benchmarks for SteamDeck too? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pompeyboyz Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 12 minutes ago, Novem9 said: Am I asking in the right topic? Are there any benchmarks for SteamDeck too? Someone has posted at least one here 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arijit Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 On 26/11/2023 at 16:27, stevemc said: Type: Apple (This one) Model: 16" MacBook Pro M3 Max 1TB SSD CPU Model: 16-core RAM: 48GB GPU: 40-core Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Benchmark 1 FM24: 0 min 30 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 1 min 02 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 2 min 45 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 8 min 20 Sec (fans were grafting on this one ) Just upgraded from my M1 Mac Studio to this same model (in the US though) last week. Thanks for your numbers, you saved my time. I haven't installed Steam/FM24 yet but since I have Apple Arcade, I'm playing FMT24. It is so fast! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mellman Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 Type: Laptop Model: Notebook NH5x_7xRCx,RDx CPU Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9750H CPU @ 2.60GHz CPU Base Frequency: 2600 MHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 4500 MHz RAM: 16GB DDR4 RAM Clockspeed: 2128Mhz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Benchmark 1 FM23: XX min XX Sec Benchmark 1 FM24: 01 min 08 Sec Benchmark 2 FM23: XX min XX Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 03 min 33 Sec Benchmark 3 FM23: XX min XX Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 05 min 51 Sec 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abaddon879 Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 On 26/01/2024 at 15:44, Novem9 said: Am I asking in the right topic? Are there any benchmarks for SteamDeck too? A couple of posts above yours. On 20/01/2024 at 17:12, theHDTreatment said: Type: Steam Deck Model: OLED 512gb CPU Model: Zen 2 4c/8t CPU Base Frequency: 2.4 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 3.5 GHz RAM: 16GB RAM Clockspeed: 6400MT/s GPU: Zen 2 Graphics Level in 3D: High Benchmark 1 FM24: 01 min 33 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 05 min 29 Sec 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TopToffee Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Type: Apple Model: 14" MacBook Pro M3 Max 1TB SSD CPU Model: 14-core RAM: 36GB GPU: 30-core Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Benchmark 1 FM24: 0 min 31 sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 1 min 06 sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 2 min 33 sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 8min 50 sec weirdly benchmark 3 was faster than the 16 core model posted above. Ran it twice and was within a second each time 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arijit Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 55 minutes ago, TopToffee said: weirdly benchmark 3 was faster than the 16 core model posted above. Ran it twice and was within a second each time That is weird. New M3 Max 36GB models has less memory speed (300GB/s) than 16" 48GB model (400GB/s). Maybe he had few other background tasks running during benchmark - time machine backup etc. But overall I am happy. I had M1 Max studio and it could do 1-week progress in about 5 mins and with my new M3 Max 16" I can do it less than 3 mins (almost half sometimes), I can reach progress more in my limited game time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevez27 Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 This thread is super helpful so thank you @Brother Ben To all of the Mac users who report high and very high for graphics levels:- Does that include night matches when sky is black? I have an M1 MacBook Pro 16” and I can run the game in very high settings and it runs super smooth if it’s a daytime match but as soon as the match is at night with black sky and floodlights on, I get lag and this lag remains even with settings turned down to high and even medium Anybody else get the same? 