gofferson
-
Posts
39 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by gofferson
-
-
Hello I want to create a tactic which:
-play deep to create a space behind opponents
-defend like a unit
-attack fast with fluid counter.
Main issue are my forward players play too high and don't wait for rest of players and defenders play ball to them excluding central midfielders.
What should I change to achive better use of space and support forward players.
0 -
Hello, like in topic I want to create tactic with I can create chances to my IF(Rashford)
I notice that passes to rashford go too early and he dribble, loss the ball or make a bad shot.
0 -
1 hour ago, Dereka said:
Some other things go into winning headers in addition to Heading and Jumping Reach or Height. For example, attributes like Strength and Bravery, and maybe things like Positioning as well?
I understand that but my defender who loses the most headers has 14 headers, 16 strength, 15 positioning, 17 jumping so not bad he should win with 170+ striker
0 -
Can someone explain me why my 190+cm defenders can't aerial and my oponents scores a lot of goals with a header even 171 cm striker with 5 aerial.
0 -
Thanks for answer and help
1 -
1 hour ago, Experienced Defender said:
Sorry, but I can't seem to understand your question.
You set up your free kicks like a corners, in the same way?
0 -
So this isn't matter you set free kicks or corners you always use this same method?
0 -
3 hours ago, Experienced Defender said:
I never man-mark on set pieces. 3 aerially and defensively strongest players (2 of which are usually CBs) zonally mark the near post area, center of the box and far post area respectively. One player (usually a fullback) marks far post. One is at the edge of the area and one stays forward. Others are told to go back. That's it.
How often do you train set pieces?
0 -
Hello, I have another problem. I lost goals from set pieces in every game. I lost 8 goals from free kicks in 14 matches. How you set up defensive set pieces. I have tall and stron with good aerial defenders bot nothing working in this part of football
0 -
47 minutes ago, CARRERA said:
That’s correct sir, but you may need to change your set of roles and duties and instructions as well, to fit your new approach.
For example, it doesn’t make sense to go with an attacking mentality, where all players decision making is about to move both players and the ball forward, to denie penetration with ultra short passing instructions and no players who are instructed to create depth and penetrate space. What will happen is: your attacking line will be compressed with no options to move the ball forward and your team will most likely loose possession, try a nonsense cross into a packed box or some sort of long ranged shot. With luck you may score, but it’s highly inefficient.
I agree with you with mentality. Im changing duty of my attacking WB to support and try to play more direct passing with standard tempo. If it doesn't work I add pass into space TI and early crosses. Im still working about understanding combinations of roles, duties, mentality and TI's to get more fluidity to attacks.
0 -
1 hour ago, Experienced Defender said:
If it works for you that way, then great. However, a mere mentality change neither improves attacking play nor changes the core playing style. The mentality is not about that.
It's all about risk. When we lose by one goal we don't have anything to lose so i want from my players to take more risk. I understand mentality in this way.
0 -
30 minutes ago, Experienced Defender said:
Why do you change the mentality? And what kind of change do you make (to more "attacking" or more "defensive")?
Btw, what do you mean by "when we lost goal"? The word "lost" sounds confusing in this context.
Sorry for my English ;) I mean when opponents score against us first goal or we lossing by one goal i change the mentality to attacking until we score goal. After that i back to standard or positive mentality .
0 -
8 hours ago, Experienced Defender said:
How about making these couple of small subtle tweaks:
AF DLFsu
SS
DLPsu BWMsu
CWBsu WBat
CDde CDst CDde
SKde
mentality - start with balanced
in possession - play out of defence (and nothing else for now)
in transition - counter-press (and nothing else for now)
out of possession - higher D-line + split block with the front 3
Results after that changes. During matches i only change a mentality when we lost goal, role of CWB to WB and duty of right WB when we want to hold a result. Thank you for your support guys. Im stubborn so ill try last time this tactic in next season
1st match with changes was vs Atalanta after Sassuolo game 
2 -
Thanks guys for help. The reason why im playing narrow system is lack of attacking wingers maybe in next season ill buy some wingers and change tactic.
