hjfh Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 About the title of first episode: With relation to the title of the first episode, it's not a typo and is believed to refer to a particular character. Speculation is that it refers to flocke. Who is flocke :confused: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebsy Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Who is flocke :confused: I presume it is a clever name for Locke, and the fact people are part of his flock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LokedOut420 Posted November 1, 2009 Author Share Posted November 1, 2009 Who is flocke :confused: fake locke; jacob's rival that took his form at the end of last season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonPaulWild Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 I presume it is a clever name for Locke, and the fact people are part of his flock. I was under the impression the 'f' part of it stood for fake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert_Goal_Here Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 I was under the impression the 'f' part of it stood for fake. It does. hence Lokedout's post above Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 That poster is definitely a fake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willigogs Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Damon commented on the poster, so I imagine it's legitimate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Why is it so badly designed then? Lost has a huge budget which will be reflected in their marketing spend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willigogs Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Why is it so badly designed then? Lost has a huge budget which will be reflected in their marketing spend. No idea - but it's definitely legit, as it was first shown during Comic Con in July... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 It's just the bottom text looks very amateurish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willigogs Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Well this was the original which is slightly different, but has similar text style: http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/7300000/Lost-Season-6-Poster-Shown-at-Comic-Con-lost-7322919-977-549.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Hmmm....... Maybe it the bad quality of the image rather than the design. Anyway I guess the poster is near the bottom of the list in terms of what I'm excited about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Lindelof apparently ok'd everything in the poster as he knew fans would pick it to pieces for 'clues'. Don't think it's that badly designed, it's fairly simple, they look to be 'pictures' though and not photos so look a little odd. Not sure what past posters looked like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skybluedave Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I get really frustrated reading the Lostpedia forums. So many assumptions being made. For example regarding Jacob and his nemesis. We've seen one short clip of them talking in the intro to the Incident and so much has been read into it. For all we know there could be no nemesis, the bloke in the intro could just be the smoke monster taking on human form. And did the same thing with Locke. We really don't know anything. Also I hope that Jacob isn't some demi god with supernatural powers. I hope he's just a normal bloke (with eternal life ). I reckon the whole visiting the Losties before the came to the island and touching them will be explained the same way Richard was able to visit Locke as a child. The Losties are in the 70's still, as far as we know. Jacob could easily find out where the've come from and visit them off island. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltaroad Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Richard visited Locke as a child because Locke told him to, no? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skybluedave Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Richard visited Locke as a child because Locke told him to, no? Exactly. I'm hoping Jacob visited the Losties, because the Losties told him too or he found out about them from Richard in the 70's and plans on meeting them and touching them in the real world. Not because he's omnipitant and magical. Same reason Jacob ok'd the building of a runway which was being built in season 3 by the others. Jacob knows the Losties in the 70's, they tell him they came on AJIRA flight 316 in 2008, so Jacob gets the runway built in time so they can land. I hope it's not all because he can see into the future or whatever. Edit: This is based on spoilers I read that hinted the Losties are still in the 70's, thought tbh as far as we know they are still in the 70's anyway and have no reason to suspect otherwise Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmr Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I hope there's more Desmond in the next season, easily my favourite character, Des is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I get really frustrated reading the Lostpedia forums. So many assumptions being made. For example regarding Jacob and his nemesis. We've seen one short clip of them talking in the intro to the Incident and so much has been read into it. For all we know there could be no nemesis, the bloke in the intro could just be the smoke monster taking on human form. And did the same thing with Locke. We really don't know anything. I think it's reasonably safe to assume the 'new bloke' is a nemesis from him talking about wanting to kill Jacob and finding a loophole in that early conversation and then him talking about what he'd been through to find this loophole when he confronted him at the end as Fake Locke. I expect the next episode will start from the exact point it left off, this bomb going off or whatever happened. I really hope this starts mid-Jan and I can get a couple of episodes in while I am in England Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 It's it now down for an early Feb start? