Mr U Rosler Posted November 19, 2013 Share Posted November 19, 2013 I often see my strikers taking shots with their weaker foot and i've been wondering about 2 footed strikers. Anyone got any insights into how much of an advantage having 2 footed players upfront might be? Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Presidente Posted November 19, 2013 Share Posted November 19, 2013 Makes no difference to me. Others may disagree or adhere to propaganda but I have to see proof either way. In the real World at the top level does it matter that much? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Odom Posted November 19, 2013 Share Posted November 19, 2013 I read an article, a few months back, that stated two footed players where overestimated in real world football. The scientists who studied this came to the conclusion after hours of research. They used a system to assess a players capability by using statistics like the ones used in "moneyball" and offered scientific help to real world football teams. The article read football coaches were often training players on their weaker foot, while their data showed it had no significant value for that type of position. I believe they did make an exception for strikers because the ability to shoot at goal in tight spots was an advantage to them. Can't say if it translates all that well in FM though, my data doesn't stretch that far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
heddy Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 they are good at the fm14 short pass corner cheat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 I fully recommend an either footed striker, especially if they're a lone forward. Because of how CA weighting works, the player's attributes will look slightly worse than someone who only uses one foot, but a 16 finishing either footed player is much more useful than a 20 finishing single footed player - that 20 finishing will be possible a lot less often than the 16 finishing because either footedness allows them to be better in more situations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auqakuh Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 There really needs to be a "uses outside of foot" PPM - for players with suitably high technique, of course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 I swear there used to be one, has it been removed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
etcetera Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 Oh definitely dual footed over single footed players. Wide players, fullbacks Really useful as they're more dynamic in which way they go to, can go down the line or cut inside towards the middle, can also help get crosses in after they go down the line. Eg a left footed player on the right side of pitch will need to cut back to whip in a cross. Central midfielders Increases passing options and ball retention, particularly if they're shown towards a certain part of the pitch, they can often cut back and spread play to the other side. Forwards, other players when shooting. A single footed forward would likely be shown towards his weaker foot side when he receives the ball, and when he dribbles he'll have a tough time finding an angle for a shot as he needs to cut onto his stronger foot. Will also help when he's in acute angles as he can use his outside foot for another option. If I gave a dollar away everytime I had a striker in the box but on his wrong foot and unable to score because if angle problems or having to cut onto other foot, there'd be no poverty in Africa, or I'd just be homeless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auqakuh Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 I swear there used to be one, has it been removed? I thought there was one too, but not seen it either in a long time or never, depending on whether I was imagining things or not... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althaz Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 I swear there used to be one, has it been removed? There definitely used to be one, but I don't think there is anymore (at least players who I would expect to have it don't). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawee Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 Always been a big fan of two-footed attacking players, not just striker. They open up so many tactical options. For example, if your DLF only has a rightfoot, it's very ineffective to set up a tactic where someone runs up the left side because when he has his back to goal, he can't may a good layoff to his right hand side. If he's two-footed, it's a lot easier to set up a tactic where you have deep runs from both sides, giving him the option to lay it off to either side. Much more difficult to defend, and more versatile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Odom Posted November 21, 2013 Share Posted November 21, 2013 There definitely used to be one, but I don't think there is anymore (at least players who I would expect to have it don't). Couldn't find the option in the player search panel, so it's probably removed. Did find PPM there: 'attempts to develop weaker foor' never seen that one before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigfacemonkeyman Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 Couldn't find the option in the player search panel, so it's probably removed. Did find PPM there: 'attempts to develop weaker foot' never seen that one before. This really interests me, I wondered how SI were going to get round the CA problem. Is this it and does any one know how it works? By the way, Ackter swears right, that PPM is in FM10. (I knew that living in the past would pay off one day) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eple Posted November 22, 2013 Share Posted November 22, 2013 I've tried it on a few players. It took like 6-8 months or so, all but one succeeded, but it only gave them a slight bump in ability on weaker foot. A couple of players stayed at 'very weak' after succeeding and one changed to just 'weak'. The younger players didn't seem to loose anything from it, but a 21 year old more developed player lost between 0.5 and 1 in almost every ability maybe a week after completion, but I don't know if it was poor training or the weak foot eating up his ca-points. As for the PPM I also remember it, but I think it was just a cosmetic one and had no effect on the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigfacemonkeyman Posted November 23, 2013 Share Posted November 23, 2013 I've tried it on a few players. It took like 6-8 months or so, all but one succeeded, but it only gave them a slight bump in ability on weaker foot. A couple of players stayed at 'very weak' after succeeding and one changed to just 'weak'. The younger players didn't seem to loose anything from it, but a 21 year old more developed player lost between 0.5 and 1 in almost every ability maybe a week after completion, but I don't know if it was poor training or the weak foot eating up his ca-points. As for the PPM I also remember it, but I think it was just a cosmetic one and had no effect on the game. Smells like CA redistribution to me. Couldn't find anything in the manual, is there an in game explanation about training the weaker foot? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Odom Posted November 23, 2013 Share Posted November 23, 2013 It is a known fact that two footed players have worse attributes compared to a single footed player of the same CA. So training the weaker foot will drain attributes.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.