Gastofm
-
Posts
61 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by Gastofm
-
-
Hi good day. I have a query, do you know if you can add created tactics to the artificial intelligence managers of the game? Or how can I change your tactical methods?
0 -
Hello good day. This pack is very good, it makes the game much more complete!
In the section "A Bit Better Manager Tactics", you could if you want to talk to the "FMtrendgames" to make the managers more realistic and complete in terms of tactics. They perform real managerial tactics in the game, and they do it very well. The truth is that it would be great if they could translate these tactics into the database.
This is the page:
fmtrendgames.com/tactics/fm21-tactics/
Greetings and have a nice day!
0 -
Good Morning. In this topic I come to propose new roles that could be added to the next game in the saga, Football Manager 2021.
Two of the three roles already exist but would only be added in new positions.
And those three roles are: "Raumdeuter" (Position: "AMC"), "Wide Midfielder" (Position: "MCL" and "MCR"), and the new one for the positions "DCR" and "DCL".
Reasons:
-Raumdeuter: He named this role as this season we saw Thomas Müller play in the "AMC" position. As we already know, the role of Thomas Müller is indecipherable, and this season is no exception.
-Wide Midfielder: This role occurred to me in the Champions League match between RB Leipzig vs Atlético Madrid. The German team played a 4-2-3-1, in which Laimer, defended in the central position of the midfield but at the time of attacking it happened to be something like a "Wing Back". También daría mucha dinámica y cambio en una formación. Imagínese, utilizando un mediocentro central que se convierte en un jugador de banda ancha, y un "Wing Back Invertido" jugando en la posición que dejó el mediocampista central.
-*New Rol* DCR an DCL: In the latter case, you know what role I mean. The roles of the right and left central defenders of teams like Atalanta and Sheffield United. Central defenders but who are capable of going on the attack by overlapping or underlapping.
1 -
On 15/08/2020 at 02:49, gam945 said:
The formation in the Tactics section is the defensive shape. Now try to choose players roles and instructions that will lead to the shape being altered into a new one, and you will have a defensive (default) formation as well as an attacking formation. That's how I see it.
Even so, with a 4-2-3-1, the offensive tactic of the named example could not be carried out. Laimer playing "Shuttler" or "Mezzala", does not generate the amplitude that is needed.
0 -
For example, Maurizio Sarri also established a defensive formation. It started from a 4-3-3 or 4-3-1-2 but defensively it was a 4-4-2.
0 -
A particular case to explain my request is yesterday's game between RB Leipzig vs Atlético Madrid.
Julian Nagelsmann proposed a "3-3-3-1" (3-1-5-1 / 2-2-5-1 in attack) in which the "Wingbacks" (Angeliño and Laimer) became wingers who proposed amplitude to the attack, while the "Wingers" closed to generate numerical superiority in the center of the field, as if they were "false Attacking Midfielders". That currently in the FM20 can be done.
Now, the problem lies in this point: RB Leipzig in defense changed to a "4-2-3-1", in which one of his "Wingbacks", Laimer, became a "Midfielder Defensive". Currently in the game, it is not possible to generate a formation without ball position without doing "Mark Specific Player", this section is no longer a zonal defense. In the section "Mark Specific Position" it is not effective, because it doesn't really do the job. I can tell a "Wingback" that I made a "Mark Specific Position" in the midfield position and not do it (even marking the position of an opponent).
2 -
5 minutes ago, TheGoodRebel said:
Sí, eso es todo
THANKS!
0 -
9 minutes ago, TheGoodRebel said:
No como tal ...
Hasta donde yo sé, el creador de la táctica funciona dentro de cierto marco. La configuración de ancho "Estándar" no es solo una configuración. Hay variaciones un poco más anchas y un poco más estrechas del ancho estándar que están determinadas por la mentalidad que seleccione. Entonces, cuanto mayor es la mentalidad, más cerca del umbral antes del ancho se clasifica como ancho. Para jugar "ancho", deberá seleccionar ancho. Pero el ancho estándar con una mentalidad de ataque será más amplio que el ancho estándar de la mentalidad equilibrada o positiva.
