zzkeg27

Which bug tracker should I write this on? I've seen a list of bug trackers, but this doesn't apply anywhere. Because the away team performance I think is not a bug.

What I'm trying to say is not a bug issue. I'm asking if it's a problem with the game system. This is something that doesn't need to be reported to the bug tracker.

You don't seem to understand what I wrote at all. I mentioned that I have already seen Liverpool's defeat in real life. However, unlike real life football, FM2023's away game is too much of a balance problem compared to the previous series. This is not a matter of saying that a team like Liverpool lost one away game. Does it make sense that it's scarier to play with a lower-ranked team as an away team than to play Manchester City at my home stadium? FM2023 has a ridiculously low away win rate for all teams, whether they're higher-ranked team or lower-ranked team.

I saw Liverpool lose two weeks ago. However, in FM2023, the lower-ranked team that I play as an away team is scarier than the higher-ranked team that comes to play as an away team comes to my home stadium. Even Manchester City of the opposing team playing at my home stadium was easier than Nottingham Forest of the opposing team where I play as an away team. Currently, in FM2023, the gap as an away team is larger than in the previous series. I even saw FM2022 playing again. Because of the performance problem that I play as an away team, Of course, it is good that FM2023 has become difficult, but the gap between home and away from the lower-ranked and higer-ranked teams does not seem to be balanced. This certainly seems to be a problem. I wonder if there was any intention to make it difficult to play as an away team in FM2023. And I wonder if SI Staff has any plans to improve their performance when playing as an away team.

FM2023 is very difficult to win as an away team. Does it make sense to lose to 20th place Nottingham Forest in an away game? Also, in the game as an away team, 10 players vs. 11 players are defeated. Do you have any plans to modify the performance of the away team?

This season Hibernian manager Lee Johnson,The formation using many 2CMs has been removed and changed to 4-2-3-1 DM and 5-2-3 DM. But no player usually uses DM in a first-tier squad. There are only three players who can play the role of DM in the squad planner. However, there are too many players who can play the role of CM. None of the players playing CM in real football are fit to use as DM positions. Hibernian is a team that used 4-2-3-1 and 3-4-1-2 last season, so most of the original players have never played in the role of DM. Of course, it was a team that didn't need DM based on FM2022 and of course no player plays the role of DM. The database of famous players will be fed back quickly, Leagues that drop in the rankings do not reflect the player's position. If you want to remove the tactics that used to use 2CM and use the tactics that use 2DM, don't you need to do something to make these players' positions available as DM?

However, I remember moving like Mezzala in the 2CM position when pep used the 4231 formation at Manchester City in the past. and AI uses 2DM in 4231, isn't the DM's positional role too lacking? Mourinho's past Chelsea's role of a player like Cesc Fabregas is thought to be a move like an advanced playmaker (support), but it is impossible to implement because of the lack of a role.

The roles assigned to the two midfielders aren't Segundo Volante or Roaming Playmaker. Aren't both midfielders staying too far behind?

Why do you use 2DM instead of 2CM for 523 formation as shown in the picture?

I think 2DM is right even if it is 4-4-2 formation, but why use 2CM instead of 2DM?

I inquired about the same issue. But I was told that the answer deliberately removed the formation.

Unlike existing games, too many CM-based formations have disappeared, and ai Managers are using too many 2dm-based formations. fm2023 formation fm2022 formation