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Ben Posted February 15 Author Share Posted February 15 (edited) Spreadsheet is updated 56 systems tested Massive thanks to all involved If anyone wants to create some kind of graphical thingy with the results that would be amazing as i'm crap with spreadsheets. Spreadsheet (Contains full details, Cores, Ram speed, Graphics cards etc) OVERVIEW - Combined --------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Edited February 16 by Brother Ben 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieTC13 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, Brother Ben said: Spreadsheet is updated 56 systems tested Massive thanks to all involved If anyone wants to create some kind of graphical thingy with the results that would be amazing as i'm crap with spreadsheets. Spreadsheet (Contains full details, Cores, Ram speed, Graphics cards etc) OVERVIEW - Steamdeck OVERVIEW - Combined --------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry to be annoying but my P-Cores are overclocked to 5.4ghz but it says 5.1 and the ecores are at 4.2ghz but thanks for the graph Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Ben Posted February 15 Author Share Posted February 15 2 minutes ago, JamieTC13 said: Sorry to be annoying but my P-Cores are overclocked to 5.4ghz but it says 5.1 and the ecores are at 4.2ghz but thanks for the graph I've changed it on the sreadsheet to 5.4 and i'll update the screenshots next time around. For Intel I only take the base and high of the P cores. This may change for FM25 etc moving forward 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mantorras77 Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 (edited) Type: Mini PC Model: GenMachine Ren5000 Mini PC ($234) CPU Model: Ryzen 7 5700U CPU Base Frequency: 1.80 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 4.30 GHz RAM: 16GB DDR4 RAM Clockspeed: 3200Mhz GPU: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 , 2 GB VRam Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Benchmark 1 FM24: 01 min 07 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 03 min 13 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 06 min 10 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 29 min 39 Sec Edited February 18 by mantorras77 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabo1990 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Type: Desktop Model: Custom CPU Model: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU Base Frequency: 4,2 Ghz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.7ghz RAM: 32GB RAM Clockspeed: 6000Mhz GPU: 16GB Gigabyte RTX4080 SUPER GAMING OC 4800 Graphics Level in 3D: Max Storage Type: SSD Benchmark 1 FM24: 35 sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 01 min 11 sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 02 min 40 sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 07 min 30 sec 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adyan27 Posted February 26 Share Posted February 26 Type: PC Model: - CPU Model: Ryzen 5 5600 CPU Base Frequency: 3.60 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 4.45 GHz RAM: 16GB RAM Clockspeed: 3000hz GPU: Geforce RTX 3060 12 GB Graphics Level in 3D: High Benchmark 1 FM24: 0 mins 48 sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 2 mins 21 sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 3 mins 55 sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 21 mins 40 sec 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hovis Dexter Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 Type: Desktop Model: PCSpecialist Intel Z790 DDR5 CPU Model: i7-14700KF CPU Base Frequency: 3.40 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.60 GHz RAM: 32GB DDR5 RAM Clock speed: 6000 Mhz GPU: GeForce RTX 4060 Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Benchmark 1 FM24: 00 min 32 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 01 min 06 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 02 min 43 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 08 min 05 Sec 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilani10 Posted April 5 Share Posted April 5 Type: Desktop Model: Custom CPU Model: Intel I5-13400F CPU Base Frequency: 2.5 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 4.6 GHz RAM: 16GB RAM Clockspeed: 3600Mhz GPU: GeForce RTX 4060Ti Graphics Level in 3D: High Bench 1 (FM24): 00 min 43 Sec. Bench 2 (FM24): 01 min 54 Sec. Bench 3 (FM24): 03 min 45 Sec. Bench 4 (FM24): 16 min 27 Sec. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bosque Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 Sorry, I just saw this thread. I don't understand how to benchmark my PC. Should I compare my time holidaying the week with the others in order to see if my pc is low, mid or high end? