nms1987

Giant PT Realism Covilha 2028.08.30.fm If youll look at Twente left back Mats Rots, I considered trying to loan him in. But when I go to Make an Offer the Loan Offer is grayed out and pop up text reads "player is already on loan". The player is not already on loan though. One other detail, on the players profile page it reads he is making just 5k a year until 1/7/29. If you go to contract details however he is making 125k a year until 30/6/31

Take save Giant PT Realism Covilha 2028.06.09.fm. You'll see in emails that B team manager Fernandes had resigned on June 1. I had not yet named a replacement, I was being promoted and as I recall some of the team reputation boost that promotion gives that makes hiring easier doesn't take effect til July 1 when the new league year begins (which is very annoying) so I was going to wait until then to hire. However, if you sim to June 12 you should get a notification that Rolando Morais de Carvalho has been hired as B team manager. As far as I can tell, under Responsibilities, I control all hiring/firing/renewals for B and youth teams. I did not offer him a contract or even ever look at his profile before. Any idea what this bug is about? PS - I wonder if this is related to an issue I previously reported, which I was told SI would not look in to for some reason, where the B team manager's contract automatically renewed even though I controlled hiring/renewals and had not offered a new contract It is notable to me, and not coincidental, that these issues happen only with B teams and not youth teams. I think a lot of how B teams are set up in the game seems to be flawed, it seems that the game is supposed to view them almost as separate, affiliate clubs rather than essentially just another youth club but one that happens to play in the pyramid, so you get these bizarre instances of the B club hiring its own manager or candidates preferring to work for an u19 squad instead of a B squad because the B squad feels lower level because it plays in a third or fourth tier.

Save: Giant PT Realism Arouca 2027.07.12.fm Try to loan in trialist Thalis. Offer 90% of playing and nonplaying salary and 500k optional clause. It should accept, might have to offer those same terms 2 or 3 times. Click continue and you'll get the "offer accepted" email BUT if you look at the "offer accepted" email it will show 40%/40% salary and 450k option. How does this happen?!

I am trying to sell Billal Brahimi to Middlesborough in the Prem. His permit was denied citing a lack of recent international matches and "he also doesn't have the required number of points from other categories (league matches, level of league, ect)" He has played 80 matches in Liga Portugal over the last 3 seasons with 15 goals and 10 assists. He had 53 matches and 7 goals in Ligue 1 the two years before that. So, a 5 year stretch of being a starter in top 5-7 European leagues. I think we know that Prem teams IRL are easily able to transfer in starters from Ligue 1, Liga Portugal, Eredivise, ect - even if those players don't have "recent international matches." Any idea what is going on here? Is FM maybe not properly calculating points from things like matches in top leagues? If a player from these leagues can't get a work permit who possibly could? Save is Giant PT Realism Arouca 2027.07.12.fm

In the middle of my Covilha save in Liga Portugal 2 I decided I wanted to take on the challenge of resurrecting Arouca, who were getting relegated to Liga Portugal 2. So I decided to make a save point, accept the Arouca job on a different save file, while the also continuing to play the Covilha save. Kind of two divergent paths from a late June 2027 starting point. I noticed that the TV money each received is VERY different. I realize that, depending on the league rules, different clubs can earn different TV payouts. However, I am pretty sure in Portugal everyone splits the same pot evenly, so payouts should be the same and I have looked on the league Rules page and don't see anything explaning why TV payments would be so different On June 30 2027 Arouca gets an email stating they will receive 2.95 million from Liga Portugal 2 TV payments for the forthcoming season. I would be tempted to chalk this difference up to parachute payments (Arouca demoted from Liga Portugal at end of 2026-2027 season, Covilha finished 10th in Liga Portugal 2 in 2026-2027 after spending previous 3 seasons in Liga 3), except that Arouca also gets a second email stating they will get 500k for a parachute payment. Arouca also gets a third email on June 30 that states they will receive 350k "for participating in the Liga Portugal 2." Covilha gets an email on June 30 stating they will receive 300k for Liga Portugal 2 TV rights over the forthcoming season as well as the same "350k for participating in the Liga Portugal 2" email. So Arouca gets basically 10 times the TV money of Covilha. You can take the previously uploaded Giant PT Realism Covilha 2027.06.29.fm and sim ahead to 6.30. You can take Giant PT Realism Arouca 2027.06.26.fm and sim ahead to 6.30 to see the Arouca, or I have uploaded Giant PT Realism Arouca 2027.06.30.fm if you want to see after the emails have arrived I am using the Daveincid Realism Mod on this, so please advise if this issue derives from that. And apologies if this payment different is supposed to be the case for some league reason and I have missed it, but I have looked at the League Rules page and don't see any explanation. Thanks

