Jump to content

Dusan Stamenkovic

FM Head Researchers
  • Posts

    309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

69 "Houston, we have a problem"

5 Followers

Retained

  • Member Title
    Slovenian and Montenegrin Head Researcher

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    Radnički

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    Radnički

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The youth structures do not necessarily mirror the top tier - Serbia is just one example of that. If you take a look at the table over here: https://fss.rs/takmicenje/omladinska-liga-srbije-23-24/ You will see that in 2023/34 not all SuperLiga teams had their U19 team in Omladinska liga, and there were some U19 associated with levels below SuperLiga, such as Grafičar (tier 2) and Brodarac (tier 3). Your U19 would need to secure promotion independently of your A-team. Marko might provide more details on how it is coded, but I think that in any case you cannot expect to have your U19 in the U19 top tier when the A team gets to SuperLiga, in real life or in the game.
  2. That is absolutely correct. This has been fixed. Thanks!
  3. On page 2 Zachary Whyte said it was fixed in early December.
  4. Thank you for reporting this. It is logged and will be fixed. However, there is no need for such a tone.
  5. Thanks. Yes, it makes sense to redo that bit. I will add it as a bug.
  6. The rounds are coded in accordance with the official NZS schedule: https://www.nzs.si/Doc/Info/2023/07-23_Koledar NZS tekmovanj za tekmovalno leto 20232024 (1).pdf
  7. In FM, the round of 16 is called Second Round. It should be happen on 6 March... Maybe we could rename it? The round before it should be on 25/11 (It contains more than 16 clubs and it is called First Round in FM). The round of 8 is called Quarter finals, and it should be on 3 April. To make it clearer - the Cup itself does not start as early as in real life as the represented clubs are included later. So, I guess that the round names appear puzzling because of this.
  8. Club coefficients are not set within country-based databases, so this is not a Serbian data issue - Marko is not responsible for setting these. I hope this issue can be moved to a topic where someone will be able to do something to fix it.
  9. Good. If he stays in Slovenia after the winter break, we can add him. Please provide details on his injury, so that we can set that up as well. Thanks.
  10. Hi, Thank you so much for reporting this. Given that we had experienced very many players from Slovenian who quit quite early, we decided not to add everyone. However, you are right that Horvat is worth adding - on the other hand, he has not made a single appearance this season. Could he be injured? Cheers.
  11. When it comes to Olimpija, I am afraid that you are wrong. In the database, the short name of the club is not Olimpija Lublana. It is simply Olimpija. You are very likely using an external data add-on which changes it to the wrong name. Try loading the game without any external fixes. As for Interblock, we can rename it to IB 1975 in a future update, but this is not a high priority issue at this point, as they are below level 3. Thanks,
  12. Thank you for noticing this - I was not at all aware that we were allowed to add histories for youth structures, as these teams have no separate db entries to select from, they are part of the main club. However, if this is allowed, I can add this in the next possible update. This thread has a duplicate entry, the other one should be deleted. Cheers.
  13. I am unable to live-track the progress of bugs related to Serbian leagues, so I do not know. I am no longer involved in the coding process when it comes to Serbia. However, I hope that everything that can be fixed will be fixed soon.
×
×
  • Create New...