Jump to content

Maviarab

Members+
  • Posts

    1,003
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Maviarab

  1. 13 hours ago, Dalseong said:


    As far as I can tell, the away support is usually around 10% when it's at full capacity/for big games (Bayern/Dortmund). Against smaller teams when the stadium is at full capacity, I've seen away support being at 2,000-4,000 or less.

    Yeah I would say this is very highly dependent on club/country.  Germany seems far better than many countries for allowing non season ticket holders in (ie, book online, get a ticket at the gate etc) than say compared to the Premier League where if you're not a holder, good luck ever trying to get a ticket to a match.  Also, domestic vs continetal games will be different too I imagine in terms of allocations.  As for the increase, again, maybe dependent on how well you're doing, marketing etc.  A real life example of this would be Boca, always been my dream to watch them at home, but given they have an 8 year (iirc) waiting list, with approx 25k fans on a 'reserve' list (which they pay for) in case a current season holder drops out...I think that dream will always stay as one (ezpecially as don't even live there either lol).  And those numbers are increasing I believe.  In Argentina! 

    I can imagine it's even worse for a big european club.

  2. You get this 'payment' at the end of the season.  100 million for 20th, 160 million for 1st place.  It's a tiered payment.  TV money, sponsorship etc etc, is usually paid throught the year.  You don't get a lump sum at the start of the season.

    As for the parachute payments, it is 3 years iirc, also tiered and not culmative, so if you get promoted the season after after relegation then relegated again, that initial 3 years sticks from when the payments first started, they do not start again from fresh.

  3. No idea where you read that about wages, has zero to do with it.  The WP is simply down to his reputation as a player and ultimately, international appearances (has to be something like 75% of last x amount of games.  The only qualifier to exempt that requirement is if they are touted as being the next big thing and/or their rep, value and experience (decided by an FA panel upon request) overshadow the lack of international appearances.  Ultimately this comes down to the home office (un the UK), nothing to do with the club.

  4. 2 hours ago, DarJ said:

    I don't really care about the transfer update, I've never cared and I'm not one of those that start a new save after the winter update, I just carry on whatever save I've been playing even if it was started during beta so I wouldn't want to wait since I'm just looking for the match engine patch and other quality of life improvements

    Exactly this Darj!

  5. It's not a licensing issue, they could make some effort if they chose to, to at east make them similar enough but avoid any legal issues.  They sinply don't, in fact, they are worse than they used to be.

    My only hope at this stage of FM's life is that with all the graphical and match engine changes required for adding the women's game, we'll actually get a brand new game completely, new ME and graphics.  I'll not hold my breath though.

  6. 7 hours ago, Lampard4King said:

    I'd be ok with this if the game didnt have a hard coded Endrick transfer as a 16 yr old to Madrid already in there. It is clearly possible, but to be more realistic with how clubs prefer to wait to see how a player develops before making transfer offers they prevent any transfers. In real life if a 16 yr old in brazil gets told he will be offered a transfer at European wage levels in 2 years, he wouldnt care about his development at his current club. The money would save his family and the guarantee would mean development. He'd sign the contract because it guarantees a higher salary than he would get at the same level at his current club.

    Spain has different work rules for youngsters compared to the UK.

    All perfectly realistic.  The issue here is people not understanding/knowing real life rules and perhaps more importantly, it's terribly implemented within FM.  If Fm gave more context, reasons as to why they refuse to talk to you, there would be far less confusion.

  7. 4 hours ago, DarJ said:

    I was just looking at it and I might take the Level 1 and 2. I’m not too interested in coaching so the UEFA B doesn’t seem like a good investment at the moment 

    Well worth it imo (I've done Lv 2)...if for nothing else it's actually informative and gives more insight.  I'd love to do Level 3 from a personal POV (not with a view to getting a job) but just don't have the time to commit unfortunately.  I recommend it, don't think you'd be disappointed.

  8. 4 hours ago, bielsadidnothingwrong said:

    Yes, clubs cover the cost of coaching badges because they’re really expensive irl and most require you to be actively coaching to enroll. 