Okay.
In other words, the "Standard" varies from mentality. A "balanced" mentality is going to be an average between width and center, and the more offensive it is, the more it opens up, and the more defensive it is, the narrower it is. True?
0 -
27 minutes ago, TheGoodRebel said:
Estándar es algo así como la configuración equilibrada. Por ejemplo, si estás jugando con una mentalidad equilibrada y tienes tu ancho establecido en estándar, este será un medio feliz entre ancho y estrecho. Sin embargo, si cambia su mentalidad a Positiva y mantiene su ancho como Estándar, seguirá siendo un medio entre ancho y estrecho, pero será ligeramente más ancho que el ancho estándar bajo una mentalidad equilibrada, ya que son cambios incrementales. Básicamente, cuanto más ataque ataques, más ancho será tu ancho estándar. Cuanto más defensiva sea tu mentalidad, más estrecho será tu ancho estándar.
Además, si jugaste una mentalidad de ataque o muy atacante, y estableciste tu ancho en estrecho, no sería tan estrecho como lo sería si tu mentalidad se configurara en una mentalidad más defensiva. Lo mismo se aplicaría a establecer su ancho en ancho bajo una mentalidad defensiva, no sería tan ancho como lo sería bajo una mentalidad de ataque.
La misma lógica se aplica a todas las demás configuraciones también.
Which means sometimes its narrow or fairly wide. ?
0 -
This option appears in the "Attacking Width", "Passing directness", "Tempo" and "Defensive width" section.
I really don't understand the meaning of the word in the game.
0 -
3 minutes ago, themadsheep2001 said:
Te entiendo
Si juegas a lo ancho, el extremo naturalmente jugará un poco más, ya que le has pedido a todo el equipo que se separe, entonces puedes pedirle que se mantenga aún más ancho.
Si juegas más estrecho y le pides al extremo que se mantenga más ancho, tu equipo seguirá siendo compacto, pero aún intentará mantenerse más ancho.
En lo que respecta a su ejemplo de Ciudad, sí, puede replicar eso pidiéndole al equipo que juegue estándar o bastante limitado, y luego pidiéndole al jugador ancho que se mantenga más amplio. Tenga en cuenta que cuando lo necesitan, la Ciudad tiene la capacidad de pasar de largo desde el lado del campo al otro para elegir a ese jugador ancho. Por lo tanto, es probable que desee que al menos un jugador con PPM cambie la pelota a otro flanco y / o un juego de pases un poco más largo en sus instrucciones (quien sea que esté desempeñando el papel KDB)
I watched.
I am playing in an "Extremely Wide" attacking width. Bernardo Silva has the specific task of "Sit Narrower", and Joao Cancelo of "Stay Wider" (he is a "Complete Wingback Support"1 -
11 minutes ago, Experienced Defender said:
Realmente no entiendo tu versión de inglés, lo siento. No hay instrucciones que le digan a un jugador que "abra" o "cierre" (excepto el "Cierre", pero ese no tiene nada que ver con el ancho de ataque).
Excuse me, I used the wrong terms.
I mean, for example, an "Winger" tasked with "Stay Wider" on an attack width "Wide", will it open the same as in a "Standard" or "Narrow" width?
0 -
6 minutes ago, Experienced Defender said:
Lo siento, pero no entiendo ¿qué quieres decir con "no planeo cerrar"? ¿Para cerrar a quién?
I mean is that you are telling the player to try to stay open and not to be more closed so as not to waste the width of the field, because if he does not select any, the player will close if he wants.
But there is another doubt. If I ask a player to open or close, how much will he do? I don't think it's the same thing, telling a player in a "Standard" width to open, as opposed to a "narrow" width.
