Jump to content

marko82

Members+
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by marko82

  1. I have a very simple and successful counterattacking 4-4-2 that works even with Roma squad which is not 100 % suited to it (lack of a real targetman, i have to play Dybala as a poacher, lack of true wingers and Spinazzola plays as a fullback which is kind of a waste considering his technical abilities).
    It's so good and incisive that i'm in awe, probably the best tactic i've ever made in FM :D
    I'll probably make a thread about it, but here it is for now.
    Fullbacks have PI ''cross more often'' and wide midfielders have ''dribble more'' (because you need at least one ball carrier but not too many in counterattacking tactics).
      

    Screenshot_2.png

    Screenshot_3.png

  2. For me, the first ''flaws'' are wingbacks on attack, and both wingers are in AM strata.
    Try to experiment with wingbacks on support and wingers in the same roles but in lower strata, i know it technically makes it 4-4-1-1 but i think you will achieve defensive balance and invite opponents to fall into your counterattacking trap, and  in attack it will look like 4-2-3-1 that you are trying to achieve.

  3. I think the main problem is balance, 2 IW on attack, ball winning midfielder although on def role is not the most disciplined player in sense of positioning, he is more a ''ball chaser'' so to speak, and you have a WB-attack as well on that side.
    I would first try WB-S and CM-D to see if that makes more balance, the other ''flaw'' for me is 2 NCB who will mostly lump the ball just to clear it away, and that in comibination with more direct passing, higher tempo and pass into space probably breaks a lot of your attacks before they even started, so i would at least change them on standard CD-D roles.

  4. i'm currently using this type of 4--4--2 with Southend, it's different than a preseta but uses principles of wing play.
    It's doing fine, 7 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss, it's
    It's a little one dimensional and it's probably not going to do well in bigger rank unless you have world class players who can do something on their own when we face stubborn defenses.
     

    Screenshot_2.png

  5. Hello, i think you could solve two problems with this tactic,
    1.The left hand side puts too much defensive pressure on FBsup (two attacking roles in front of him), and probably causing disconnected passing on that side.
    I would i try putting IF-sup or even better IW on support because he is very good with runners such as CM-at.
    If you don't have the player for the role, try W-sup.

    2. Advanced forward as lonely striker could work sometimes, but he needs good support, so try to change the first thing i've written, and if it still doesn't work, my second step would be change to a support role striker, or DLF att if you insist on having attacking role. You need a striker who will participate more in buildup and secondly make space for wingers and CM-at
    I hope this helps :D

  6. 2 hours ago, fraudiola said:

    442 was my most successful tactic in FM21 but had loads of trouble with it in FM22 due strikers (and wide players) being a bit wonky in FM22, dribbling wide, and PF/AF dropping much deeper to connect in build up plays due to people playing AFs in a single striker formation complaining about them being too isolated at times whereas in a 442 you'd want your attack duty striker to be pinning back the D line and looking to make runs behind constantly instead of trying to link up plays, that's the TM/DLF's job. 

    so that's probably one of the reasons...

    That is probably one of the reasons, cause i noticed as well that all of the strikers are dropping down much more in fm 22.
    So when i use this tactic in FM 22 it means we still have a great interplay as in FM 21, passing is fluid, but when we reach the final third, there is no one to pass the ball to and about 90 percent of attacks finish outside of the box, central and wide midfielders passing it endlessly until someone shoots from distance out of pure frustration :D
    I will maybe try putting the DLF in attacking role, but i'm afraid of losing defensive stability because with two strikers on attacking roles equal losing the 4-4-1-1 defensive shape.
    Maybe the solution is to put both strikers on man marking the midfielders, i need to try it :D

  7. @wilcoadamsthank you! :D i'm not sure how you even discovered this post after so long :D i tried this with AS Roma again in FM 22 and it wasn't going so well as in FM 21, the interplay between players is still great, but it's not as efficient (much less goalscoring chances etc.)
    Maybe it's simplicity isn't enough anymore for bigger clubs in the new iteration of the game, so that's why you're having success in lower leagues.
    Although, that was before final updates, so maybe match engine updates brought it back to life.
    I will try it again and post my results :D
    If you happen to try it with some bigger club, please report your findings :D

     

  8. Man mark a specific postion is really useful in Mourinho type tactics.
    I mostly put my forward to mark their deeper midfielder, this way you do 2 things:
    1.your forward sometimes steals the ball and opens a counterattacking opportunity
    2.you slow down opponents transition so your defenders get into their positions on time and you are really tough to break
    If it's a bigger team who adapts and starts transitioning through wingbacks, i man mark them with my AML/AMR.
    I'm not a tactical mastermind by any means, just watched a lot of Mourinhos games and i used this (in my opinion) very underrated article by @Experienced Defender:

     

  9. Great article as always crusaderstar! :D I tried a tactic with similar principles and similar roles with my beloved Roma in FM 21, and we won 4:0 :D 
    12 vs 7 shots against them, all of our shots were at least half chances, and Juve's opportunities were mostly long shots from more than 30 meters.
    Very clinical and at times beautiful football.
    It's strange for possesion/attacking oriented manager as i am to watch a game where we don't dominate with 20+ shots and 60% + possession :D