    Level 1 – £150

    Level 2 – £320

    UEFA B – £720

    UEFA A – £3000

    As said before, unrealistic to 'start a save' with no experience.  Level 1 takes a few hours and is online.  Level 2 also requires no 'experience'.  UEFA B does require to be involved somehow, but can be done voluntarily with your local side in your free time.  Absolutely no excuse imo not to have the first 2 badges done if you are serious about it.  Even the B is not exactly out of the realms of most people.  Obviously, A onwards really requires to be actually employed in the industry and hopefully, have them pay for it.

    (The other issue,,,long-standing with FM is the badges/levels are also wrong lol...*shrugs*...we're suprised?)

  9. 53 minutes ago, gunnerfan said:

    That’s what I do. I’ve been tempted of late to walk out instead, in the hope that might change things up, but it would likely only sully my reputation with the press. 
     

    Pressers may not be the most ridiculous interactions in FM, but they are far and away the most tiresome.

    it doesn't affect your reputation...don't ask how know lol.

  10. Long standing issue.  Any real manager worth their salt and who is determnied to work in management would pay for the first 3 courses themselves, less than a grand and the first couse is free and online.  This is why I never, ever start with no experience because, it's just not realistic.

    The fact you still can't do this (or even get a national team to pay it for you in doing an international save) is just beyond stupiud at this point.  As for dialogues, refer you back to a recent thread regarding player/staff interactions. 

  11. 1 hour ago, numbas2 said:

    Not out the box too quality but they need to be generated and progress to that level. There should be a similar mix of player quality across all ages as there is in today's game. 

    Again, not saying there is not a problem as there is somewhat, but the vast majority of players never reach that level.  Good level yes, top class?  No.  So again, what exactly are you expecting?  Remember (again) there's 10x more champ level players (and probably 250x below) than there are 'top level'...

  12. I'd also add, while there is a known issue, exactly how many world class/elite/16/17yo's ready for the first team do you expect to see?  Hate to say it (and I agree there is an issue) but there really isn't that many in real life either.

    On another side note (and yes this has been discussed to death already), with modern fitness etc etcm, top elite players actually are playing longer than they used to say 30 years ago.  delicate balance for Si to resolve in terms of realism and gameplay.

  13. 1 hour ago, du Garbandier said:

    Meanwhile, IRL, just saw this:

    Ange Postecoglou 🗣️ - “Mate, I don't sit there listening to other manager's press conferences. There's 10 other managers in the league or whatever and if you think I spend my time sitting there wondering if each of them have something to say about...
    Ask me about Aberdeen tomorrow, ask me about the game tomorrow, ask me about our training.
    But asking me about what another manager has said in reference to another game altogether is just not on my radar so why I'd need to comment on it I've got no idea."
    What's probably clear is I should have taken another week off”
    Ange Postecoglou response when asked about Livingston manager David Martindale's and his thoughts on The Rangers squad depth and then Michael Beale's claims that they were on par with the Scottish champions

     

    Heh that's great.

  14. The first thing you need to do is largely ignore them.  The attribute system is there ultimately to give a quick glance of the 'quality' of a player imo.  How else do you differentiate Bob Smith of San Marino to Messi?  There has to be a scoring metric system somewhere.

    As for your argument of poor finishing but scoring a lot of goals, sure, dependent on the league.  Stick a guy with 3 finishing in the Premier League and I can pretty much guarantee even with great service, his return rate will be shocking but will still get goals due to statistical law of averages. Hwever, same said forward playing for your local pub team could be an absolute unit.  It's perspective. Let my cat take 100 penalties, she's going to score one of them at some point just by the above.  Attributes are mainly only useful for the level you're at, excluding outliers naturally.

    As for stars, people need tor ealise how the star rating actually works, which in fairness, should be explained far better by SI given their push to get new younger players onboard (along with a hundred other things but that's another conversation).  I agree it needs looking at, real managers don't have stats on a page for a player.  Hoqwever, it's a game, so should we really be watching training or if hands off, relying purely on our useless Ass Man?  This is similar to international management in FM, given how ridiculously bad the 3D engine is at showing us what the match engine is calculating, watching games to check a player is next to useless. so comes down again to form and....attributes.

×
×
  • Create New...