steve.bs69
Members+-
Posts
40 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Everything posted by steve.bs69
-
In three seasons you reached Serie A with Casertana (that probably will remain in Serie C for ages irl) and you're currently 7-8-3......this says it all, but here some people still discussing about tactics, players movements, strategies instead....sorry, but i find it absolutely ridiculous It's so clear that this game is ridiculously easy, clearly made for teenagers to win all with whatsover team they manage....but we cannot say this, it seems prohibited by someone who has to defend it, maybe employed or payed to do so. I cannot find any other explanation in defending a such stupid engine completely out of what happens in real life.
-
Not the actual Empoli with Nicola on the bench, they've a quite strong defensive phase and lost 1-0 to Milan, drew 1-1 in Turin against Juventus Anyway if you play some matches you can see opponent not putting the necessary stubbornness defensively With Roma he even won 4-1 easily against Qarabag in Europa League, while Qarabag irl almost eliminated Leverkusen
-
Here it is, i was playing with vertical tiki taka with balanced mentality. Not only the fact i won but the way i won, too easily, as i said Inter played like a whatsoever Salernitana and the match after mine they won 6-0 against Torino........human vs AI is too easy there's no opposition, no strong defending, AI players seem very weakened. My friend that was playing with Roma won 3-1 against Torino and 5-1 against Empoli, no way in Italy you can win so easily against medium low teams, at least they oppose a valorous defensive phase, here there's nothing at all I took a look at the editor and noticed that inverted fullback and "braccetto di difesa" roles are not contemplated, so presumibly all AI teams that play with a system with 3 defenders are hugely weakened especially on the defensive flanks, because fullbacks are not defending Only human players can use the inverted fullback or the "braccetto di difesa" role, AI teams cannot and this is very poor
-
IF attributes count, imho it should be a 1-30 or 40 or 50 range, because in this way there is too slight difference between a top player and an ordinary one, it is all quite flat as it is atm Irl for ex here in Italy there is huuuuuuge difference even in terms of athletism between a Serie A and a Serie B player and so on, with 1-20 it is not possibile to reply it
-
There is something wrong with the calendar here I play two times within one month against Benevento always in the 1st round Btw do not look at the results, I relegated from Serie A last year (was newly promoted from Serie B but arrived 2nd from bottom) and now i have a really strong team for Serie B level
-
Demanded all to My sport director and president and i'm "only" doing the coach as in real life, so why players continue coming to me asking for new contracts or angry because i didn't give a new contract to one player? I'm not taking care of these sort of things, so dear players go to The sport director or the president cause i do not want to have anything to do with it, that's what i choose!!!!!! Fix this nonsense please
-
Atm i'm battling for 1st place in Italy with Juventus......under 26 I'm playing without Danilo, Alex Sandro, Rabiot, De Sciglio, Rugani, Kostic, Milik and with the likes of Huijsen, Cambiaso, Miretti, Barrenechea, Kaio Jorge, Iling Jr, Soule, Yildiz Did just 10 matches but apart Milan and Inter that are a few points ahead i'm in front of all the others already I'll post something as soon as I'll have done some more matches but it looks very easy so far (4231 formation, positive attitude, style Ball possession) Szczesny, Weah (McKennie), Bremer (Huijsen), De Winter ( Facundo Gonzalez), Cambiaso (Turicchia); Barrenechea (Nicolussi Caviglia), Locatelli (Miretti); Iling Jr (Kaio), Soule (Andrade), Chiesa (Yildiz); Vlahovic (Kean)
-
So, tired written under excellent in your opinion means that he is 90% of conditon and he can easily play.....imho tired means tired anyway.......and excellent plus tired cannot stay in the same icon 😉 Let's say is very very bad explained at least and imho should be fixed or rearranged in another way
-
You see this one for example? Is he eccellent or tired (stanco means tired) And how i know he is tired if not going with My mouse on the heart? You even can read in the last line "fatica basso" so it is fatigue low and "bassi livelli di stanchezza" so low level of tiredness, BUT just under excellent you can read "stanco", which is tired So is he with low level of tiredness or tired? Since, as you can see, both are written (there is stanco tired under excellent but even fatigue low and low level of tiredness in the last line)