    The only concern is how we're going to play against smaller teams, guess i'll sometimes need to up the defensive line a notch if we can't score a goal?
    i will report my findings, 'till then here is my iteration of Special Football:
     

    Screenshot_2.png

  10. I've been trying to (kind of) copy Fonseca's Roma, i couldn't get it to work with 3-4-2-1, so i did a 5-2-3(WB) like this



     

    Screenshot_1.png

    Instructions are very similar to yours(no tight marking), BPD's have stay wider, sometimes it' struggles to break down very defensive teams (especially the ones which play with 3 at the back and a DM) but overall plays very nice football

  11. 10 hours ago, zyfon5 said:

    Play with two full backs instead of wingbacks. Two pressing forward on support duty. For midfielders I think one box to box + one CM(s) should be a good set up. For the two wide midfielder you want to play two natural midfielder there instead of traditional wingers. TI toned down a bit so that it is less aggressive. Lower LOE will be needed.

    Thank you! I was thinking about DLP-su and CM-su in the middle, Standard defensive line and lower LOE and without counterpress for Simeone style.

  12. On 04/12/2020 at 11:06, zyfon5 said:

    Overall very balanced tactic and not too aggressive. The TI and player roles also make sense what type of football you are trying to achieve here. You can also make a few tweaks and play defensive similar to how Simeone likes to set up. It is a good tactic and your run of good results is well justified. Possibly a few tweaks is needed when teams start to play more defensive against you.

    Thank you :D  Could you tell me what you think Simeone's setup would look like?

  13. 12 minutes ago, neptune'sblue said:

    I tried the dude tactic at Fiorentina. I had tremendous results but unfortunately my save file was corrupted. I decided to try it in my other career (Fenerbahce). Really good. Despite seeing a red card, the team did not lose to A. Madrid on the road. We act very fluently and as a team. Watching the matches is very enjoyable.

    And Results.

    20201206003849_1.thumb.jpg.19516bb5c361f5dc099445df9a77b27b.jpg

    Oh man, great results! glad you're enjoying it :D
    Is this on FM 21 or FM 20?
    Post feedback anytime you want, and if you notice things that could can be improved etc.

    I will post some more feedback and progress in couple of days, didn't have much time to play these days

  14. Just now, neptune'sblue said:

    Thanks for your advice. I was trying the 442 tactic but could not make a system. I guess it is necessary to think simple(like u said ) And yes, I plan to play a season with Fiorentina with this tactic. If you want, I can write what happened in fiorentina save.

    Of course, please do :thup:
    i'm curious to see how it unfolds with Callejon and Ribery on WM-s, and Fiorentina is Roma's sister club, Davide Astori and great Batigol connect us! 

  15. 2 hours ago, RTHerringbone said:

    I play extraordinarily similarly with Argentinos Juniors at the moment, with the main difference being that the left sided "striker" is actually in the AMCL position as an AMC on Support.

    My team instructions are only slightly different and I love the play it creates because it doesn't over commit people forward but does give plenty of support when attacks unfold. Personally I much prefer having only one option in front of the ball and allowing play to build up from behind with quick triangles of possession or rapid counter attacks.

    Thank you for dropping by RTHerringbone! I remember your blog and articles that helped me learn a lot about the game, especially the one from FM 16 about Aston Villa :applause:
    Very clever thinking with AM-su, and filling all the strata probably has benefits that you cover the whole pitch and there are no weaknesses with different opponents formations.
    Does your AM-su have ''get further forward'' or any other PI? What's the other strikers role?
    I would like to try it with Roma, maybe use it as another option. 

     

  16. 39 minutes ago, neptune'sblue said:

    I read your article. You have created a very good tactic by knowing what you want in simple and very plain language. And I'm curious about the developments. I have only one question. Are there any player attributes (workrate etc.) or PPM that need attention in the WM role? I would be very happy if you answer.

    Thank you neptune's blue :D 
    For the WM's good PPM is ''cuts inside from the wings'' and it's good to have a player that can pass at least a little bit because they also contribute to playmaking (lets say minimum of 12 for passing and vision is needed).
    But if you have a WM on one side that is better in passing like Mkhitaryan, and one that is more attacking inside forward type of player like Pedro, its still ok, especially if they are hardworking like them.

