Jump to content

Kane10

Members+
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Issue Comments posted by Kane10

  1. I don't believe in the validity of that news but I can't prove otherwise. The terms of the contract seem to be unofficial and all the numbers are speculation. There is talk in the press that he could be sold for over 20M and most commentators are commenting as if they are unaware of this clause. It seems healthier to keep the clause in the game. 

    Also Fenerbahce might have buy back clause for Isak Vural.

    https://www.transfermarkt.com.tr/isak-vural-transferi-resmen-acıklandı-sozleşmedeki-geri-satın-alma-maddesi/view/news/420359

    https://www.sondakika.com/spor/haber-fenerbahce-nin-buyuk-beklentilerle-transfer-ettigi-15749365/

  2. I really like what you are trying to with attributes and it will look and feel a lot better when it's consistent among at least all turkish league.

    I personally always like to put all attributes of the squad into an excel and like to sort from highest to lowest to re-check my editings before i start my career with the clubs I watch.(Fenerbahçe-Tottenham) This can be done with pre-game editor as well but excel provides more options to analyz. This way it is really easy to see some inconsistencies. When I check current Fenerbahçe, I saw İrfan's 12 passing is being in a spot i very disagree. There are more examples but I am not here to highlight all of them.

    Most of your customers in Turkey are supporters of three big clubs and I think these three clubs require more attention. Comparing all 3 squads in the way I mentioned might help you as a researcher. Maybe you are already doing this. But there are many things I can not understand. Kerem Aktürkoğlu is rated as 16 vision, I have seen other 15s in Turkish League and then I see Tadic as 15 vision. My personal opinion, that feels very wrong. And I think current and previous years stasts of assists, key passes, xAG, xA, passe/crosser into penalty area would show this. And tadic was playing higher level football in champions league and proved himselft there in multiple seasons.

    I have no access turkish league advanced stats but Tadic yast year in Eredivisie:

    163 Key passes (%63 more than 2nd place player.)

    4.95 Key passes per game. Closest is Gakpo with 4.72 but only  with 1/3 play time. With similar play times are considered to Tadic closest stats belongs Vermaan at 3.62 (rated 15 vision last year). Orkun Kökçü follows with 2.97. 

    I think Tadic deserves better vision. At least 16. Maybe more. 

     

  3. My personal opinion is that in many leagues the weaknesses of many players are rated between 10-12. It's like a default rating. I like the fact that the weaknesses of the high profile players of the big teams in Turkey are revealed more. But since this kind of rating is not applied in the Turkish league wide and the game in general, these low ratings stand out a lot. 
    Nelson's header may be a 10, but I'm sure a lot of stopper's headers at much worse levels are rated much higher. 
    What interests me about Fenerbahce is that Osterwolde's dribbling (8) is weaker than almost all defenders. I find Osterwolde's dribbling rating wrong, but in this case, I think players like Samet and Serdar Aziz should definitely be rated even lower. If İrfan Can Kahveci has 12 passing I don't don't know how you should rate passing league-wide. There should a lot of minus 10.

  4. My personal opinion is that Szymanski's technical qualities, even in his Legia days, deserved better. The player has passing ability. He is a very good passer, especially with his left foot. I think he has problems with his right foot. I think his weak right foot limits his dribbling and passing ability. Since he came to Fenerbahce he has scored a lot of goals for a player who plays 8-10. And in these goals I think he has shown his finishing, distance shooting and technical qualities. My personal opinion:
    Finishing 12-14
    First touch 13-15
    Pass 14-15
    Technique 15
    Long shots 15-16
    I think his mental attributes are ideal. His concentration has improved since the first day he came to Fenere. I think he deserves 1-2 points of improvement. His game vision is definitely better than 11.
    As for the physical characteristics and player characteristics, I agree 100% and I think they are very well observed.
    After seeing his form and success in the last months, this profile is disappointing.

  5. Honestly I think turkish community would never be satisfied with grading of players. However your responses on X are very irritating. 

    It's unfair to the people who bought the game that inconsistencies/faults in player profiles from other leagues (researchers) are not touched to make them stand out. (to who anyways?)

     

×
×
  • Create New...