TJR1989

I have sent saved game file in.

Thanks for the reply. What about for conduct though, going AWOL etc? And within the options was also the ability to issue a warning. So maybe totally removing it is not so realistic, maybe just remove the discipline for poor performance?

Exactly mate, I expect the same reading that, most frustrating thing, SI create these descriptions and they don't correlate in game, annoying

I think you are right, I have noticed on this year's game in particular, the players do less and less of what you ask them to do on the field. The instructions don't seem to correlate onto the pitch with what SI has said they should. It no longer becomes a game whereby you can change tactic to combat something e.g. stop playing short passing and knock it over the defense as they are holding a high line, instead you just have to work out how the game is setup and find what works which is boring. It should give more east communicable changes, or your assistant / staff should suggest more. Instead when we barely have any shots on target from 10 attempts, all I get is "we recommend working ball into box and increasing tempo" um hello assistant both are already on!

This is what I have been been experiencing, I have reported this as a bug and it was declined due to lack of evidence. I notice it alot, for no reason, the players no longer able to score or hit the target when before they were able to loads

This been looked into and fixed?

Exactly, this is my point. The game is telling me that is what should happen, but 9/10 that does not happen, so something is broke???

They are not winning comfortably. You don't seem to understand do you. The game is made with certain scripting, ultra attacking means go for it, so 8/9 times out of 10 on this setting you would think chances would be being created at either end, like in real life, do you watch football?? You can see others are also making constructive feedback points, and not you can see I wasn't just stating things because I was "loosing" you can't seem to have any other response than stupid ones. Some of the admin on here can take constructive feedback, you clearly can't. If you aren't happy to help customers don't bother. But when scripting says something, you would expect to see that represented in the game 9/10 not the other way round!

EXACTLY!!! The data hub is useless it tells me to do what I am already doing, "work ball into box"

My tactic is successful, majorly in fact as I have massively overachieved in both of the seasons played, but these niggles are annoying when you are doing everything in the scripted game to correct them and it is not happening. I have only lost 3 games this season (well over half way through) so i am not complaining about loosing, instead trying to understand how and why the instructions given in the game do not work. If you look at evidenced based football manager on youtube, you will see he statically proves the crap SI put into the game stating it does something when it goes not! For example, shows how certain trying sessions which are meant to improve certain attributers or produce certain results do not. And this is not a small sample size or study, it is large! It needs more people like that on board, not someone like yourself who cannot take criticism or constructive feedback instead just says utter generic things that you should know and hardcore FM player will have already tried! Useless

I don't use the default (although did as a test for 10+ games). I have tried near post and back post, this is the near post ...... This was phenomenal last season, scoring me a goal nearly every game with JWP and Lucca!

I've tried the default for 10 games, then 2 different variants for another 10+ games each. You have probably gone and made defending corners too OP by trying to combat the over scoring from them