[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

1 minute ago, Totalfootballfan said:

I'd say the efficiency of Bloodlust and the efficiency of Ashbringer is almost the same but Ashbringer concedes about 20%-25% less so that why I prefer Ashbringer when I want to play defensive

For example, if I got a lead by to 1-2 goals then I often switch for Ashbringer or the time wasting tactic and after the chances that I concede is very low

Well, executioner V3 tactic or more successful cerber v2 tactic?

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

30 minutes ago, Totalfootballfan said:

Yes, I added the new long throw-in for Executioner tactic

At the moment I really like the new version of Cerber tactic so can't say with of them is better, it requires producing more testing

 

 

 

I suggest using Executioner V3 / Cerber V2 as your attacking tactics and I suggest using Ashbringer V3 as your defensive tactic 

I have had great success with the Bloodlust tactic, is there any significant performance increase between the ashbringer v3 tactic and the bloodlust v4 tactic? In short, is it worth giving up the bloodlust v4 tactic for the ashbringer v3 tactic?

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

The only difference I can see is that more positions were entered with the cerber and ashbringer v1 tactic, but in 2 matches you would definitely have 1 goal. In the Bloodlust tactic, you take fewer positions but don't score goals. 

Ashbringer and Cerber :

1860 Munich - FC Kaiserslautern (2-1)

1860 Munich - Uerdingen (2-0)

Bloodlust:

1860 Munich - FC Kaiserslautern (3-0)

1860 Munich - Uerdingen (0-0)

I think the wing players are unable to open closed matches. It has become easier to beat big teams with a bloodlust tactic, but extra solutions are needed against small teams. 

 

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

25 minutes ago, Totalfootballfan said:

 

Yeni taktiklerin mevcut ME için çok yüksek bir verimlilik sunduğunu düşünüyorum ve FM20 oynamak için onlara çok sağlam bir yaklaşım buluyorum ve eminim ki onlar için daha fazla iyileştirme bulmak çok zor olacak, ancak herhangi bir gelişme bulunursa önemsiz olacaklar, bu da ekibinizi onlar için yeniden inşa etmeyi gerektirmeyecek

Ama Cerber taktiğine birkaç tweaks ekleyebilirim çünkü bu yaklaşımda bir potansiyel görüyorum ve yine de oynamak için çok sağlam bir taktik buluyorum, çünkü yeni taktiklerin FM20 oynamak için çok sağlam bir yaklaşım olduğunu buldum. daha fazla ME değişene kadar   

With the last two tactics you did, I got the same result when I arrived mid-season. What do you think about this topic?

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

4 minutes ago, Totalfootballfan said:

Sorry, mate... I don't understand your question

I find it works great 

If the opponent is equal to us or has weak strength from us, we use the bloodlust tactics, if the opponent is stronger than us, we use the ashbringer tactics, right?

Let's imagine we are Watford.

Watford - Liverpool (Ashbringer)

Watford - Bolton (Bloodlust)

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

51 minutes ago, Totalfootballfan said:

**********

A MASSIVE TACTIC UPDATE

 

Guys, I've made a massive update for all tactics at OP, some of them have been updated and some of them have been removed from the OP.

 

At moment the OP looks this way:

 

 

 

 

 

The best combo to play -  Bloodlust V3 + Ashbringer V2:

 

Bloodlust V3

 

 

 

Ashbringer V2

 

 

 

 

The second best combo to play -  SLAYER V3 + CRUSHER V3:

 

Slayer V3

 

 

CRUSHER V3

 

 

 

Also, guys... I've want to say that I've deiced not removing Cerber tactic from the OP because I still haven't deiced what to so with it.

 

Have you tested enough of these new tactics? Unfortunately, wing players cannot play as well as the back-footed wing player. If you have tested, can you take a few screenshots? Thank you, I wish you continued success.

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

Just now, Totalfootballfan said:

 

Yes, mate... in this case that's correct 

Thank you. But if both are used for support or offensive duty, does it cause a problem? In short, if two of their duties are the same, should they be support or offensive?

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

6 minutes ago, Totalfootballfan said:

Millet, Bloodlust taktiğini V3'e güncelledim ve DR pozisyonu hatasını düzelttim

One of them is in support duty, one is in offensive mission. Are you sure it's updated correctly?

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

14 minutes ago, Totalfootballfan said:

Ashbringer V1 / Cerber V1'in şu anda en iyi kombinasyon olduğunu düşünüyorum

Defansif oynamak istediğinizde Ashbringer V1 kullanın

Saldırı oynamak istediğinizde Cerber V1 kullanın

Ayrıca OP'de taktik harcanan bir zaman var, zaman kaybetmeniz gerektiğinde kullanılabilir

So what tactics should the matches start with? 

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

10 minutes ago, Totalfootballfan said:

Mate, I can't change tactics when simming so I can't test a combo tactics

Btw, it could be a good idea if let's say you are Man City to start matches vs Norwich and other similar teams with Cerber V1

Which tactic is better? Ashbringer V1 or Cerber V1? Or what kind of usage do you suggest? 

Shall we start the league with the ashbringer tactic, when we fall back, and move on to the cerber tactic? 

Or should we use the ashbringer tactic when we are the host and the cerber tactic while playing away?

And what are the uses of the slayer tactic? 

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

4 minutes ago, Totalfootballfan said:

 

Mate, here are few example for you

Let's say you are Norwich City and you play vs Liverpool in this case it doesn't matter where you play home or away - Liverpool always will be using the most attacking approach against you because the reputation difference between Norwich and Liverpool is huge

Other example, lets say you are Man City and you play vs Liverpool at home so in this case Liverpool will chose a defensive approach but if you score ad you start winging then Liverpool will switch for the best attacking approach

So it would a wrong to assume that if you play home then your opponent will be using a defense approach and if you play away then your opponent will be using attacking approach

When you say teams play at home and away "differently" then "differently" means they can play attacking or defensive and that's all, also teams play "differently" when they lead or lose during matches

I do not approach the teams according to their reputation level. I determine the strength of the squad he established that year, according to his prediction in the league.

I leave a few examples of that below and in order to win matches on the road, the team must seriously adapt, regardless of who the opponent is.

 

[FM20 Tactics by TFF]

First of all hello. I have been following you for a long time and thank you for your tactics. @Totalfootballfan I tried the previous tactical combination with many different teams. I would like to convey that I am satisfied with the results. But there is something I want to point out in order to help you. First, home and away tactics should be different. If I give an example from the previous tactical combination;

(Home: Pyromancer * Away: Punisher * While defeated: Executioner)

So why? Because the players play differently when they are hosts, and differently when they are away. Using tactics in this way increases performance even more.

(In short, artificial intelligence has been developed to make you feel more pressure while away.) 

Moreover, I do not find it right to leave the training to the assistant. You should develop a training system that is suitable for the displacement tactic. Do not transfer your training program to your assistant.

So, use different training programs for the host and different training for away.