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Ben Posted May 2 Author Share Posted May 2 (edited) 8 hours ago, bosque said: Sorry, I just saw this thread. I don't understand how to benchmark my PC. Should I compare my time holidaying the week with the others in order to see if my pc is low, mid or high end? Yeah just do the benchmarks and write down your times in the format others have. The main aim of the thread is to help people decide whether or not to upgrade their system based on comparing their own results to the others posted here. It can also be a great diagnostic tool. If your results are significantly lower to a similar setup on our list then you will know you may have an issue. Your results will in turn help others as the more results we have the better it will be, either way your test results will be greatly appreciated. Edited May 2 by Brother Ben 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bosque Posted May 2 Share Posted May 2 5 hours ago, Brother Ben said: Yeah just do the benchmarks and write down your times in the format others have. The main aim of the thread is to help people decide whether or not to upgrade their system based on comparing their own results to the others posted here. It can also be a great diagnostic tool. If your results are significantly lower to a similar setup on our list then you will know you may have an issue. Your results will in turn help others as the more results we have the better it will be, either way your test results will be greatly appreciated. Great idea. I will do it when I have a little free time! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
netking Posted May 22 Share Posted May 22 Based on what I'm seeing, the game does not take full advantage of multiple cores. Am I mistaken? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwchriste Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 On 21/05/2024 at 23:56, netking said: Based on what I'm seeing, the game does not take full advantage of multiple cores. Am I mistaken? If you don't have many countries/leagues enabled and the detail is turned down, per-core performance probably helps more. If you like all leagues enabled and crank up the detail level, more cores is more important. The game is nice that way, since you can tune the game performance to fit your hardware (or buy better gear to match your desired performance). 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gothenburg83 Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 (edited) On 08/11/2023 at 22:14, gothenburg83 said: Type: Desktop Model: Asrock Z690 Extreme CPU Model: Intel 12900k CPU Base Frequency: 3.20 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.10 GHz RAM: 64GB Corsair Vengeance RAM Clockspeed: 3600 Mhz GPU: GeForce GTX 3080 12GB Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Storage: WD Black SN850X 4TB SSD Benchmark 1 FM23: 00 min 41 Sec Benchmark 1 FM24: 00 min 37 Sec Benchmark 2 FM23: 01 min 25 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 01 min 26 Sec Benchmark 3 FM23: 06 min 19 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 03 min 12 Sec Benchmark 4 FM23: 13 min 55 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 11 min 01 Sec Type: Desktop Model: Asrock Z790 PG Riptide CPU Model: Intel 14900k CPU Base Frequency: 3.20 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 6.00 GHz RAM: 64GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5 RAM Clockspeed: 6000 Mhz GPU: GeForce GTX 4080 16GB Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Storage: Samsung Pro 990 2TB SSD Benchmark 1 FM23: - Benchmark 1 FM24: 00 min 32 Sec Benchmark 2 FM23: - Benchmark 2 FM24: 01 min 00 Sec Benchmark 3 FM23: - Benchmark 3 FM24: 02 min 48 Sec Benchmark 4 FM23: - Benchmark 4 FM24: 07 min 45 Sec Updated for new hardware/setup Edited May 23 by gothenburg83 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lizard2771 Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 (edited) I renewed my drivers and bought a new graphic card.And now I'm over a minute faster in Benchmark 4 Type: Desktop Model: Custom CPU Model: R9 7950x CPU Base Frequency: 4.50 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.70 GHz Motherboard A620M RAM: 16GB RAM Clockspeed: 4800 Mhz GPU: AMD Radeon RX 6600 Graphics Level in 3D: High Storage Type: SSD (980 Pro) Benchmark 3 FM24: 03 min 09 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 8 min 36 Sec Edited May 27 by lizard2771 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmalove Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 (edited) Please there is a difference going from 32gb to 64gb ram with 7800x3d? Edited June 1 by kmalove Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pompeyboyz Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 58 minutes ago, kmalove said: Please there is a difference going from 32gb to 64gb ram with 7800x3d? Going from 32gb to 64gb won't have much impact at all. It is a CPU driven process that will mean a better CPU would make better performance. