Lack solidity

[beingaddicted]

Hi! I created this tactic with the following premises:
1. Control the ball game;
2. CB to undertake construction;
3. WB responsible for width and depth;
4. Coverage DM;
5. CM game builder;
6; MEZZ giving mobility and appearing from behind;
7. DLF downloading on the ground to power up the game and free up space for Mezz;
8. AF stretching the team;

[beingaddicted]

In offensive terms I even think it has gone well. However, I think we allow many opportunities for opponents. What do you think I can improve?

 

[beingaddicted]

In the image below we see what is intended offensively

In this image we also see that the team sometimes reverses the offensive midfield triangle. What is also intended.

 

Edited December 27, 2021 by beingaddicted

[beingaddicted]

As I said, offensively I've enjoyed it but I still think we've given the opponent a lot of chances. What do you think I can do to improve this? What do you think the tactic looks like?

[DarJ]

I think the channel between the WCB and CWB could be a weakness for you. You can see that in those channels I highlighted 2 opposition players that are in decent position to counter attack if they win the ball back from you. Obviously this is going to depend on the tactic you are playing against. what kind of goals are you conceding?