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I am looking forward to finding out more about Richard's back story and where the hell Claire is! Also, when they come out from the statue and Ben is like "OMG, that's not even the real Locke and I like, so just killed Jacob" and also what the hell is going on with these 'shadow of the statue' people Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 It's it now down for an early Feb start? Don't jest with me! I have been reading that Lindelof said they haven't given him the start date either, he's currently shooting the 8th episode and that if they want to finish it in May (apparently) it can't start too much later than mid-Jan .. hope so Last year is right at the end of Jan IIRC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Well wiki has it down as late jan/early feb so you are probably right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmr Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 20th Jan it starts in the US isn't it? Or maybe that's 24 :/ I doubt we will find out much more about Richard, they had the perfect opportunity to do a backstory on him last season and didn't show us anything Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I heard reports that they will do some explaining, I think 'proper' rumours too, confirmed, like, not just some spotty kids! 20th Jan I might get two weeks of episodes in! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I doubt we will find out much more about Claire either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Just seeing her would be nice! I don't want anymore of her back story, finding out what she was doing last season would be handy though, can't just ignore that. They must do something about that, she's not been sitting in the cabin with Christian as we've seen him out of the cabin (talking with Locke) and Ilyana's lot burnt it down. Is she wandering the jungle again? I know they're going to leave this alone even though they said they would explain it but I really, really wanted to find out more about Henry Gale :/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Maybe the final answer will kinda explain why she is gone etc etc. I doubt we will get much of a Claire specific explanation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMaster#28 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I have a question about season 5, which I'm sure has already been asked before, but hopefully someone will be kind enough to explain it again. I've put it in spoilers just incase someone hasn't seen season 5. Why did Ben stop Locke commiting sucide, only to kill him minutes later? Why not just allow him to hang himself? Was it because Locke gave away the women's name which was the only reason Ben was keeping him alive? Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmr Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Yeah his face changed as soon as he heard the name, that's what he was after Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Ben even answered this when Locke asked him in the show, he said he had important information and 'gee, John, I didn't have time to convince you commit suicide all over again" - or something to that effect Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMaster#28 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Thank you jmr and Razzler Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert_Goal_Here Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 The episode was Dead is Dead iirc. Watching series 5 again knowing what we do at the end is interesting with regards to a certain someone. Certain someone John Locke AKA Flocke. By the way since season 5 is over, is discussing events in season 5 ok? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I was going to ask why the hell people are using spoilers for a previous season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I know, probably no need. I'd say when you watch season 5 again and look at Locke's situation there are clues in there regarding Locke being 'dead'. Ben saying 'dead is dead' and Richard also looking amazed to see Locke and saying something like 'I've seen a lot of things here but I have never seen someone come back to life'. We've still not seen who shot at Juliet and Sawyer in the canoe that time they were skipping have we? Wonder if we'll see that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 What about the people firing arrows during the time skip, was that ever looked at? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert_Goal_Here Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 What about the people firing arrows during the time skip, was that ever looked at? Wan't that meant to be the others? Widmore etc. i thought they said that when Locke, Sawyer and Juilet capture them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Yeah, was 'Others' but not sure how far back, obviously 'far' and they used bow and arrows to show us it's before they got hold of guns Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statistical Approach Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I really don't remember, I'm guessing it wasn't dealt with in any detail. Usually Lost like to show the story from both sides, I had expected to see who was firing etc from their perspective. