flauta kicma

thanks

I would like to do it in third season. but thanks..

Ok.... Now I won Serie A in first season with this tactic that I made following logical principles. No player instructions. There is nothing familiar from FM Arena tactics in here, only logical gegenpress set up. Now I am even more confused.

Smart budgeting.

Now I started with Torino. I'm using 4231 again, but with much different rolls than on the FM Arena (altough with Celta I didnt downloaded tactic, it was maybe 70% similiar to Arena, now maybe 30%). There are different roles on full backs, one midfielder, a winger... If we don't count the centre backs and the goalkeeper, only three positions are the same as in the Arena. Team instructions are almost default Gegen, I would say that with an average team I have very good results again. It remains to be played much more hours for some wise conclusion, but it seems to me that on first sight this is a possible proof that the tactics from FM Arena are not so powerful. Simply, any meaningful Gegenpress is able to achieve results...

Thanks for the contribution. It bothers me that the tactics at FM Arena are logical. It's not an asymmetric setup, there aren't 7 players on the attack, etc. And if I were to put together a gegenpres tactic, I would go in that direction... Here I put together a new tactic, which has some new differences from the tactics at the FM Arena, the results are again similar, quite successful. I went to save and load and finished the season with this new tactic. This is not much different from the tactics I used on FM 23. That's why I asked if it's a cheat tactic that I use, because I would have come to those logical foundations myself. That way, it doesn't seem like a cheat to me, but then again, I don't want results that are unrealistic. And now it's hard to ignore these principles that I picked up at FM Arena...

ok. I am not trying to exploit game. Only trying to find approach that is satisfying for me as a player (who doesnt have much time) but still challenging. That is why I havent downloaded tactic, only tried to implement some principles like FB instructions etc.. I dont have anything against plug and play, but if it will bring me UCL in 8th, not 4th season. this was looking nice because shape isnt unrealistic, it isnt some stupid assymetric foundation, I havent implement everything.. but still I dont want to win it all in fourth season. So your advice would be not to look on FM Arena page? My initial question was - is it easy in general or easiness comes from type of tactic.. But ok, I get it

Hello. I'm doing very well. I won the Champions League with Vigo in the fourth season, the Dutch title with Twente in the second season... This is the team with which I won the Champions League. I used the basic postulates from FM Arena. I didn't downloaded the whole tactics, I just saw the basics. And that is - to play with FB on attack, AM on attack, .. But unlike FM Arena - my left wing is an ordinary W, not IF, there are some other team instructions, I don't play with both DM's etc. It seems to me that all this postulates didn't work so well on the previous patch, as if all this works only on this patch... Now... can this tactic be considered unrealistically good? Are there any directions, principles (I don't mean literally tactics) with which the results would be more realistic, or is it simply all on this path that I used here? Do some of you have same impression that it is bit easier after last patch?

is it just me or is the game a bit easier after the new patch? i thought patch didn't affect the gameplay

can you give more specific with tactic, formation, team instruction...? thanks

Hello... Just one question.. Does the new patch distribute the goal distribution better between players? In FM 24 the strikers are not scoring like it was the case in earlier editions of the game. I have tried numerous teams, numerous tactics, numerous world class strikers, numerous roles, basically everything I can possibly think of, but the strikers are not scoring enough goals like it was for example on FM 23. Is it still the same?

Unbelievable. For sure I am not buying next game. It is shame that just today I switched to FM 23, it is not normal that we need to wait until spring. It is simply rude from SI, that is something you can not do to buyers of your product. But their bad attitude towards customers will be avenged in some way, it always does. They made it more flashy in terms of animation (some people call ME but that is not ME), but everything is just stupider. CM 01/02 now is easy too, but it is intelligent. This is just Netflix like stupid, without AI as factor in term of squad buliding, without any tactic consistency, now they ruined striker efficiency too, everything is just odd with this game edition, it doesnt look like older versions at all. Strange...

thank you all for answers

Any hint when the new patch might be out?

On this FM 24, the striker just doesn't score for me like before. For me, the most interesting part of the game is to see if a striker can have more goals than performances, but in a realistic ratio. It doesn't work on this game. This example is extreme, but it captures the situation nicely. How about my tactics? What to change? By the way, these are not all the player roles that I have tried, but it doesn't work at all. It's similar for me when I play with two strikers. Here is the save with Werder in the beginning, but when I played with Roma after 15 seasons I had two of the best strikers in the game, won 3 Champions Leagues in a row and still they didn't have particularly good goal ratio. Is there a trick for strikers to score more? P.S. I don't want to open a new topic, but it seems to me that tactics with two DM's instead of two MC's work better since FM 23. Is it just me who is annoyed by it?