Strategy/Duties

[theopert]

Is it feasible to use attack strategy (control/attack/overload) with 5 defend duties, 2 support duties, 3 attack duties?

Is it feasible to use defend strategy (contain/defend/counter) with 3 defend duties, 2 support duties, 5 attack duties?

Edited August 18 by theopert

[Cloud9]

5 hours ago, theopert said:

Is it feasible to use attack strategy (control/attack/overload) with 5 defend duties, 2 support duties, 3 attack duties?

Is it feasible to use defend strategy (contain/defend/counter) with 3 attack duties, 2 support duties, 5 attack duties?

This is not a great way to approach or understand how your tactic will play out imo. 

I would read through some of these threads instead:

[jcafcwbb]

I believe I would do this:

Attack with 5 defend duties. A 3-5-2: CB - Def, CB - Def, CB- Def / WB-Att,  DM - Def, DM - Def, WB - Att / AP - Att / CF - Sup, CF - Sup with a Positive or Attacking Mentality.

Defend with 5 Attack roles. The same really but with a Cautious Mentality.  CB - Def, Li - Sup, CB - Def / WB - Att, DM - Def, SV - Att. WB - Att / AP - Su / PF - Att, PF - Att.