From what I believe this wont be the case.
I believe you play two teams from each "tier" of coefficient. Which I believe there is 5 tiers like quintiles of the coefficients, top 20%, next 20% etc etc
For example, Real Madrid will play 2 other teams from their level of coefficient, i.e, two from tier 2, two from tier 3, two from tier 4, two from tier 5 = Total 10 games.
For example in Real Madrid's group fixtures might be (based off current top 100 coefficients):
Tier 1: Man City + Bayern Munich
Tier 2: Arsenal + Napoli
Tier 3: PSV + AC Milan
Tier 4: Real Sociedad + Partizan
Tier 5: Standard Liege + CSKA Moscow
None of those games I would say is "easy" and some great clashes potentially.
The idea behind this is of course the big teams get at least 4 "big games" vs top European teams out of the 10 games, for that sweet revenue and then the rest of the games are vs "Easy" opposition so easier for them to qualify. Under the current group stage format, the top teams might get drawn with 3 big teams but it also means they might not progress through as each game it tough. This way they are guaranteed at least 2 home games vs a big European side. Easier to qualify for the next rounds etc etc.
The flip side "smaller" teams get to play 4 big teams and 5 home games vs 3 currently with potential for another playoff game, with at least 2 of those 5 games being vs a Tier 1 or 2 club, this means they get double the gate receipts, more revenue, TV Revenue as well and a chance of a playoff game as well to increase the money and potential to get into the latter stages of the competition, where I believe the money is about to seriously go up another level. They also get a chance vs teams at their own level to get points on the board.
For UEFA, more matches vs big teams and more matches in general = more games to sell to BT/Sky/Amazon/DAZN etc = more prize money and advertisement revenue potential
I for one, at first didnt like the idea, but now I am warming up to it.