Jump to content

Croatia vs Brazil QF, 3PM GMT Education City Stadium


The_jagster
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 440
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Brazil are trying to get Richarlison to receive the ball with his back to the goal and I can't help but think that Firmino could've been really useful in these situations.

 

Petković on the other side is several tiers below this level of football.

  

Just now, Weezer said:

How is Modric still running up and down the pitch? What do they make these Croatian midfielders out of?!

Too many points in stamina, too few in pace.

Other than Perišić and previously Olić, I can't think of one really fast player we produced.

Edited by GunmaN1905
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GunmaN1905 said:

Petković on the other side is several tiers below this level of football.

That's why I'm thinking, why not just bring somebody on like Ollie Watkins, a level below technically but might manage to get onto a counter 1v1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, The_jagster said:

That's why I'm thinking, why not just bring somebody on like Ollie Watkins, a level below technically but might manage to get onto a counter 1v1

Čolak from Rangers should've been on the list, but unfortunately other than him these 3 are the only semi-useful strikers we have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SouthCoastRed said:

At least extra time will offer another nap opportunity 

Better to have 30min of boring football, than boring studio "experts". :brock:

 

I honestly can't see how we score other than some long-range shot or a set-piece.

Edited by GunmaN1905
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the death of traditional #9 has given us.

Once upon a time, the likes of Mario Jardel, Giovane Elber and Ailton couldn't make Brazilian NT, now they have literally no strikers. Would've been an easy win if they did.

Same goes for most other teams.

Just now, error username in use said:

Surely not a Croatian team happy to do nothing for 120 minutes again

Absolute garbage

Your cage is getting rattled again.

Edited by GunmaN1905
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Astafjevs said:

Croatia have had zero ambition and just played for penalties. Would rather Brazil snatched this in extra time because the approach isn't going to change for a SF

Yes, should have played like S.Korea and get battered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kpain16 said:

Yes, should have played like S.Korea and get battered.

You don't have to throw everyone forward, but at the moment there is zero threat on the break and you're not even crossing to the big man which is the traditional way of scoring if you don't think you're going to pass your way through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, GunmaN1905 said:

Tbh, criticizing a country with not even 4 million residents for not attacking Brazil is a win by itself.

Did you guys watch the match? How would you attack with these options upfront? Do you see the #16 guy who was subbed on? :lol:

Ridiculous. We should have went with guns blazing just to entertain the neutrals. How do you play for penalties ffs? We're cautious but who wouldn't be? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The_jagster said:

at the moment there is zero threat on the break

Because Perišić has 500+ minutes on him and is 33, everyone else isn't good enough and has no pace.

How do you counter with no pace?

Quote

and you're not even crossing to the big man

He wasn't in position since he came on, we had a couple of poor crosses.

 

It's not pretty to watch, but it's all we have.

Edited by GunmaN1905
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kpain16 said:

Ridiculous. We should have went with guns blazing just to entertain the neutrals. How do you play for penalties ffs? We're cautious but who wouldn't be? 

Nobody has said you should go guns blazing.

Understand why you guys are fine with this, but surely you see why from a neutral perspective we're a bit bored? Even if you have many understandable reasons for playing this why including bad attacking options? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pukey said:

Nobody has said you should go guns blazing.

Understand why you guys are fine with this, but surely you see why from a neutral perspective we're a bit bored? Even if you have many understandable reasons for playing this why including bad attacking options? 

Sure. No problem with that. But as GunmaN said, just look it from our POV. Not like we're Germany.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GunmaN1905 said:

Because Perišić has 500+ minutes on him and is 33, everyone else isn't good enough and has no pace.

How do you counter with no pace?

He wasn't in position since he came on, we had a couple of poor crosses.

Fine, so pick somebody with pace then! Brazil is one thing, Japan it was the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...