I (Arouca) have an option to buy in the loan of Alassane Sidibe from Catanzaro. I wanted to see if I could get him for less than the option to buy amount though, so I low balled an offer. They didn't like that, fair enough. They got mad enough that if I try to make another offer, I get the message "The intermediary representing Catanzaro does not intend to present Arouca a new offer at this time as their last offer fell through". I haven't seen this message before... and I lowball lots of clubs haha I get if they don't want to negotiate and deal with more BS from me, but since I have that option to buy agreed in the loan, shouldn't I able to able to submit a bid for that amount all day long and have it automatically accepted regardless of what they want? Same as if it was a release clause? The player is "very keen" on joining me FWIW, so it's kind of crazy that they're essentially allowed to block it Am I missing something? Thanks Giant PT Realism Arouca 2027.06.26.fm

In the middle of the season I convinced the board to create a B team, so now on June 30 it has been created. For some reason, along with this, 4 players agreed playing time is magically moved to B team Regular. 2 of them were originally agreed as Fringe, 2 were originally agreed as Regular Starter. 1 of the Fringe guys (Canario) Actual playing time on June 29 is Surplus, the other Fringe guy's (Ledezma) actual playing time is Breakthrough, 1 of the Regular Starter (Castro) Actual time is Regular Starter, the other Regular Starter actual playing time is Impact Sub. But on June 30, when the B team is officially created, all 4 have their Agreed time moved to B team Regular. And of course they are mad. I don' t think there are any situations where the agreed playing time is supposed to change short of the user making it change. But if it was supposed to happen automatically for some reason I'm not aware of I could see Canario and Ledezma changing to B team regular (though Ledezma at 19yo is a prospect more than a B team regular) but it is absolutely inexplicable for a guy like Castro. Yet another very frustrating inexplicable little FM 24 bug. A second, more minor issue you will notice, as you do this.... You will be prompted on June 30 if the board should create a Reserves team. I assume, in Portugal, this is a U23 team. It's funny that this is now the board's idea for off season improvement given that I asked for it almost every month all season. I actually only asked for a B team after realizing the board wasn't going to give me a U23 (u23s are much more common than B teams for smaller Portuguese clubs). But that's not the bug. The bug is that the board will ask you "We would like your opinion on if the club should create a reserve team" and the only Agree response option is "Its a fantastic idea. He fully deserves a new contract." Which just makes no sense as a reply. Giant PT Realism Covilha 2027.06.29.fm

If you look at save Giant PT Realism Covilha 2027.05.23.fm you'll notice that Maritimo U19 is actually bottom of their relegation group in 1 Div Juniores A with 27 points. But it is not indicated they will be relegated, instead Mafra, Santa Clara and Sporting's U19s are shown as being relegated, despite those 3 clubs having 28 to 33 points. Is this a bug? I wondered for a second if they get some special right (in real life and FM) to always keep their u19 in this division since their might not be enough local clubs for them to play in a lower division... but Santa Clara would face similar issues and they're going to get their u19s relegated as well Curious.

One thing I've noticed across various saves in FM24 is that you are almost always able to trigger a clause, whether it be a release clause or an option to buy clause in a loan, for just a little less than the clause's value For example, in save Giant PT Realism Covilha 2027.05.23.fm I am trying to secure Tulio dos Santos after a loan. The loan had a clause of 120,000 euros option to buy. However, I can offer 115,000 and the clause is still triggered, the green ! sign appears indicating the clause is met even though the offer actually comes up slightly short I have seen this in all sorts of leagues for all sorts of transfer values in various saves. Like a 10,000,000 release clause being trigger-able for 9,900,000 Any idea why this is? I can't be the only one to notice it.