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I think it was a throwaway line, like when Sawyer and Juliet were captured by the stream, think it was the Hydrogen Bomb one. The Others said that Sawyer shouted out 'meet by the stream' so they knew were they were, he quipped something about organising things with flaming arrows flying at them. Although saying that, they did hold them at gunpoint Sure Sawyer mentioned it then. Maybe flaming arrows as easier to attack from distance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Sandman Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 Ain't it just like the night to play tricks when you're tryin' to be so quiet? We sit here stranded, though we're all doin' our best to deny it And Louise holds a handful of rain, temptin' you to defy it Lights flicker from the opposite loft In this room the heat pipes just cough The country music station plays soft But there's nothing, really nothing to turn off Just Louise and her lover so entwined And these visions of Johanna that conquer my mind In the empty lot where the ladies play blindman's bluff with the key chain And the all-night girls they whisper of escapades out on the "D" train We can hear the night watchman click his flashlight Ask himself if it's him or them that's really insane Louise, she's all right, she's just near She's delicate and seems like the mirror But she just makes it all too concise and too clear That Johanna's not here The ghost of 'lectricity howls in the bones of her face Where these visions of Johanna have now taken my place Now, little boy lost, he takes himself so seriously He brags of his misery, he likes to live dangerously And when bringing her name up He speaks of a farewell kiss to me He's sure got a lotta gall to be so useless and all Muttering small talk at the wall while I'm in the hall How can I explain? Oh, it's so hard to get on And these visions of Johanna, they kept me up past the dawn Inside the museums, Infinity goes up on trial Voices echo this is what salvation must be like after a while But Mona Lisa musta had the highway blues You can tell by the way she smiles See the primitive wallflower freeze When the jelly-faced women all sneeze Hear the one with the mustache say, "Jeeze I can't find my knees" Oh, jewels and binoculars hang from the head of the mule But these visions of Johanna, they make it all seem so cruel The peddler now speaks to the countess who's pretending to care for him Sayin', "Name me someone that's not a parasite and I'll go out and say a prayer for him" But like Louise always says "Ya can't look at much, can ya man?" As she, herself, prepares for him And Madonna, she still has not showed We see this empty cage now corrode Where her cape of the stage once had flowed The fiddler, he now steps to the road He writes ev'rything's been returned which was owed On the back of the fish truck that loads While my conscience explodes The harmonicas play the skeleton keys and the rain And these visions of Johanna are now all that remain ----------------- Apparently this song has hints towards S6's vibe. I am a Dylan fan, quite easy to see some parralels Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LokedOut420 Posted November 5, 2009 Author Share Posted November 5, 2009 didn't a character named Johanna die early on? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
skybluedave Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 I'm a huge Bob fan, and I read the same thing. Whenever I listen to Senor off the Street Legal album I always think of Lost. Mainly due to the line: Well, the last thing I remember before I stripped and kneeled Was that trainload of fools bogged down in a magnetic field But tbh I've listened to VofJ about a million times and can't see any real Lost connection I think the lyrics are pretty wacky and out there. Really random. And is probably the worst song to try and analyse and work out. They are probably just messing with Lost fans tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Sandman Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 I think it could be that they are off the island and things are resetted but it keeps coming into their mind...visions of the island. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Springbok256 Posted November 5, 2009 Share Posted November 5, 2009 I really hate the idea of the reset, almost seems like the JR dream, or it all being Vincents dream or some ****. Though Sandmans idea would explain Daniels crying when he saw the news, but then His mind may still of held what Widmore told him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimmoMC Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 I think Daniel is crying because he knows in the future he'll go to the island and invevitably die. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 But tbh I've listened to VofJ about a million times and can't see any real Lost connection I think the lyrics are pretty wacky and out there. Really random. And is probably the worst song to try and analyse and work out. They are probably just messing with Lost fans tbh I think Lindelof was asked what song would sum up Lost and he named this as 'having some of the themes of the new series' or something along those lines Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razzler Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 I don't like the idea of a reset either, could be that the plane will land but they will be aware of what they have been through but that would lead to a 'we need to go back' version 2.0. I think the fact Jack seemed to think this will happen means it won't happen or it won't happen as people think it will, if it did it would remove Sun, Frank, etc from the 'other' time line with fake Locke in it, would also mean Locke isn't dead and so many other things so kind of negates that whole finale in the last series a bit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jongi Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 a reset would be just s**t Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMaster#28 Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 Weren't (the characters) trying to rest it all along by setting off the bomb in season 5? Or are we talking about something different Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jongi Posted November 6, 2009 Share Posted November 6, 2009 they were. we are just saying it would be crap if the bomb actually resulted in a reset happening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.