ERILAR Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 I am playing Chelsea in a 41221 formation with role theory ment system. Two months after new year I've being start to struggle, especially against weaker teams at the bottom of the table. I want to produce more CCC and think my lonely striker could need some support. Therefore I am thinking of moving the DMC up to an AMC. My question for you is how would you set up an Role Theory system for an 4231 formation with an attacking style of play. My 41221 I am playing like this: ......S...... A..........A ....S..A.... ......D...... A..D..D..A D=Defence S=Support A=Attack Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinGoodey Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 My thoughts would be that the MC that is currently a support role, would become a defensive role, the MC that is currently attack becomes support, and the new AMC becomes the 5th attack role along with the fullbacks and wingers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ERILAR Posted January 13, 2009 Author Share Posted January 13, 2009 Do you think the AMC would still be in good positions when the team are building up or breaking. He wouldn't be getting to offensive and not a part of my build ups? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.