You make me laugh. If England had been taking this competition seriously this year - why did he change so many players right in the summer? Like most countries they chopped and changed lineups because it was a World Cup year and they didn't have the friendlies to try things. He obviously didn't want to get relegated but it's hardly like his priority was to get the results rather than try a few things. The things he tried didn't work out. Hopefully he has learnt from that. But I doubt it.
And again - I remember your comments about the Nations League. Croatia don't care about it. It's a joke competition. Blah blah blah. Then they win a few games and you start talking it up again. You are full of so many contradictions.
As for the other stuff you said. There is no double standards. Plenty of people don't rate Southgate. You can see that just from reading the threads on here. They think he has got loads wrong. But some people are willing to forgive things because he has managed to get results too. If Capello hadn't ****ed up so badly they may have forgave a few things. It's not a case of foreigners bad. English man good. He's just managed to get better results than pretty much any manager England has had in a long time so some people are willing to give him some slack. Can you really trust that England would pick the right manager as his replacement? Is it really worth the risk right now when he's getting England there or there abouts?
And for the record - I don't rate Southgate either. He took us from a well established PL team challeging for domestic cups. Playing in Europe and got us relegated. He replaced Schwarzer with Brad Jones and Ross Turnbull. Viduka, Hasslebaink, Yakubu and Maccarone with Aliadiare and Mido. Gutted the midfield but right now he's still the best choice just for the simple fact I'm afraid of who his replacement might be.