fmphil Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 for example if i get a average rating for a player above 7.00 for a match or a season i think that player has done well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nottingham Forest Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I generally think that if a player get a rating of 7 or more hes done good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Play Up Pompey! Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I usually praise my players in the media if they get 7.50 over five games. I think anything over 7.10 over a season is good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
x42bn6 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Largely depends on how this rating is compared with the rest of the team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnlc Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I like my team to have above 7's and over 7.5's for attacking players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robioto Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 7+ for Central Defender, Defensive Mids and Goalkeepers 7.5+ for Full Backs 7.75+ for wingers AMC and Strikers This is with a top team though, so my standards are higher. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 I think 7s are a generally good score for a top level team. Players who get goals and assists should be doing better than that though. Its a shame goalkeepers dont get better ratings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
heathxxx Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 How I view match ratings, depends on the positions they're playing and the overall team performances. For example, in games where my team dominates and scores lots of goals, it's hardly surprising to see central defenders and the keeper have lowish ratings. That's because they've had very little to do to earn higher ratings. I'm also a little sceptical about the accuracy of performance ratings given for the central DMC slot. I believe the ratings still favour more offensive play, over the defensive play that would normally be expected of the position. Generally speaking though, given the tactical setup I'm currently using, I would look for 7.00+ from the keeper, 7.20+ from defenders, 7.30+ from the central midfielders, 7.50+ from the attacking midfielders and forwards. That's based entirely on the players I have available and the settings I use for them. Younger players I'm more lenient with, for obvious reasons. They're still developing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GioGio85 Posted August 24, 2010 Share Posted August 24, 2010 Ratings definatly favour attacking players. I wonder if this will be addressed in the new FM? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.