Sam W Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Im Manager of the New York Red Bulls (MLS) and happen to realize that Tottenham won the PL in the first season of the game. Its a bit weird because they arent even a top 4 club, overrated???? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Hacker Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 Not really, they won it in my first season, they have quality players if tey all stay fit, then given a lot of luck they could feasibly win the league in real life... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whirlwind Posted December 11, 2009 Share Posted December 11, 2009 You're havin' a laugh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam W Posted December 11, 2009 Author Share Posted December 11, 2009 I mean they will probably give us a thrashing (Wolves) tommorow anyway, but winning the PL even with maybe a fully fit squad is very unrealistic??? If they had a full fit squad top 4 finish would be more believable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vacant0 Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Came second in mine - only lost out to Chelsea on goal difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlow Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 think they've won the prem twice in 4 seasons in 1 of my saves, did raise my eyebrow to say the least Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lutontown1991 Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 They have a good squad and can play attractive football Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugo_Cienfuegos Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 If you think purely objectively, looking at the on paper talent the Spurs squad and then simulate a season where the other teams suffer poor luck in contibuting matches and Spurs good luck is wholly unrealistic? I think Spurs have next to no chance of winning the league nut it is not an impossibility. Given that each first season is like a simulated 'alternate' reality orchestrated by FM then I woulna say Spurs are too overated. Definitely not worth four question marks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kain Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Crouch is very overrated in the game imo. On our day, we can beat any team in the league. The problem is we completely and utterly collapse as soon as something goes wrong (hence throwing away good leads against Man Utd, Man City and Everton in recent years, not to mention capitulating after the first two goals against Arsenal and being unable to ever beat Chelsea). Its hard to replicate that in the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yid Army Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 WTF do you mean 'unable to beat Chelsea?' Have you forgetton the 1-0 win last year, the cup final and the bonfire night match? Although I guess you are used to saying that, as before that we were **** against them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
balaban Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 If you think purely objectively, looking at the on paper talent the Spurs squad and then simulate a season where the other teams suffer poor luck in contibuting matches and Spurs good luck is wholly unrealistic?I think Spurs have next to no chance of winning the league nut it is not an impossibility. Given that each first season is like a simulated 'alternate' reality orchestrated by FM then I woulna say Spurs are too overated. Definitely not worth four question marks. I would say that. A couple of weeks ago I was testing the speed of my PC with a few different parts I had laying around. For that I timed how long it took to holiday through the first season of FM a bunch of times........Everton or Tottenham always won the league, except for the one single Chelsea win. Man Utd never seemed to make it into the top 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butros Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Look at last years game where Gunners were close to unbeatable, when did they win anything the last time? Can the financial part make teams like Man Utd and Liverpool weaker? It think it's very hard to make the game behave just like in real life and I don't expect it to either, but that's just me... COYS, JB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just-Wool Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Shock results happen, teams who are not supposed to be close win things. It's football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reece1973 Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 But this is liking saying Man City winning the league in my game and being virtually unbeatable being unreal. Its a game. My mate always manages Wrexham and already he has them in the Premier League.Would this happen in real life.NO!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheeshy Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 but this is liking saying man city winning the league in my game and being virtually unbeatable being unreal.Its a game. My mate always manages wrexham and already he has them in the premier league.would this happen in real life.no!!! maybe 10 10 10 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
runaldy Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 I manage Real Madrid. On my second season, Tottenham won the ECC. They also beat Barcelona in semi final... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death. Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 Shock results happen, teams who are not supposed to be close win things. It's football. The beauty of football is in its unpredictability, but the beauty of a league system is that it reduces that factor and rewards the most consistent team, generally meaning the best team (on paper/how they are managed) wins the title. I don't think Spurs could win the title by luck. They have some good players but they're a hell of a way behind Chelsea. Once you get past Defoe, Modric, Lennon and Palacios i don't think they are particularly special. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitja Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 I did a lot of testing recently and Spurs have always qulified for CL. Chelsea won PL most of time with Totteham comming second, Arsenal almost every time came 6th. Mancester United won the league just once. there's much more that influences these results than just player quality. for example in 4-3-3 formation wingers won't score as much as irl. having said that, imo, many Spurs players are over-rated, with maybe just Lennon being slightly under-rated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wackettdagenham Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 I mean they will probably give us a thrashing (Wolves) tommorow anyway, but winning the PL even with maybe a fully fit squad is very unrealistic???If they had a full fit squad top 4 finish would be more believable oh dear, oh dear, oh dear - so much for the thrashing This is evidence in real life anyway, why Tottenham probably will not get top 4 place, not to say it is not impossible if they were to keep the likes of Woodgate, Modric and King fit. But if there were to get rid of some dead wood from the squad namely Keane, Bentley, Pavlyuchenko, Hutton and possibly Jenas and get some quality players in then they might have half a chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamedude Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 Tottenham are too good on this game (Well at least on 10.3) Fact. They've won 3 consecutive titles under Harry, comfortably. Reached 2 Champions League Finals. And tbf, their squad hasn't changed much. o drastic buys apart from 2 good signings of Pandev and Hazard. However, nice to see Modric as a Spurs legend. Confusing that Redknapps only Favored Personnel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falahk Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 Arsenal (trained by Frank Rijkaard) was the premiership side doing best while i was still at Toon in my save, with 1 league win and 3x 2nd places, as of late Aston Villa have also been dominant, City did also do decent so what am i saying with this? not every game is the same Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamedude Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 Arsenal (trained by Frank Rijkaard) was the premiership side doing best while i was still at Toon in my save, with 1 league win and 3x 2nd places, as of late Aston Villa have also been dominant, City did also do decent so what am i saying with this? not every game is the same Ah however, they do seem to win it on every 3 out of 5 games. If you don't manage that league or are a smaller PL team. I don't mind them winning it, just seems odd the way Man Utd one of the two strongest teams in the league sometimes even fail to make top for, even when they have a fantastic manager. Chelsea are abit more consistent on games, they normally win it most likely in the first season. I love how liverpool always miss out on Champions League spot, in my 2012 Brazil save, they've gone through 3 managers (All Spanish), on the brink of relegation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sead Muratic Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 I don't want to be a cynic, but if you simulate the league in full detail, there are times when goalkeepers can become a factor in determining the league winner. If you think your Wigan or Birmingham are having big problems with opposition's superkeeper, AI's big clubs like England's big 4 have it worse! In my save, they are so dominant with possesion in every game yet tend to score 1 goal for every 15 chances. They drew and lost a lot of games they should have won by 5-0 if not for superjensen, supergordon, superjussi etc. Tottenham is the best clubs without that curse. That's how they, or City, win it sometimes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamedude Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 EDIT Now four in a row. However, there team does look very strong now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 They got relegated in the first season of one of my games, no joke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamedude Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 They got relegated in the first season of one of my games, no joke. Rofl-Canister. Wish that would happen to them on my save. FOUR IN A ROW! Even Fergie couldn't manage that :O EDIT: No worries, he's retired now and Spurs are guaranteed relegation now. Rafa Benetiz has taken over LMAO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 I think it might even have been in the game ive been playing recently, i'll check which game it was and get a screenshot up here tmrw sometime, not right now though! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanNUFC Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 Actually i remember it was in my newcastle save, will get that sorted sometime. I got jenas for cheap as they transfer listed their main players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indi75 Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 Spurs not made it into the top 5 in any of my 6 current career games. Good side. Done well in Europa, and won the FA Cup, but it being a game, and reality being altered the second we step into it, it's not exactly an issue if they win stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samb_95 Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 I've seen it happen before many times - clubs not in the "Top Four" winning, mostly with Tottenham or Man City, but have also seen it done with Everton as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xennaz Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 I usually see Spurs, Man City and Everton outperforming 'Pool and Chelsea. Ancelotti just got sacked, actually, in my game. Arsenal finish in the top four, but City and Spurs make up the other two positions. And Spurs just beat Barca twice in Europe! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 yeah aand everton a top 4 club? noooo surely not.. soooo unrealistic and birmingham a top 10 club... shocking... tottenhams squad is easily good enough for a top 4 finish... with the likes of defoe , crouchy, modric, huddlestone and lennon... easy. they just havent yet... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samb_95 Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 I usually see Spurs, Man City and Everton outperforming 'Pool and Chelsea. Ancelotti just got sacked, actually, in my game. Arsenal finish in the top four, but City and Spurs make up the other two positions.And Spurs just beat Barca twice in Europe! What, in the first season, you must be joking!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cougar2010 Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 Mine looks fairly realistic. For the record I have every league running and have never managed in England. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
razorr666 Posted April 11, 2010 Share Posted April 11, 2010 Im currently managing tottenham, finished second in my first season. Chelsea won and were miles above the rest of us. I won the PL second season, but only just, and into my third now and im cruising at the top. Iv made a few change sto the team, but generally only bought youth, the team is fairly strong as it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yid Army Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 We need a new striker, centre-back, and possibly right back in real life to compete like we do in the game. In the game, Crouch is a top player instead of a useless beanstalk, King and Woodgate both stay fit, and Corluka is better going forward. No doubt we'll end up with bleeding Matty Upson and John Carew or another couple of muppets IRL though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedore Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 I dont think they are as bad as a lot of people would like to make out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR866Gunner Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 i believe they won it in my first season a very unsuccessfull time at kilmarnock,we started well then lost the plot! They (Tottenham) always have the potential but falter when you least expect it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunt Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Im not really surprised, in my game the finished 2nd in my first season then won it second time around. Harry Redknapp makes some good signings aswell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B4L Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Even though I have seen them do that well several times, it's hardly a rule. On my current file (I'm not in England) they have finished 9th, 4th, 10th and 6th in the first 4 seasons. Harry retired after getting them in into the top 4 and was replaced by a slightly less successful van Basten. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yidd0! Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Being a Spurs fan, suprisingly enough - I've only been them a few times... I prefer to play as the obscure teams. As far as IRL and FM differences with Spurs: on paper we have a fantastic team with depth. Also Harry is a great manager, however FM cannot replicate out general 'Bottled-it-ness' when playing the top clubs. Thats the only major difference. We have a good enough team to finish 4th IRL IMO, just lacking in guts at times. I'm still hurting from the Pompey defeat. no more said As far as FM for spurs, they are VERY easy to win the league with in 2nd season. Cant say I've seen us win the league in the 09/10 before. Also, Huddlestone turns pretty much World Class a few seasons in which helps. Get 35mill for Modric, buy Hazard and your laughing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 In my first season as Arsenal, Spurs was challenging in the top 3 all season, but towards the end, they let things drop and finished 6th. Strangely though, in the second season (I am 6 games in), they are 15th with only 1 win. Thats what happends when you sell Modric in the summer break to Man City. Fools. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewer85 Posted April 12, 2010 Share Posted April 12, 2010 Pavyluchenko isn't deadwood, he's awesome. And why has no-one mentioned Gomes? Sure, he had a catastrophic first few months - but he's world class, and he's proved it in several games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.