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abaddon879 Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 On 01/06/2024 at 08:56, kmalove said: Please there is a difference going from 32gb to 64gb ram with 7800x3d? The RAM capacity doesn't make any difference above about 16GB I believe, unless you are running a lot of other applications in the background while playing FM. There have been good gains when increasing speed however, so I would focus more on the speed of the RAM than capacity if you were looking to upgrade. On 01/06/2024 at 09:55, Pompeyboyz said: Going from 32gb to 64gb won't have much impact at all. It is a CPU driven process that will mean a better CPU would make better performance. As stated here, it is CPU intensive so the best gains would be by a CPU upgrade. The next gen of Ryzen are due to drop in July, so maybe keep an eye out for those if you are considering an upgrade. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abaddon879 Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 (edited) On 27/05/2024 at 12:58, lizard2771 said: I renewed my drivers and bought a new graphic card.And now I'm over a minute faster in Benchmark 4 Type: Desktop Model: Custom CPU Model: R9 7950x CPU Base Frequency: 4.50 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.70 GHz Motherboard A620M RAM: 16GB RAM Clockspeed: 4800 Mhz GPU: AMD Radeon RX 6600 Graphics Level in 3D: High Storage Type: SSD (980 Pro) Benchmark 3 FM24: 03 min 09 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 8 min 36 Sec Honestly, you should be looking to upgrade your motherboard. If you compare your score with others running a 7950X you are still 15 - 60 secs slower than others with the same CPU. The A620 chipset does not allow for PBO, which is hurting your very expensive CPU. It seems a weird choice to go for the top spec CPU and match it with the lowest spec motherboard, slow RAM, and a budget GPU. Is this primarily for FM judging by those specs? Edited June 2 by Abaddon879 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abaddon879 Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 I got bored so I knocked together some bar charts to show the CPU benchmarks. Note: Where multiple tests were run using the same CPU, I used the average. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fc.cadoni Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 It's amazing how M3 in a laptop is very close to i9 13900K. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lizard2771 Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 (edited) Am 2.6.2024 um 14:26 schrieb Abaddon879: Honestly, you should be looking to upgrade your motherboard. If you compare your score with others running a 7950X you are still 15 - 60 secs slower than others with the same CPU. The A620 chipset does not allow for PBO, which is hurting your very expensive CPU. It seems a weird choice to go for the top spec CPU and match it with the lowest spec motherboard, slow RAM, and a budget GPU. Is this primarily for FM judging by those specs? I have assembled the PC from various individual parts that I had left, and yes I use this PC only for the internet and FM. I think the time is still ok for it Edited June 4 by lizard2771 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roykela Posted June 22 Share Posted June 22 Finally. A fresh install of Windows did the trick for me, in order to do the benchmarks. Quite happy with the results. Although i realise now that my CPU might not have been at a steady 5.5GHz turbo speed. Type: Desktop Model: Custom CPU Model: R9 7900X CPU Base Frequency: 4.70 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.5 GHz RAM: 32GB RAM Clockspeed: 5200Mhz GPU: GeForce RTX 3070 Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Benchmark 1 FM24: 00 min 33 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 01 min 13 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 02 min 38 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 09 min 06 Sec 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonnyd Posted June 24 Share Posted June 24 Just finished building this pc. Decent air cooling unit, but nothing crazy. The 7950X3D is a beast! Type: Desktop Model: Custom CPU Model: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU Base Frequency: 4,2ghz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.7ghz RAM: 32GB RAM Clockspeed: 6000Mhz GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 (kept the old