Jump to content

MagicHat

Members+
  • Posts

    213
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

55 "Houston, we have a problem"

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    Leeds United

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    Leeds United

Recent Profile Visitors

1,066 profile views
  1. From what i've read it's all in one together, in one ecosystem. in FM it is optional though, you can turn off any league you want and turn of news/competitions if you want to streamline the game. So everyone should be able to play as they wish
  2. You're really bad at this aren't you? I watch women's football, i watched Leeds vs Durham the other week and there were some great goals in it. I spent a few minutes typing a comment out of a 24 hour day, for me it's minimal effort. You are clearly triggered because you've read an opinion you disagree with... instead of considering the logic applied you keep speculating that my views are misogynist, To clarify i watch Leeds women play almost weekly, i think Women's football should be added eventually. Will i play it over men's football? No, because i'm more interested in the plethora of saves i can do in the men's games. Adding the women's game in this version was a bad idea that logically led to an increase in workload. The game is delayed and the reaction over the past month or so has been highly negative. The "why do you care" argument is another terrible argument. I do care about football manager, i've played football manager for decades and other football manager games before that. If i don't like the women's version in this year i'll just turn all the leagues off and the news for the competitions. Simple. I answered the thread question in a friendly and logical manner. I honestly don't know what your problem is.
  3. Lol true but i like to play the odd friendly or play my squad players in u21 games to keep their fitness up.
  4. The seat belt thing is a fallacy of bad analogy. "This kind of thought process" is a fact based opinion that answers the question in the title thread. If you can present me any facts that women's football is more popular than men's or women's sports in games is more popular than women's sports in general i will change my opinion. As an objective onlooker i'm always willing to change my opinion but not if it's based on subjective feelings or tastes of an individual. If somethings popular it will become popular naturally. When men's football became popular it wasn't socially engineered, it was just a natural occurrence. That's how supply and demand works. "certain types of people" again..., really not necessary,,, when you start throwing insults around because someone disagrees with you you're going into ad hominem territory. Bad arguments and fallacious reasoning are not the way to change people's opinions. BTW... i actually watch Leeds women's on youtube because they stream the games on the Leeds official channel... so there's that...
  5. Women's football is less popular than men's football and women's football in games is even less popular than women's football. I don't think there's any evidence that would prove both of those statements untrue...
  6. Women's football is less popular than men's football and women's football in games is even less popular than women's football. I don't think there's any evidence that would prove both of those statements untrue...
  7. Sorry but i only deal with facts and logic. Fact 1. Womens football is significantly less popular than mens football. Womens football in games is even less popular. Fact 2. Would adding another sex category of teams in FM have increased the workload of SI... 100% it will have. This really isn't necessary. Ad Hominem is ineffective against reason.
  8. Honestly, no... there's a 100 save ideas i would pursue before i played the women's leagues. TBH it's a huge waste of time for SI because the amount of people who play the game for that feature will not be worth the workload needed to implement it... being realistic here... Just to remind you all... the game was delayed
  9. So i'm in 2027 and noticed there's a month gap between fixtures... in 2026 there was a 21 day gap too, usually it's just 2 weeks for the international break... i can't find any reason why it's such a gap is this something to do with planned changes IRL... or is it some kind of fixture problem that's happening in my game specifically? Anyone know why or had similar things happen? Of course it's a bit of a problem because i'd rather just have a 2 week gap and have less fixture congestion down the line...
  10. When the first guy complains who is a highly influential member, you have to convince him he's influential and well thought of, if you convince him not to get a new contract it will then unlock a new dialogue box the next time someone else asks saying something like "X came with a similar situation and they didn't get a new contract" then they will say "ok X is a better person than me but i get your point. If you get it right it will cause an infinite chain where your players can be convinced not to sign a new contract. The only way i've seen this chain be broken is if your players start to lose faith in you/your team performances are so bad that they become unhappy. It's quite difficult to get this right but when you do it stops a lot of contract issues. If you give contracts out too much then other players start asking for them too. Then the squad can turn against you and they stick up for their teammates.
  11. Just a funny one really. I'm Leeds and was invited to play Bournemouth for Cook's testimonial. Here's what happened... xD Cook testimonial - Made with Clipchamp.mp4 Nice
  12. I'd go for Solis, those mental attributes will make a huge difference. Commanding of area and aerial reach could be help with solis if your defenders are good in the air. If your defenders aren't good in the air then you might see more headers conceded.
  13. A flat 433, very attacking with attacking wing backs, 2 inside forwards as narrow as possible with movies into channels trait. Then i would suggest your wing backs have gets further whenever possible trait. Putting all of the CM's on support roles should keep the 3 in the middle structured. I play something similar except i have a double pivot and a CAM, so mine ends up a 2-2-1-5 when the wing backs are up high
  14. Yeah but it's quite time consuming, same as the player graph thingy... if i do side by side i can compare in seconds... think of it like a really easy "spot the difference". Where as the screenshot you're posted you're basically going through every attribute reading them out. A side by side snippet comparison would be much more efficient.
×
×
  • Create New...