Jump to content

  • Board "angry" at Back Up Goalkeeper Signing...

    Cobblers

    By Cobblers

      • Public Status: Need More Info Files Uploaded: None
     Share

    Not that this is a bug as such, but I feel something that should be addressed and looked at when signing back-up goalkeepers.

    For example, I signed Jed Steer as a Emergency back up goalkeeper for £1.1m from Aston Villa. He is on a meagre £17k per week. In my opinion, the signing serves the purpose versus value/cost.

    However, the board are "angry" at the signing/Fan reaction is D.

    This has been common place for a few years now, but why? To me this doesn't make sense. MUFC (and other teams) have often signed an elder GK purely for emergency cover. The reaction to the signing isn't realistic in relation to his cost, wages, and role within the team. So good business if you ask me. 

    There are no restrictions to player purchases (from an age perspective) either.

    See following images.

    image.thumb.png.d7fc181980287ac2e5415772ee33317c.png

    image.png.2fb1bba9c92ee8effadc17e3dba58d17.png

    0
     Share
    Go to issues

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    • SI Staff
    Michael Sant

    Thank you for making us aware of this. Would you be able to share your save game in which this is happening (ideally before the signing is confirmed) so that our QA team can take a look into this further? A guide on how to do so is available here:

     
     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...