GOAT) Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Storage Type: M2 SSD Benchmark 1 FM24: 31 sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 01 min 01 sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 02 min 29 sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 07 min 05 sec 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolyon Chen Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 On 02/06/2024 at 16:35, Abaddon879 said: I got bored so I knocked together some bar charts to show the CPU benchmarks. Note: Where multiple tests were run using the same CPU, I used the average. I think it's time for a disclaimer after the recent Intel admission of running all their made CPUs for the last 4 years with way too much voltage. I have a safe raptor lake cpu, but we all know most bios vendors are just all guilty for running them with all these overclocked settings. My 13900k just overclocked to 6.0 all core out of the box. But even for advanced users, Intel has gone over a line, and most people can't tinker their bios to undervolt them instead of running them with 15% less performance in Intel basic settings. I think a certain point has come here, where Intel has misled the people, and I'd just advise the new Zen 5 CPUs (99503D or 7800/79003D next month) first in the OP of @Brother Ben., and put a disclaimer up. The amount of CPUs I had to repair in the last year is idiotic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigpole Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 6 hours ago, Jolyon Chen said: I think it's time for a disclaimer after the recent Intel admission of running all their made CPUs for the last 4 years with way too much voltage. I have a safe raptor lake cpu, but we all know most bios vendors are just all guilty for running them with all these overclocked settings. My 13900k just overclocked to 6.0 all core out of the box. But even for advanced users, Intel has gone over a line, and most people can't tinker their bios to undervolt them instead of running them with 15% less performance in Intel basic settings. I think a certain point has come here, where Intel has misled the people, and I'd just advise the new Zen 5 CPUs (99503D or 7800/79003D next month) first in the OP of @Brother Ben., and put a disclaimer up. The amount of CPUs I had to repair in the last year is idiotic. Especially that FM is very very CPU heavy. If undervolting Intel was easy, like Ryzen, it could be 'fixed', at least temporarily. And 7950x3d problems at launch were fixed, so if you want to mix some gaming performance with multicore usage, it's the best CPU after 7800x3d. But the current pricing is not so good (at least in europe, is around 520-550 euros). And because it's not a popular cpu, there's nothing in used market as well (7950x new is around 500 new and 420-450 used). 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Ben Posted July 27 Author Share Posted July 27 17 hours ago, Jolyon Chen said: I think it's time for a disclaimer after the recent Intel admission of running all their made CPUs for the last 4 years with way too much voltage. I have a safe raptor lake cpu, but we all know most bios vendors are just all guilty for running them with all these overclocked settings. My 13900k just overclocked to 6.0 all core out of the box. But even for advanced users, Intel has gone over a line, and most people can't tinker their bios to undervolt them instead of running them with 15% less performance in Intel basic settings. I think a certain point has come here, where Intel has misled the people, and I'd just advise the new Zen 5 CPUs (99503D or 7800/79003D next month) first in the OP of @Brother Ben., and put a disclaimer up. The amount of CPUs I had to repair in the last year is idiotic. I'm just reading up on this as your post is the first time i've heard about it The last computer I built myself was 12 Gen intel for my kids gaming setups and I use Mac myself so i'm a bit out of the loop. I'll do a little research on it and i'll think of something appropriate to put in the OP. Thanks for bringing it to my attention 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
