jurix
-
Posts
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by jurix
-
-
8 minutes ago, Daveincid said:11 minutes ago, jurix said:17 minutes ago, Daveincid said:
II thought you were referring to be successful with one club and do the best you can to improve the whole nation that way.
You are right, doing this with alm clubs would be insane. If your goal is to reach unrealistic output like dominating the world with Romania (National Team and League) in a realistic timeframe you are playing the wrong game I'm sorry.
Unrealistic outcomes such as Wrexham winning the Prem? Or Malmö winning the ECL? Or a manager winning all 5 CLs?
Dude you're the one playing the wrong game if you think there are only realistic outcomes in FM.
it's much easier to win the CL with Wrexham as they are playing in a Nation where money is almost unlimited once they are playing in the Premier League. Doing this with a team from Belarus, Albania or just outside of the top 10-Nations is much more challenging.
I never said there are only realistic outcomes in FM. Don't put words in my mouth which I haven't said, thanks
Not putting anything in your mouth, you wrote it yourself. Wrexham winning ECL is about as unrealistic as Steaua winning it or Romania winning two World cups in a row in any given timeframe. It's just not going to happen in real life.
This game is all about making unrealistic things happen in the game-frame while using a realistic base as a start.
0 -
Just now, Daveincid said:
II thought you were referring to be successful with one club and do the best you can to improve the whole nation that way.
You are right, doing this with alm clubs would be insane. If your goal is to reach unrealistic output like dominating the world with Romania (National Team and League) in a realistic timeframe you are playing the wrong game I'm sorry.
Unrealistic outcomes such as Wrexham winning the Prem? Or Malmö winning the ECL? Or a manager winning all 5 CLs?
Dude you're the one playing the wrong game if you think there are only realistic outcomes in FM.
0 -
13 minutes ago, Daveincid said:
1. Invest in your facilities
2. Try to sign some good older players with high reputation and good personality (high reputation helps to grow club reputation slightly / good personality as a mentor and overall squad personality)
3. Try to lower the average age of your club (can influence the value "youth importance" which is also an important hidden value)
3. Improve your staff as good as possible
4. Win games
5. Win games
6. See point 5
So play 10 seasons with a club to get them to a formidable state development-wise.
Resign and take over another side.
Rinse and repeat for 100 seasons to get a couple of clubs to the desired level. Gotcha.
That's exactly what we're arguing against. It's absolute insanity what you're proposing.
1 -
44 minutes ago, Daveincid said:
I've tested what impact facilities-adjustments have when it comes down to newgens-quality. There have been no other changes beside the San Marino-league-file and the facilities-adjustments. Everything is attached so you can take a look if you want
In your opinion what would be the best approach for building a nation save step by step, perfect scenario, for a guy managing in lets say Romania right now?
0 -
21 hours ago, Daveincid said:
Someone seems to have missed my test in this thread
Can you explain what did you test? I saw it but it's not clear what changes you made and how you ran it.
My guess is you changed youth and training facilities of all of the san marinese clubs and simulted without managing anything. Is that correct?
0 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, fc.cadoni said:It's not 50 years, but 28 years actually. And people which gonna start a "build nation" type of save; does not play it for 5 years or 10 years; and does not focus only in national team.
As for amateur club to win CL within a decade is unrealistic as well, but having San Marino in #1 and produce the next Messi is unrealistic as well.
We really have to stop talking about FM needing to be ultra realistic. Last time a team out of top 5 leagues won UCL was Porto in 03/04 and before that AJax in 94/95. While I'm pretty sure everyone contributing to this topic has done it in FM in the first 5-10 years with a club playing outside of top 5 leagues.
So either they should make it more realistic and harder to play, meaning every non-hardcore player stops playing (not happening), or we stop using realism as the one and only thing they should strive for in a game.
19 -
32 minutes ago, 1nter said:
When should we expect argus 352?
Double up on Argus tactics request as I love your 3 ATBs this year. 3421 is my favorite, but 352 and 343 updates would also be cool.
Btw, how do you combat the insane fatigue (especially on wingbacks) in the lower leagues? Rotating the team as much as possible?
0 -
Hey Knap, was wondering what 433 tactics (451, 4231, etc.) have the highest possession rate? Want to start a possession hog type save with preferably 4231 system.
Is the man city tactic still the best one at keeping possession?
0
Is dynamic youth ratings for nations working how it should be?
in Football Manager General Discussion
Posted
I specifically mentioned Romania, don't know where you read San Marino. You can make the same argument for Poland, Ukraine, Russia, India or whatever big country.
And guess what man, different people find different things challenging. Or interesting.
When we get promised "HUGE impact cause it's dynamic", we're kind off pissed when in reality is "no impact, can't influence it cause it's dynamic based on only static factors we can't actually impact" type of deal.
FM is a game. In my opinion develop a nation challenges should be possible. We were teased they would be. They aren't.