Mik_Fe

i never tell "i'm not a tactic expert" I want only some advice because sometimes i lost myself in a glass of water.. and I need to reopen mind and eyes...

The players..

yes! This is the setup at this moment and in the last 7 matches (8 if we considering friendly)

Milan is the last match with my old tactic... With Spezia is the first with this new setup.. look what a result!! 5 gol conceded in 10 matches (Ceccano is a friendly).. great.. the balance of risk it was the key of this success, we keep possession in the final third better and we dont give the possibilities of counter at the opponent.. great.. I continue with this test.. thanks guys, you open my eyes

I try to make some advice in my tactic creation, and i need to tell that your advice are more efficent.. like we don t lose the ball in the final third, beacuse we press high and we cant lose the ball when we are in possession.. so, i put only 2/3 roles with risk passes(bpd,rpm and if, maybe if but i can put iw with different pi than other iw), the forward is a pf with take less risk, the same dm-s.. fb without go forward help to build up the offensive phase, his pi is to stay wider, try to put him to support the phase in all construction.. with this modifies i see the possession like 60/65% in every 6 games that i ve play.. the duo Cm-so and Rpm is fantastic.. cover the pitch and drop off to receive the ball (rpm has direct passes with risk, is the creator).. i like this setup for now..

it s not mine Johnny made

I see your post, in your opinion is the same if the creative player is into midfield? I mean invert RPM and BWM, I put DM-S and RPM into midefield.. or do you think that the creative player needs to be into the central of the pitch? I know what you mean, about risk.. now i understand, thanks for the comment of @cmonreds

FB better than WB? because the first dont have go forward correct? why dribble frequently? he dont have dribble more in PI they, do you mean WB or playmakers? beacuse in my idea the WB have PI dont risk passes.. I see that there are some people that knows a lot of this thread, does someone advice me some roles idea to start this project? because i write my idea but at now i dont understand a lot

what do you mean Johnny? I understaind your idea that I need some players whit risk passes, but not too much, correst? in theory i can put one BPD ( like advice by @CJ_Randell ) one in the midfield like AP and 2 minimun into attack (like IF and forward), I understanid your comment? But with your experience, which are the best combination of roles, i see the combination of role (pdf file) but i dont find answers... for this reason i put some roles in my theory idea..

Hi everyone!! Does anyone can help me to find best role for 433 possession based? I take a look at discussion of Johnny Ace about 433.. My idea for now is: SK-S WB-S (both) CD-D (both) DM-D (or DLP-D??) CM-S (or RPM or DLP-S???) AP- S or AT?? IF-S (both) DLP-A (or CF-A??) Please, take me some idea to create this tactic.. and if anyone test this type of tactic, tell me some advice! thank you so much guys!!!

HI! I'm answering based on what I've seen in the game and based on how much I know how offside works. The defense line (which provides equal duties) moves forward with the ball exposed, i.e. when the opponent has the possibility to advance or pass forward, by adopting "step up more" your line will advance towards the midfield slightly, so as to putting the opponent offside.. the fact that he smashes towards the midfielders or midfielders is a consequence.. So your question is true, I answer yes, this is what I saw in game ..

Hi everyone! I wanted to ask what you think about adopting training in the 4 phases of the season: -Pre-Season (block 1) -From September to December (block 2) -From January to March (block 3) -From April to the end of the season (block 4) The idea I have is to divide the load based on the period (and also on the quantity of games present), in theory: block 1: high load block 2: medium load with some physical appeal block 3: medium load block 4: light load I also thought, given that in blocks 1 and 2 we are at the beginning of the season, surely the workloads must be such as to put fuel in the players' legs, while when we enter block 3 and block 4 the already decisive matches begin ( therefore where you have to try to have the top players or starters always ready) and focus more on maintaining physical fitness without overloading it. Has anyone ever adopted a similar training style?

in fact it's just my curiosity because I don't understand how it's possible that in '23 I followed a possession tactic where I dominated for years and this year I'm having a lot of difficulties, but I'm curious to know if anything changes or not..

Guys.. I think I'm getting lost in a little stupid doubt... but I wanted confirmation from you. In my tactics I have the default time "slightly lower", but if I reduce the time by 1 everything remains the same (tactical intensity and familiarity, even the description remains "slightly lower"), same thing for the team size : if I leave it in default or increase it by 1 the familiarity remains the same. My question is: does everything really remain the same or is it a "graphic" problem? PS: I only noticed this with a positive mentality, I haven't tried other mindsets.

I try to solve it byself… but i dont find solution.. i can build up the off phase with DLP-s and RPM or RPM and AP-s or DLP-s and AP-s.. did you think @Rashidi that the two in the middle of midfield will be RPM and AP-s ? With HB or another role?