BatigoalFM

Up.

Up.

Up. In view of the player's performance over the last few months, a renewal of his attributes is necessary for the next update. His rating and star level must be clearly increased. We can easily write that he is currently the best relay midfielder in the L1 championship.

@sonnevillejr Since the start of the Ligue 1 championship, have you watched any games to possibly update tactics ? All contributions, participations are of course welcome.

There is no question of an extension according to the specialists here ? If it is an extension, it has no value, at least not in the eyes of the original club.

This is not at all counter intuitive, it is simply intelligent management. Having the opportunity to add a talented player to your squad over a limited window of opportunity is clever. The loan secures both an immediate arrival and a safe acquisition. The option to buy is for this purpose and not for the purpose of an extension. If there is an extension, it has no value.

In comparison, Valentin Rongier is underrated. I have opened a topic about this.

Any news on this issue ?

Any news on this problematic issue ?

Clearly, you are wrong on all counts. Ruslan Malinovskyi has not extended his contract and a purchase option is included at the end of his loan at Olympique de Marseille. It's good to see that your so-called reliable information is not. I hope that this experience will bring you more modesty.

I share this. I am disappointed that the feedback from the players is not considered...

TM is not the bible indeed, only the following sources clearly indicate that Ruslan Malinovskyi's contract expires in June 2023. https://www.footballtransfers.com/en/players/ruslan-malinovskyi https://salarysport.com/football/player/ruslan-malinovskyi/ https://www.capology.com/soccer/player/ruslan-malinovskyi-34093/salary-profile/ It is not realistic to extend a player virtually when his contract in reality has a dated expiration. It is incomprehensible such reasoning based on assumptions, disappointing even from the SI teams to see it like this.

Unfortunately the contract does not expire in June 2023 in the official version. The problem has not been solved.

@nico_france Thank you for your contribution ! Would it be possible for you to share the collective instructions with us ? Thank you.

@Tom Elliott If it is a known and recorded problem why is it not corrected ? Knowing that it was reported before the official release of the game.

Unless I am mistaken, this is just a rumour. Officially he has not extended his contract. His contract officially expires in June 2023. https://www.transfermarkt.com/ruslan-malinovskyi/profil/spieler/207877

Hi @kda2602,@Zachary Whyte thank you for your feedback. Hopefully, when the game is released on November 8th, we will be able to put the numbers of our choice on the goalkeepers and players.

@sonnevillejr Excellent comment ! Indeed it could be an interesting way to remove "concentrate the game in the middle".

@sonnevillejr Yes, the positioning is good, but the offensive activity is not. I am trying out the DW role, which seems to have a more direct impact. I have made two schemes : In the second diagram I have also associated the role of DLP(a) with an AF(a). Interesting complicity to see what's more with the option to counter in the transition the depth take from the AF(a) is very interesting (especially the association with the CAR).

@sonnevillejr The WB role for pistons gives better ratings than the CWB role (add "stay off centre" to the individual instructions). I'm not sure why.

@sonnevillejr Indeed it is not possible to add an individual instruction of the type "stay wider" to a DM. Thank you for your development of the roles/tasks.

Yes, that's right. This rule is no longer in force in France. https://www.ligue1.fr/Articles/ACTU/2022/05/31/evolution-reglement-numerotation-l1 However, it should be checked in other leagues for goalkeepers.