4 hours ago, Gdansk said:No sir, when I'm normally logged in on my computer I see it, but like this morning I checked the forum on my phone where I was logged out and I couldn't see my posts in the thread. It showed the last post made from the OP from like an hour ago when I made the post 10 minutes ago, and when I checked into the thread it just wasn't there.
Will be the same with this as well probably. You can delete this of course as it's not for the topic but just to make it clear so it can be checked. Yessir, when I load the forum up in an incognito tab where I'm logged out it just shows your post from 48 minutes ago.
I see normally all your post on computer and phone where im logged out.
0 -
There are results after tweaks. first 4 games were fantastic. Fast and fluid transitions goals from strikers well compact defense. With udinese we have bad luck a lot of chances to score goal but unlucky this time, with atalanta we lost after penalties unlucky again, but game with lazio and rest are disaster. My players forget how to play in style like in the first 4 games after change. What do you think about that.
0 -
27 minutes ago, Experienced Defender said:
Regarding the first tactic:
- what's the idea with (or point of) two defend duties in the midfield (especially as the lateral defend duty is behind of the AF as the more attacking of the 2 strikers)?
- you have only 2 players up front, so the Prevent GKD instruction does not look like a good idea to me
- possession-oriented TIs such as short passing, PoD and WBIB do not really go hand in hand both with your formation and especially setup of roles and duties
- you are using a bit too aggressive defensive instructions - and needlessly so - which is even more of a problem considering your lower than optimal level of compactness (i.e. the DL-LOE distance)
The second tactic looks considerably better than the first one when it comes to the setup of roles and duties. The only tweak I would suggest is changing the LWB's duty into attack and then consequently removing the overlap left (because there will be a natural overlap anyway).
However, some of the instructions could be problematic. For example, much higher D-line can cause defensive issues if your defenders are lacking either speed or tactical intelligence. You also have a needless number of instructions in transition associated with keeper distribution. There is no need to be that much specific, especially when you already use the Play out of defence TI.
Thank you for your answer. The idea with bwm on defend duty behind AFat is to cover left side of pich when a wb is going up. I have a lot hard working midlefielders in team so thats why i have aggresive defensive instructions. The physical and mental atributes are above avarage at my defenders and i don't lost goals from killer balls. Lots of goals i lost from cross to far post and can't neutralize that.
0 -
Hello, after good first season where we end in 4th possition, the 2nd season is an horror. After 15 games in the league we have only 4 wins and 7 losses and my boss give me one month to improve the situation. In 1st season we played 4312 and that was not bad so we start 2nd season with the same system, but after 8 games without win i decided to change to 532 formation but in this system i cant win games and create a lot of oportunites to score goal. 2nd thing is when we create ccc my strikers can't convert them. i have hope you can help in this situation and give some tips to keep my job
0 -
Hello, I want to ask you about your paterns in creating overloads in 4312 formation. I'll glad for tips :)
0 -
How about this project? Im curious about.
0 -
They don't want me like Mourinho in United
0 -
I think my game is broken. He didn't pass to Lincoln but to FB...
0 -
Can I accept that Inwerted Winger can be replaced by Inside Forward role? Because in FM19 it's not IW yet.
0 -
39 minutes ago, Experienced Defender said:
I do not use a DLP in either tactic because I think that none of your central and defensive midfielders is good enough for a playmaker role. Only Ivan might be decent a DLP, but what happens when he cannot play (due to an injury, fatigue, suspension etc.)?
That's the answer what i want
0 -
Thank you very much. I have a question. Why you chose CM(d) role instead of DLP(d) in 4231?
0
[FM23]532 creating space and passing combinations
in Tactics, Training & Strategies Discussion
Posted
Hello i have problem with forcing opposition to drop deeper and create more passing combinations on their half. Im not talking about possesion football but more direct attacking where every line is involved. Where can be problem? Its about mentality and risk taken or should i change tempo and pass directness? I will test it but I will be glad for your opinions.