Belap
-
Posts
5 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by Belap
-
-
35 minutes ago, PinkSpeedos said:
Thanks for your feedback.
I've tinkered with it again a little bit (before seeing your comment) and beat top of the table Liverpool, 3-1
Went with the following:
SK(D)
WB(S) - BPD(C) - CD(D) - WB(S)
HB(D)
MEZ(A) - BWM(S)
IF(S) - IW(A)
DLF(A)
Shorter passing, play out, low crosses, focus through the middle, lower tempo
Distribute to CBs, hold shape, counter press
Defender narrow, higher line of engagement, more urgent, prevent short GK kicks
DLF seems to hold things up top a little better which takes some of the pressure off the defence. The Mezella scored a hat trick so I was probably missing that attacking threat from midfield (as was mentioned further up).
You've said about defending wider - can I ask why you think that would be a good idea?
Thanks
I do NOT think defending wider is a good idea for you
I just said that your original tactic could easily be countered by defending wider and as such needed a threat in the middle, your mezalla now.
I think your tactic rn seems fine, althougj I would suggest to turn your WB on the side if your MEZ to a FB against quick sides, as a MEZ and a WB might leave you exposed om the break
0 -
To me, the real question would be why you chose overlap with 2 inverted minded wingers. Who is there to overlap? I'd think that the mezzalla gets dragged out of position so much by that that the centre is underwhelmed and when faving a setup like yours, I would definitively play through centre and defend with more width.
Imo you should think about underlapping and definitively balamce your side out.
2 wingbacks with 2 inside forwards or if you want 1 inverted winger.
More stable midfield. It seems like a variant on tiki taka so a registra would do as dm if you have over 60% possession, with a bwm and a bbm on midfield, or if you are under a 60% possession, have a halfback as dm with a mezalla and a bwm and then switch the wingback on the side of the mezalla to a fullback
As me anything you didnt understand, I see now my post has become a bit cluttered.
So if youre dominant, Id line up
PF
IF IF/IW
BWM BBM
REG
WB BPD CD WB
SK
That is, if you would rather win 3-2 than 1-0 ofc
If you are often the weaker side:
PF
IF IW
BWM MEZ
HB
WB CD CD FB
GK
0 -
I am currently playing a 4231 gegenpress, yet have failed to archieve real success against smaller teams with stamina depleting quickly and am thinking about switching to a 4231 with:
Tadic (PF)
Rw: Neres
Cam: Zyjech (am-a/s)
Lw: Promes
Cm: Donny van de Beek (dynamic midfielder/mezzalla-s)
Cm: Alvares (playmaker for defence-defend)
Lb: tagliafico (wb-s)
Cb: Martinez (bpd-d)
Cb: veltman (bdp-d)
Rb: Mazraoui (wb-s)
Gk: Onana (Sk-s)
Anybody tips for roles and advice whether or not to switch to a tiki taka with this squad
There is a real talent I signed, a fast and agile striker who needs to focus on finishing and long shots (9-9). He might replace tadic sooner or later
0 -
I've got 2, 1 of which happened to me.
The year is 2020, I just won a double with Ajax and got to the quarter finals of the Champions League. Dest did great and is really close to getting the spot over Mazraoui permenantly. In comes PSG.
Transfer: Mazraoui: Ajax->PSG (96m). The kid literally played 18 games the season, with Dest playing the others.
Oh and somehow, City managed to replace Pep with EtH and they signed Stefan de Vrij of all people (since they need the defenders) for a whopping 120m. What the...?
0
Ajax- what to play my wingers on?
in Tactics, Training & Strategies Discussion
Posted
Thanks everybody who replied!
I am actually struggling with this, since one of my CMs is a natural defending I retrained and does the job really well.
However, the other one is more of a natural CAM (Donny van de Beek) and while he has great workrates, stamina, etc, he lacks defensively.
However, I can not not use my star player. Any advice here?
Thanks a lot anyway everybody❤️