0 -
28 minutes ago, FMunderachiever said:
Creo que si le estás diciendo a un jugador ancho que "se quede ancho", básicamente estás diciendo que no vayas adentro para recibir la pelota. mantente fuera y recíbelo allí.
Si quieres jugar pases cortos pero tienes jugadores anchos, tendrán que entrar un poco para recibir pases, necesitas que los jugadores estén más juntos.
Además, si quieres jugar con un ancho tan extremo, no estoy seguro de tener un tempo bajo es una buena idea. presumiblemente, quieres que la pelota avance y salga rápidamente, porque esa es la salida de ataque. ¿Estás tratando de preparar hombres anchos para correr contra los defensores 1 contra 1?
I'm trying to capture Guardiola's 4-3-3 taking advantage of the entire playing field, with "inverted wingbacks" and "inverted wingers" to create spaces both on the wing and in the center. Here I played a 4-2-3-1 because I didn't have the right players for 4-3-3, so I used a double pivot and instead of two reverse lanes, I put one in that role and a "Complete Wingback "
For example, I gave Bernardo Silva the individual task of trying to close (in a very high width ") to leave the lane for Joao Cancelo.
The interesting thing is that the ends cut inwards, which generates a compact team in the center and in case of loss, "counter-press2
But there are things that I still don't understand, for example, is it the same to tell "Bernardo Silva" to close in an "extremely wide" width instead of "wide", is it going to close more? And of course, I think that based on that Joao Cancelo is going to open based on the collective width, right?
0 -
24 minutes ago, Experienced Defender said:
You should not take instructions (both team and player) literally. They serve to encourage a certain type of behavior whenever possible, but not in the sense of players following them blindly like robots.
Plus, every instruction is directly impacted by the team mentality you play on as well as other instructions (including player roles) that you use within the tactic.
Oh tell me if I understood correctly. Are you saying that this is a way to encourage the individual player to stay with the band (and not plan to close) based on the collective width? And if for example it is narrow, the individual idea would be to tell them "try to close" to meet the collective width?
0 -
I have a lot of doubts about the width in the attack because I don't know if the individual task of a specific player can change the collective width. For example, the attack width is "extremely high" and I frame a specific player as "sit narrower". Does it mean that all but that player will remain opened? And if instead, I individually mark one that "stay wider" is going to leave the field hahaha? I don't understand why those two options exist, if, for example, in the case of setbacks / flaps in the "stay wider" part, it says they will open up to the sideline (ie take advantage of the whole field). What is the point then of putting "extremely broad"?
0 -
Hi. I am reformulating DT's line-ups in the top five leagues in Europe. And I thought about canceling all the preferences of the technicians without a club, so when they arrive at a club they have a certain alignment. The theme is the following, I know that the preferred formations are generated, but the offensive / defensive ones too? And another question regarding the offensive / defensive formations, if they are canceled from before, if new ones are generated, can those DTs use them before the game, or is it only when they have to win or lose it?
0 -
Whenever I attack, my defensive line does not pass the midfield, so that I can shrink the opponent and that they go further back in their field. Nor do I see that my defenses look for short pass supports from the far forward sides.
0 -
Whenever I attack, my defensive line is always behind the midfield line.
0 -
Van Dijk Season 21/22 > 54M PSG
0 -
20 hours ago, FrazT said:
Nadie sabe, cuando la próxima actualización es rel; facilitado en breve podemos tener más idea.
Can a club be sanctioned with the editor? Like Chelsea, who could not sign for a market.
0 -
Okay. According to the database there is no VAR in Champions
1 -
They never charge me var plays in this competition in the game
0 -
15 hours ago, FrazT said:
Esta
Is it in the game?
0
Does anyone know how to create a calendar and specific dates of matches? It is to make the World Cup 2022
in Advanced Rules Editing
Posted
Quiero el fixture real del Mundial 2022 pero no se como hacer el calendario.
Alguien sabe por donde empiezo a crear el calendario?
En esta imagen no me deja hacer nada