    But you know what is really beautiful in 4-4-2, you can also play a wingback on that position, if he has solid technique he can totally play :D Bruno Peres who is under average wingback played couple of times on right WM and had really good games.
    Spinazzola can play it also really good.
    I see you probably manage Fiorentina, so Callejon, Ribery, Bonaventura, Kouame should be killers on that position :D
    Pol Lirola could play it as well, maybe Biraghi because of good crossing, but then put attacker with good heading and jumping on the same side, like Vlahović :D 

  17. Hey guys, thank you for the comments! :D 
    As Sting said when they couldn't finish some songs they recorded in a studio because they complicated the arrangements: ''Gentlemen, simplicity, not stupidity'' :D

    Sometimes when it goes really bad in football (similar to life), it's just you complicating and overthinking things :D

    In my last couple of games I went more attacking, with two MC-su and DLF on attack and we are still making a lot of chances and scoring, while being great defensively.
    We've had 3 CCC's and been much better against Juventus, but the game finished 1:1, a huge mistake by Karsdorp who gifted the ball to Cristiano Ronaldo in 92.minute :seagull: 
    But now i don't get frustrated as i used to, because i know this sometimes happen in real life, it's not my tactics fault, and Karsdorp is not a great player, I'm waiting on Florenzi to come back from a loan to PSG :D
    I'll keep you posted about my save as I'm intending to make Roma a European giant with our recognizable simplistic style and  a lot of youth development.
    We are not a team that can buy expensive players, so I'm gonna scout a lot and let our kids play, similar to Ajax :onmehead:

  18. Hello guys, I've been playing FM for 20 years and as much as i love the game in last couple of iterations I've been suffering immensely.
    With introduction of massive effect of the roles and constant need for tinkering with tactics, FM became really frustrating for me so i always gave up after endless trying of different stuff. 

    I've read a lot of articles by great masters of this game like @Cleon, @Rashidi, @Ozil, @Experienced Defender, and it became my obsession to read every night before sleep about roles, width, defensive lines and I've gone for the approach of not caring for the results, just trying to make a tactic that's eye pleasing so i can at least enjoy watching games until I get sacked :D 
    But on FM 19 and 20, i couldn't even do that, or if i did it lasted a couple of games until some bogey tactic (at least for me because i didn't know how to counter it) came around and there was no chances or after 20+ shots on target and 2-3 clear cut chances they scored on the counter and won 0:1. 

    Couple of weeks ago I've taken a different approach.
    I made a simple tactic with basic formation that every player on any level of competition can understand, that presses pretty hard, doesn't have a lot of TI's but the main thing is that you can change it slightly according to the opponent without overthinking it.  
    The perfect formation for this was of course 4-4-2, that every kid that starts playing football learns very quickly.
    My version is slightly more modern than the plain old ''two wingers running and crossing the ball to the big guy so he can put it down for the fast guy'' because that kind of football on the higher levels is ancient history and you easily get stopped by almost any team :D

    Maybe someone has already done it and i missed it on the forums, maybe I've just accidentally found a ''hole'' in ME, but the roles and TI's are pretty logical and it doesn't look as I am exploiting the ME because even if i wanted to, i wouldn't know how :lol:
    I'm not saying I invented the wheel, it just helped me enjoy this game again, so maybe it can help you think differently when making your own tactic.

    So, without further ado, I present you the tactic for the lazy manager that plays nice simple football and wins a lot:

    Screenshot_1.thumb.png.dc92ca428321bd39a370bb8fb5451877.png

    The Wide Midfielders have PI of ''sit narrower'', and both of them have a trait ''cuts inside''.
    Pellegrini on the CM-su  has a PI ''take more risk'' because i wanted to emphasize his really good passing, but you can use it without it. 
    I use roles for strikers that have PI ''move to channels'' to further stretch the defenses, but I've noticed that Advanced Forward tends to be isolated against different teams, so i opted for this combo.
    The beauty of 4-4-2 is that you can use any role that suits your strikers, just make sure that you have one support and one attacking role and both with ''move to channels'' either by putting it manually or them being already encoded for the role.

    Basically what this tactic does is:
    Wide midfielders cut inside or go near the wingbacks to supply them and come to the positions almost in the AM strata leaving space for wingbacks to cross or pass,
    CM-su supplies all of them them with through balls, and DM-su acts like a holder in defense, and joins CM-su in possession phase.
    Strikers do their thing because they have a lot of options as WBs and WMs overwhelm the midfielders and fullbacks.
    You can sometimes play DM-su as second CM-su, depends on the opponents formation, but this is the ''safer'' option.
    What i see is really nice pressing, lot of passing options, very good defense, shots and chances from 6-7 players in the team. 
    Opponents very rarely catch you on the counter because of the high line, but they generally don't have a lot of opportunities.
    You can go more defensive by putting wingbacks to fullbacks, strikers to pressing forwards on support etc.
    Lots of options that don't kill the balance instantly when you choose the ''wrong'' role.

    These are the results since I've started using this approach, the draws are a side effect of a hectic schedule and heavily rotating not so deep Roma squad:

    Screenshot_2.png.594f46dab9eff748615a9f60f21e9b00.png

    I'm really enjoying my save now, not just because of winning, but even in this draws we played really well, just missing chances.
    Now I know for sure when a team is better than mine, rather than me not doing a tactical puzzle well. 
    So tell me is it a ''fluke'' or the solution has been all these years under my nose and i just overcomplicated things :lol:
    I'm still on FM 20, so if someone tries it on new ME, please leave feedback.

×
×
  • Create New...