momo93 Posted July 29 Share Posted July 29 Type: Desktop Model: Custom CPU Model: I9-13900KS CPU Base Frequency: 4.40GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: p core :6.00 GHz / e cores 4.3 ghz RAM: 32GB RAM Clockspeed: DDR5-6000 GPU: RTX 4090 24gb Graphics Level in 3D: very high Storage Type: 2TB Samsung 990 PRO PCIe 4.0 Benchmark 1: 31 Seconds Benchmark 2: 1:04min Benchmark 3: 2:46min Benchmark 4: 8:10min That being said, it is important to note that I have my CPU throttled at PL1 150Watts and PL2 200Watts. Simply because that's one way to combat Intel current instability problem until they get a Bios Update out for it. For those that don´t know the I9 13900KS can draw up to 340Watts constantly at full Power. But that doesnt mean it would perform at a +100% its more like 15% - 25% more performance I would get out of it if I were to open the PL1 and PL2 all the way. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMattB81 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 (edited) Type: Desktop Model: Custom Built PC CPU Ryzen 9 7950X3D CPU Base Frequency: 4.20 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.7 GHz RAM: 32GB RAM Clockspeed: 8000Mhz GPU: 7900 XTX TUF OC Graphics Level in 3D: Very High Benchmark 4 FM24: 6 minutes 40 seconds Screenshots of overlay and time taken attached. 7950X3D CPPC (BIOS option that determines which CCD is prioritised initially) Set to Frequency, as FM24 runs faster with higher clock speed rather than primarily using the Cache CCD on dual X3D parts. 7950X3D tuned with 8000Mhz C34 memory, 2200FCLK, and 360 AIO using liquid metal. Edited August 19 by TheMattB81 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gothenburg83 Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 On 29/07/2024 at 11:04, momo93 said: Type: Desktop Model: Custom CPU Model: I9-13900KS CPU Base Frequency: 4.40GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: p core :6.00 GHz / e cores 4.3 ghz RAM: 32GB RAM Clockspeed: DDR5-6000 GPU: RTX 4090 24gb Graphics Level in 3D: very high Storage Type: 2TB Samsung 990 PRO PCIe 4.0 Benchmark 1: 31 Seconds Benchmark 2: 1:04min Benchmark 3: 2:46min Benchmark 4: 8:10min That being said, it is important to note that I have my CPU throttled at PL1 150Watts and PL2 200Watts. Simply because that's one way to combat Intel current instability problem until they get a Bios Update out for it. For those that don´t know the I9 13900KS can draw up to 340Watts constantly at full Power. But that doesnt mean it would perform at a +100% its more like 15% - 25% more performance I would get out of it if I were to open the PL1 and PL2 all the way. I have a similar set up to you (14900k instead of 13900ks) and am now unable to run Benchmark 4. Does anyone have any thoughts on what I can amend in settings to get that to run? Of course, may not be a CPU issue but it's a bit coincidental! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMattB81 Posted August 26 Share Posted August 26 I've just a 9950X so will rerun this shortly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhaffy Posted August 31 Share Posted August 31 I am planning on buying a new PC next year as my current 7 year old Dino PC running Windows 10 is not supported by Windows 11 and was keen to know how my current experience compares to newer processors etc. My Dino PC specs and results for FM24 benchmark tests are as follows: OS: Windows 10 Home 22 H2 Type: Desktop Model: Customised Dino PC CPU: Intel CPU Model: i7 7700 CPU Base Frequency: 3.6GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 4.2GHz Cores: 4 Threads: 8 Launch Date: Q1'17 Ram: 16GB (2 x Crucial 8GB DDR4 2133MHz) Ram Clockspeed: DDR4 2133MHz GPU: Asus GeForce GTX 1050 Expedition OC 2GB GDDR5 Graphics Level in 3D: High Benchmark 1 FM24: 01:09 (1 minute 9 seconds) Benchmark 2 FM24: 04:03 (4 minutes 3 seconds) Benchmark 3 FM24: 06:00 (6 minutes 0 seconds) Benchmark 4 FM24: 38:35 (38 minutes 35 seconds) Looking forward to seeing FM25 Benchmarks before deciding on my new PC in 2025. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redshift Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 Bit late to the party but I got a new Lenovo Legion Go Handheld and wanted to test it. I upgraded the M.2 drive from the default 512Gb 2242 to a Corsair 2Tb M.2 drive so results may vary from a completely fresh retail model, (Bandwidth = 6000MB/s read and 1200MB/s write on the upgraded drive). Type: Handheld Model: Lenovo Legion Go CPU Model: AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (8 cores / 16 threads) CPU Base Frequency: 3.3 GHz CPU Turbo Frequency: 5.1 GHz RAM: 16GB RAM Clockspeed: LPDDR5x-7500 RAM GPU: AMD Radeon Graphics APU (Built into CPU) Graphics Level in 3D: High (Didn't try anything else) Plugged into power and set to performance mode: Benchmark 1 FM24: 00 min 51 Sec Benchmark 2 FM24: 02 min 00 Sec Benchmark 3 FM24: 04 min 51 Sec Benchmark 4 FM24: 23 min 05 Sec The fact that this can keep up with an AMD R7 5700x in benchmark 2 is kind of mental 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.4e0cd8f2fcaf31d47c2e1fbbcf556649.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now